Categories
Podcast

6: Burnout Brands and the Burden of Potentia‪l‬

We speak with Pattern Brands co-founder Emmett Shine and psychotherapist Abby Krom about the undercurrent of burnout in American society and how it has opened the doors to a whole new breed of D2C branding. From analyses to antidotes, our obsession with burnout (and how to heal it) is changing the way we consider products and consider ourselves.

Podcast Transcript

Feb 13, 2020

50 min read

Burnout Brands and the Burden of Potentia‪l‬

00:00

Jasmine Bina:
This is Unseen Unknown. I’m Jasmine Bina. In today’s episode, we’re going to be talking about an interesting concept and that is the concept of burnout. It has become a story and idea that has captivated almost everybody that I speak with. In fact, one of the most widely read and widely circulated articles of 2019 was a Buzzfeed piece, which you may or may not have read, talking about how millennials have become the burnout generation. It has come to define who we are and how we see the world in many ways. It’s also created a whole new league of wellness and D2C brands that are responding to the burnout that people are feeling.

It’s an important trend, and it’s something that probably affects all of us as strategists and founders and I wanted to dig into it more. There was one really important person that I need to talk to in order to start this conversation and his name is Emmett Shine. Emmett’s name should ring a bell. He is the chief creative officer and co-founder of Pattern, which is a family of brands that includes Equal Parts and Open Spaces, amazing lifestyle brands but before Pattern, Emmett was the co-founder of Gin Lane. Gin Lane was one of a few creative agencies in the US that worked with the seminal brands that launched the D2C movement.

01:27

Brands like Hims, Hers, Harry’s, Sweetgreen, Recess, the list goes on and on, but he and his team were part of creating the storytelling and the aesthetic and the values and belief systems around the brands that really took over our lives. His work is important because it surfaced the trends that have come to define what burnout means for us today. He’s the person that is responsible for a lot of the stories that we’re hearing in the marketplace. My conversation with him started with his own story. It was important to understand where Emmett comes from to really understand how he was able to create what he’s created and where he thinks the future of the space is going.

02:09

Emmett Shine:
I think I’m always just exploring and looking for more white space where stuff is less defined. If you go back about half a decade or a little bit longer in New York city, this emerging class of entrepreneurs that were thinking digital first around consumer commerce to start, then consumer packaged goods and now it’s gone into healthcare and insurance and everything, it felt really new and really exciting. I think I was really happy to be a part of what felt like a novel chapter in, I don’t know, American business history, being someone I’m not really a business person.

I feel like creativity was really valued and design was really valued and user experience and design thinking became seen as something really valuable. So it was cool to be a part of that. I think for Gin Lane, we really dialed into that pretty deep over the next five to seven years and I don’t know, I think some of us just felt like either we were going to just burn out doing the same thing over and over to some extent, or if we wanted to stay within this world that we really loved and do more challenging work, which we tried a few times that also ran the risks of getting us out of our comfort zone, how we could balance our work and our personal lives.

03:41

So I just think Pattern felt like … It’s something that we thought on for years. It didn’t just happen overnight. We just always were thinking, what could be this next chapter, where we could take what we’re good at and stay together as a team, bring on some people that had been around us that we admired, but what could we do that was different, that would be the next kind of white space without having to completely reinvent ourselves and in our adult careers?

So I think just thinking, could we make our own brands and our own businesses, but do them in like a unified way around a topic that felt important to us, which was when we did go through those more stressful or trying times, it didn’t really seem like there was a brand or a business or a signal in the market that was talking on this information. This is a few years ago. This is before Anne Helen Petersen wrote her article on burnout. This is before Jia Tolentino’s book or How to Do Nothing, Jenny Odell. I feel like a lot of this stuff has been pretty cool. Zeitgeist, the last 18 months, which is awesome. I think for any of those people, they were probably thinking about it on their own 24 months ago, just like we were 24 months ago, thinking about this on our own and it all came out around 2019.

04:56

So I think a lot of people in America were feeling, millennials, especially the same way that we’ve been working really hard in high school and college. Then you get out and it’s the great recession or post great recession, and it’s hard to get a normal job and rent’s high and you have student loan debt and you’re trying to get a good job, but so is everyone else. It just feels a little bit like the rat race all over again, even if you are working in “the creative sector” or an information knowledge economy. I don’t know, it just didn’t feel like there was a lot of places you could go on, on your off where people were talking on this information in a first person relatable way.

So we thought, hey, here’s an interesting convergence, can we try to do something again, white space and open, which is like, try to build a new 21st century family of brands or a house of brands that are all related and working together versus just being an agency and pumping stuff out over and over. Let’s stay with these brands a little bit longer and can we marry it with the subject matter and topic that is personal to us and doesn’t really feel like there’s something in the market as much talking around it.

06:06

Jasmine Bina:
I want to go back to what you were saying before, about how you were starting to feel this, before it became part of the Zeitgeist. You started to feel, you say 24 months, but I also heard you said it was even longer before that, that you were starting to see that the tide was changing. What’s interesting is if you look back like four or five years ago, which is probably, I’m guessing when you guys were starting to really understand and feel this and the subtext, culturally, people weren’t talking about it. We were still kind of idolizing what I think was probably born in Silicon Valley. This idea of overwork, wearing your exhaustion like a badge of honor, the way we were kind of romanticizing the whole startup life.

It was bleeding into all other sectors. A lot of cultural stuff is seeping into the rest of the country through Silicon Valley. What I want to know is, because I know how we do it in our agency, but I want to hear how you do it in your agency. How do you pick up the signals that people can’t see yet? Because there wasn’t really a retaliation yet. I think the loudest thing I was hearing at the time was Arianna Huffington of the Huffington Post started her whole sleep movement, but even then I think people thought it was kind of hokey. I wasn’t taking it seriously in the beginning.

07:16

Emmett Shine:
Well, it also felt like executive performance-based or something.

Jasmine Bina:
Right. It was a business. It was hard to see the authentic conversation behind it, but how do you guys pick up on these signals before we even know they’re there?

07:29

Emmett Shine:
Yeah. I think I’m a voracious consumer of information. I think for myself, when I say working in the knowledge sector, the information sector, working in technology, whatever, my dad’s a landscaper. I grew up landscaping for him. A lot of my friends back home, they do the awesome jobs you do when you live in a small town. So I think that the blessing in this curse or whatever, when I’m like, “Yeah, I moved to the big city and I work with computers and do all that stuff,” is that it can really offer you so much. You can connect with people all over the world. You can maybe earn more money. You can create stuff that hasn’t been created before. The downside is that like, it moves really fast and you can get really caught up on something and then the market moves right by you because you got caught up on the wrong thing.

So for every great success story of someone doubling down on something ahead of everyone else, there’s a lot of people who have doubled down on the wrong thing. It’s like everyone trying to race to this GPS location and you ways go off the main road and think this back road is going to get you there, but then there’s a tree down and you got to go all the way back. So I think for the way that I’ve always tried doing this for, I don’t know, since the early, mid 2000s is to just try to read a lot of information and look for people who I trust their specificity within a certain area and listen to what they’re seeing and what they’re saying and then try to pull out, look at other people that have nothing to do with that individual and what are they seeing or thinking in a totally different part of culture or business.

09:12

Then I also try to just keep some good people around me that usually they don’t agree with most of the stuff I think or my hypotheses, but I like that because they’re very constructively critical in terms of thinking about culture. I’m always just trying to keep my gate open for ideas and information. Then it’s just always like, I love in, for Equal Parts, our first brand, the cooking brand. Again, I guess it’s synesthesia-esque is the scene in Ratatouille where Remy is showing his fellow rat when you combine strawberries and cheese, how explosive that taste is, how much stronger it is than if you just had a strawberry alone or a piece of cheese alone, and I feel like that’s ideas. It’s like a good idea is cool on its own, but a great idea is when you have two converging thoughts or inspirations from different places. That’s where I think it’s really fun.

10:10

Jasmine Bina:
I’m really excited that you said that. I feel that a lot of the biggest value that’s being created in brands today is things that are happening at the edges of spaces between spaces and it relates to your work. I think people have labeled Pattern as this response to burn out, so like burnout brands. But before that it was wellness and wellness is interesting because it’s like wellness, isn’t a space anymore. It’s this layer that’s being applied to every vertical. Wellness, obviously in beauty, wellness in self care. I see wellness now in all kinds of service sectors. I see wellness even in real estate, wellness in obviously medicine, stuff like that.

But what’s also interesting about you is when you were leading Gin Lane, you guys were working with a lot of brands that were starting … I think maybe even before we were using that word so much, they were playing in the wellness space. So Hims and Hers, two of my favorite case studies ever, Sweetgreen, Harry’s, Recess, certainly. I wanted to get your take on the wellness space because it blew up synonymously with D2C. Why has this idea captivated our generation, and more than that, a follow-on question, is how does it different for this generation and by this, I mean, millennials, versus baby boomers versus Gen Z?

11:35

Emmett Shine:
I think this is like the crux of it all. I guess let’s go specific and then I’ll zoom out. I think a lot of the recent trends in the market or brands or whatever, it’s been like micro wellness. I think what is cool to see emerging and I would categorize Pattern in that camp is like macro wellness. So it’s like, even some of the wellness stuff it’s like beauty or health care or self care or yoga or whatever. They’re just all these like sub sects. When you think of wellness, it’s coming out of the late 90s, early 2000s, like health and wellness stores. They have vitamins and smoothies and topical creams and then there’s the studios that come out of it for yoga and meditation, et cetera.

I think what we’re focused on is what is wellness at a homeostasis or a whole-ism level? Like how do you feel well? Not just like you don’t need medicine or something, because you feel bad. It’s like existentially when you’re bumping your head against the ceiling of what you’re capable of thinking on, how do you want to get out of bed and deal with money and family and stress and pain and feel like it’s worth it? It’s not like something you just have to do. It’s actually like you feel present, you feel enjoyment.

13:01

Pattern’s mission is enjoyed daily life. It’s like, how do we help people embrace the nuances and the grooves of daily life? Getting up in the morning, going to work or doing work, dealing with significant others or children or family, the responsibilities of being an adult and also existing in a society, that there’s so much information now that I think it’s really hard.

I don’t think our brains have evolved to deal with the amount of information we have and I think we have societally, structures that also don’t know how to deal with this much information. I think technology is just continuing to increase faster and faster. So then stepping back a little bit, why I think this is, I’ll take one step back and then we’ll take a few more back. I think you see it associatively with the direct to consumer cohort because direct to consumer, which really to me is just businesses that are digital first. That’s the language of consumer culture of our generation. That’s how our generation has basically grown up as let’s say, like purchasing adults as our native model for communication has been social platforms and then websites. It’s just a byproduct of our generation’s default way of doing business.

14:20

So if you look at our generation and you go back, you go maybe to the 70s where you can start seeing some of the laws and regulations and stuff, changing around businesses around capitalism. You have wages that have been more or less, when you account for inflation, stagnant since like 1974. I think the actual word, burnout first comes into like popular culture in 1974. There’s a lot of correlations between that and you look at how we’ve been basically, people who were born in the 80s into the 90s, when you have globalization really starting to take effect, when automation is stuff that you can hear Andrew Yang talking about now and it sounds crazy, but it’s been stuff that happened in America in the rust belt or the big industrial cities in the 70s. I think we’ve been generationally trained to work so hard and I think what I felt when I turned 30, which is just over five years ago, was, what’s the point?

Why are we running so fast and working so hard when it feels like the winners, if this is like a game of life, they’re not winning? They’re stressed out and they’re not happy. So I just feel like the matrix, the game is off a little bit. So if I’m getting super heady, I don’t selling cookware and home organizational goods is the silver bullet. I’m not delusional. It’s just, we know how to market stuff and brands and I just wanted to keep doing what we’re good at about stuff that I felt myself and our team needed. We wanted to spend more time in our homes. We wanted to spend less time with clutter, more time doing mundane activities that we could just lose ourselves and not be stressed about work or the world around us and find little flow state moments.

16:07

I think if you go back to the last few years of Gin Lane and we were searching for those types of brands. So it’s working with therapists businesses like Alma or working with brands like Recess at our antidote for modern times, or dealing with Hims and Hers or working with Make-A-Wish, just trying to explore and figure out a little bit like where does the market need to go for our generation who are seeking and searching for more than I think people were maybe looking for in the 90s or early 2000s? I think it was just a different time.

16:37

Jasmine Bina:
So there’s so much to unpack here. What you’re describing is brands that carry a lot more emotion, or I guess you would say emotional triggers. I think where Pattern’s brands play and the companies that you’ve created for your clients, a lot of this is about using emotional triggers in a premium space to get people to not just buy the product, but also the story and the ethos behind it and wellness, self care, all these concepts, they command a premium. It’s not just about getting the product. Either you pay a premium in price or you pay a premium in education or the time it takes to use the product. What you guys are talking about with Equal Parts and Open Spaces, like slowing down, taking your time, which can be luxuries for some people.

I don’t want to paraphrase too much what you’re saying. What I want to get at is my next question, which is how are people purchasing differently? You’re talking about a lot of emotional purchase decisions. How do you see people behaving and buying differently in these spaces that you’re operating in?

17:44

Emmett Shine:
I think there’s a few trends or answers. I think post 2008, the cohort of what is dictating consumer culture in America is continuing shift to be more millennials, and it’s also fast approaching that Gen Z are an emerging bloc of Americans. I think the sensibilities are for both of them, but I’ll talk on what I think is a difference. I think millennials, that we feel burned by the government, by businesses and I think people want more insights into the businesses and leadership. They want transparency, they want responsibility. They want to hear about what it’s made of. Is there the charitable component or the responsibility of the materials or just a brand that looks like them.

I think there are more businesses that are more diverse in terms of how they’re marketed, who their leadership is, the values they have than ever before. I think there should be, I think businesses should be more a reflection of society and America is a very diverse society. So I think millennials are more of wanting to trust businesses and have an affinity for businesses and they will support those businesses by voting with their wallet.

19:03

Jasmine Bina:
When you say people are looking for brands and businesses and leaders that look like them, is this in contrast to more aspirational brands that are creating an image of what we should look like? Could we oppose these two or is this like a counter trend?

19:18

Emmett Shine:
I think a few things. Let’s go back to like the 90s and early 2000s. This is before “influencer culture.” So basically, how do you market a brand? You get celebrities or you do zany marketing or you talk about crazy … Like Nike is interesting. They would have crazy product details. It’s like the new Air Max 3000 with this cushion that does this thing. Then they would also have a famous athlete and then they also would do a crazy marketing stunt. Those things don’t not work, but that was the default of the day. Then when you move forward into social media, which more democratize, people having voices and a pedestal to speak from, you get into a little bit of what I think you’re talking on, which is this aspirational culture, which is it’s actually like aspirationally attainable.

So like a celebrity is pure aspiration, an influencer is like, “Hey, look, I’m just like you,” but it’s still kind of aspirational. That’s a new trend that’s only like 10 years old. It’s just, if you’re growing up in it, 10 years is a long time to be inundated when everyone else starts to follow that format. I think what’s emerging now amongst other things that bifurcate continuously as this stuff works is people wanting even more authenticity and they think they can just sniff test and know when something is formulaic. When it’s that a business is just hiring a bunch of influencers, paying them money, the influencers don’t really care about the product. They just know that they can get money for it and convince people to buy it. I think people are smarter than they think.

20:56

I think politicians, sometimes you think people are stupid. I think businesses sometimes think people are stupid and I think brands that are doing well and emerging of the past few years, they are authentic and they have a mission. Their promise sounds like they really mean it and people feel and can sense that. Whether you like Donald Trump or not, I think he capitalized on being someone who is very different than the politicians. I think on the left, you have Bernie Sanders doing something similar. I think for businesses, whether it’s Warby Parker or The Wing or Glossier or Everlane or Fenty or Savage from Rihanna, these are just modern, different businesses that feel like they were made by people that share the similar values from a similar time, than a Procter & Gamble or a Unilever or big faceless businesses from the 20th century.

Jasmine Bina:
Right. Then going back to how people purchase differently. So obviously what you’re describing is people have … They’re more sophisticated it seems. They have a gut reaction to what it is they feel aligns with their values and what they purchase. Is there anything else you’re seeing in the way people are behaving and purchasing in this new context around how we operate in the world, the way that you’ve described it?

22:13

Emmett Shine:
I was going to say on like Gen Z and younger people, I feel like that’s even more flat and I feel like that is actually even more weirdly relatable, where if you look at the emerging platforms of like TikTok, it just feels like there are bands working on TikTok and stuff and it’s just, I guess, the next class of how people use voices and channels and platforms to communicate within market. I think there’s also something that feels more decentralized and more, I don’t know, even another click into, like authentic of some of the services and brands that are doing a good job of communicating on that. I would say also in E-comm, if there’s people listening of that, it’s now that stuff has coalesced around the Shopify ecosystem, the cottage industry.

I think what’s cool is looking at where people are selling stuff through Instagram or they’re selling stuff through different applications and they’re more decentralizing or they’re using some of the no-code stacks that are popping up. So I think the playbook of having this fancy website that’s integrated with Shopify and running paid campaigns with influencers on social channels and doing some out of home, it still makes sense and stuff, but we’re going through the new start of another cycle, which I think is going to be a bit leaner, a bit faster and a bit more decentralized. I don’t know if you’ll even really need a website to run a business off of in a few years. I think the younger generation in America, or maybe millennials, we’re still laptop-based in a lot of ways.

23:52

We browse stuff on our phones, but then you go home and you go on to Amazon or your social channels or your favorite sites, and you mark it or whatever and you pull it up on your laptop and you open “different tabs” and comparatively shop. I think that the younger generation is just way more mobile native, and I think you’re going to start seeing … Look at SMS as an emerging channel. It’s like, think about the open rates of texting versus an email, or think about the continuing rich media or integrations with like SMS, MMS.

You think about, again in Asia, you have these platforms that are for chatting and communication, but also commerce. So you don’t need traditional, standalone websites, just like of our generations, you would’ve obviously located traditional standalone retail stores. So I think things are just becoming more decentralized, more lean, more about communication in asynchronous way versus old-school was broadcast and then it was like direct digital broadcast. I feel like it’s more mobile now and just conversational, which I think is cool.

24:59

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. So I’m like, while you’re describing this, thinking of, am I seeing this in any of Pattern’s brands? You have a lot of great insights and I love that you have an opinion on where things are going. I know people listening are going to want to hear a bit more either about Equal Parts or Open Spaces, because I know you guys are super thoughtful in the way you create brands. There’s so much that goes probably unsaid that is behind the way you guys design the brands that you create. I would love it if you could take either of the brands right now and maybe describe some of the deeper thinking and decisions behind them that maybe as consumers, we just don’t see. Decode the brand for us a little bit.

25:44

Emmett Shine:
Yeah, for sure. I’ll give a shout out to @ginlane who headed up our brand department and has helped architect for Pattern, our brands, Camille Baldwin. So she loves pyramids and triangles and bases that ladder up to stuff. I think for Pattern, our mission is enjoy daily life and then for Equal Parts, it’s enjoy home cooking and for Open Spaces it’s create space to enjoy. So the common theme is enjoyment for our family brand, as well as the sub-brands. Then they’re all centered around essentially domestic activities within the home. So we were really thoughtful in terms of how we set up Pattern. At first, when we were stressed out by work, we didn’t just try to go tackle, I don’t know, your anti-productivity apps or services within the workplace.

We thought of like, why don’t we just rethink home and rethink it as a little bit of a sanctuary where you can put your phone down. Equal Parts was our first beachhead brand, because, well, for a few reasons. I think home cooking was a remedy that a lot of our team were using to deal with the stress of work when it got intense. They would come home and get lost and not think about email or Slack or some Asana board or whatever it is while they’re focusing on the heat and simmering and putting stuff in the pot. Putting some music on, pouring a glass of wine or some whatever, nice ginger ale.

27:21

We also saw it as a nice beachhead into the home and tying back to the earlier conversation, we have this notion where we have like a hotline. We have like, you can text professional coaches who we have on staff and we saw that and cooking as a great beachhead into the home to better understand our audience. We did consumer interviews and research, but we ran a half year beta of just trying to understand the behaviors of potential customers in America, in their late 20s, early to mid 30s, whatever, when were they cooking? We found out that people were doing a lot of meal preparation and meal planning on weekends, and that they would then cook based on that stuff Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, but no one was really cooking on Thursdays and Fridays and sometimes Saturdays.

So we understood the rhythm and flow of our audience through SMS, and that also helped inform then how Open Spaces came in, which is more of like a multi-zone brand. So Equal Parts is focused on helping people rethink their relationship in the kitchen and the dining room and Open Spaces is really for every room in your apartment.

28:28

We wanted to have a little bit more information on the behaviors of our customer, which the texting service allowed us to just talk to hundreds, if not thousands of customers, before we rolled out Open Spaces to get a better picture of what their days were looking like and where there were pain points. So we’re always testing, we’re building websites with fake brands and running ads. We’re always doing focus groups and consumer interviews, and it’s not like that dictates what to do. We’re just trying to get as much information as possible and then just try to push where we think the space of the industry is in an adjacent way.

We’re never trying to be revolutionary. We’re always just trying to evolve things to feel a little bit new and different, but they’re not so far away that they’re hard to grasp or see, or make that cognitive leap. We’re very fortunate enough that we can try to do something we’re passionate about, and I just hope for entrepreneurs today or coming up that are younger or people within the organizations that those entrepreneurs will build, that people feel more confident to be vulnerable and more confident to talk around topics for business that maybe are harder to do or say.

29:42

I’m just trying to break, I think a lot of what became the normal culture out of Silicon Valley, as you said. We did an interview for Open Spaces, our brand that just launched and it’s awesome. I’m excited and Equal Parts is doing great, but in the interview I said, “We went to creative with Equal Parts.” I don’t think we were as disciplined as we were when we were doing Gin Lane projects because we wanted to be undisciplined and I think Pattern has wacky watercolors and it’s all painted and the website loads in and you can’t click anything for 10 seconds. It just breaks every best practice and it worked really well.

I think we tried that for Equal Parts and some of it didn’t work. It was hard to see the products. I think some of the brand storytelling was just all in the way of the actual product details. The websites were full of crazy progressive graphic animations and we had to really listen to market and pull back and fix a lot of stuff. I think being honest about that is important, whereas we’re still in market, we’re still learning, but I’m not going to lie and just say like we had everything figured out and hopefully that makes it easier for other people to talk about the challenges of trying to run a business or working in a business. I’m not saying that our business is also run perfect.

30:59

I think sometimes people do work late and do get burnt out and we’re trying to be better about, unmarried, secondary caregiver time off. So we’re trying to push that. So I don’t know. I think it’s just talking about stuff as you’re working through things is healthy. It’s like what therapy is all about. I just feel like in business culture, you just have to be all 20th century alpha, I have it all figured out and pardon my French, it’s just bullshit ad it’s not healthy

31:23

Jasmine Bina:
Listening to Emmett makes you realize that there are two stories happening around burnout. There’s the surface level story around the burnout that we feel as consumers and as individuals and how that affects our purchasing behaviors, how we move throughout the world, how we relate to brands and the kinds of solutions that brands are trying to create for us, either through their products or through their storytelling. But there is a different narrative around burnout that is a bit more internal. The burnout that we feel in our interpersonal relationships, the burnout that we feel and the lack of satisfaction that we have, the burnout that’s harder to articulate and harder to name and something that I thought was worth exploring.

I spoke with Abby Crumb, who’s a licensed therapist who has explored the subject of burnout extensively, not just with millennials, but Gen Z people in her practice as well. She’s explored the idea of the burden of potential, which is one of the precursors or causes of burnout. It’s an interesting concept that maybe can start to explain where the lion’s share of our burnout is coming from and how we can deal with it.

32:30

Abby Krom:
So the burnout potential is essentially the pressure we feel around potential. So you can think of it as if you think of the phrase, a waste of potential. Like we have a fear of that. So the burden of potential is that pressure to manifest or reach the height of your potential and we just get so many messages in this culture that you need to be almost like started at age zero with that, that it becomes this shackle on you from a really early age. So it starts to feel like a burden.

Jasmine Bina:
So how did you come across this in your own work? What was the genesis of this thing? Because I think we all feel it, I just don’t know that we’ve ever named it.

33:19

Abby Krom:
Yeah, and it’s funny. So I spontaneously said it, but then I looked it up and I wasn’t the first one to say it, but I was actually working with a high school student who was the hope for her community because she was really smart and she had talent. So everyone in her community would kind of say, “You’ve so much potentially,” and she was just like, “I don’t want to hear that one more time.” I said, “Oh, it feels like it’s a burden,” and she was like, “Exactly,” because she knew not did she have the potential, but it was being witnessed by other people. Once it’s witnessed, then it’s like, oh, I really have to act on this or people will really know that I haven’t gotten to the height of my potential.

Out of evolutionary biological psychology, there’s this thing about status that we’re actually wired not to lose status. What will happen is, so they give this example, like, let’s say there’s a guy in Indiana and he’s the smartest guy in his town. Then everyone’s excited for him to take the SATs and see what college he gets into. So the night before the SATs, he’ll get drunk and fail it because then he can say, “Well, it’s because I got drunk.” He never has to actually show that, what if I can’t actually get into Harvard or something like that.

34:30

So we do that because if you lost status or some kind of talent in the tribe, you would get kicked out. So that’s just wired into us that if you ever hit a height, like let’s say you’re an Olympian. I imagine the day after the Olympics, if you can’t qualify again is really scary because it’s like, how will I ever hit that height again? So even hitting our potential can almost be depressing in a way, because it’s like, where do I go from here? That was my whole sense of worth.

34:56

Jasmine Bina:
This is fascinating because I feel like you touched on a lot of things. One, I feel like I hear a little bit of imposter syndrome in this. People feel like once they’ve reached a certain height, they have to keep proving that they are that person. So they feel a bit of imposter syndrome, which reminds me of Carol Dweck’s work, where she talks about the fixed mindset versus the growth mindset. I have a personal story here even. So my sister is a high school teacher and when we were kids, I was in the gifted and talented education program. You’re familiar with that? Right, okay.

So I was in GATE and I even had to be bused to a different school from my school and there were only 10 of us and it was like this little tribe, but my sister was telling me years later, while I was in college, that now that they’ve had time to do long-term studies on these kids, they see that these kids really feel a sense of imposter syndrome. They have a fixed mindset because GATE taught them that this is how good you are at an early age and it didn’t give them room to fail. I still am deprogramming myself from having such a tremendous fear of failure. The burden of potential you’re talking about truly, there’s no other word. It is a burden because it takes up so much mind space. You feel the heavy weight of having to prove that you are capable of what people see in you. That’s super heavy.

36:19

We have systems in our culture like GATE that actually, and now that things are so public, now that you can peak in high school when everybody sees it, now that you can be an entrepreneur that has a super early win and does tremendously, and then fails the next time, have you seen this a lot in your millennial patients? Have you seen this burden pop up over and over again?

36:46

Abby Krom:
All the time. It’s constant because it is almost embedded in our culture that you are supposed to be, and it’s from parents. So parents feel this pressure to also manifest their kid’s potential. So there’s kind of this message. I remember when I was a kid, if I made a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, my mom was like, “You should do a cookbook.” There was just like the encouragement, which was meant to be encouraging and helping me find my path. I do think paths are more meandering than we like to pretend they are. So if you’re good at football at an early age, that path is just set from like, it’s just like, oh, you know what that’s to look like. The high school and the clubs sports and the all that, and there’s not like, “This year I don’t want to do football.”

Parents are scared to do that. “Well, why don’t you just stay in football and then we’ll see how it goes when you’re 40.” They just can’t because they’re scared. So there’s all this stuff, “Oh, millennials are so…” All this stuff people say about millennials. That they’re entitled and lazy and all this stuff. It’s not really bad. It’s that everyone’s forced to find in what way they’re special and then we get to points like we can’t all be special all the time. So you get into a workforce where, when you’re doing unspecial work, which is what we’re required to do sometimes, you actually feel shame.

38:08

So I think there’s a way in which it does get avoided, but not because people are just lazy. I just don’t even believe in laziness. I believe we are a product of the culture in a reward and consequence system. So there’s very little reward for being the person to do unspecial work.

Jasmine Bina:
So unspecial work is, this is important for us to talk about here because it relates to burnout a little bit, which is the larger topic of this discussion. It seems that there’s different definitions of burnout, but the definition that I’ve seen, which I think was on the Vlogbrothers. Hank was talking about this, is that when you are doing something and the treadmill keeps running, but the dopamine hit stops coming, meaning you’ve stopped doing something that’s passionate for you. That’s one way I’m interpreting it. This pressure to constantly do what makes you feel passionate about it, I feel like it’s caused us to muddy the waters. Maybe we don’t even know what we’re passionate about because so much of that is signaling to the world like, I am doing this special work, like you said, but maybe the thing I’m passionate about is super mundane. Do you see that? What are your thoughts on that?

39:23

Abby Krom:
So what I think it’s that, yeah. What I think is important is everything’s going to include menial days, mundane days, but you have to be okay with that at least a little bit. If you don’t like the practices in football, I don’t know why I keep using some metaphor, but if you don’t like practicing and all that other stuff in between, you only like making touchdowns, that is going to be a miserable life for you. The people who really, I think do well and mentally well in these sports are people who like practice, even when it sucks where they can still have a bad day. They can still not love it all the time, but they have an affinity for it.

They don’t mind the middle parts. So a lot of people get so pressured into picking something they think they’re good at, or maybe you’re talented at, but you hate every aspect of it except when you excel. Then I think you get stuck in this cycle where you’re just going to be unhappy most of the time, unless you’re “winning” or succeeding at whatever it is.

40:23

Jasmine Bina:
Do you feel like a lot of our burnout as a culture now is coming from this disconnect that you’re describing and the burden of potential?

Abby Krom:
I think where it’s coming from is more the treadmill. Treadmill is a metaphor that just comes forward for me all the time, which is I’m not allowed to get off the treadmill and if I do, something bad is going to happen. I was just listening to somebody and they talked about this thing. Let’s say your work says, “Hey, you can take mental health days whenever you want.” Well, there’s still going to be this thing where you feel like, oh, I don’t want to be the person that looks like they need that because I don’t see anyone else doing it, versus if you were required to have mental health days. Then people would actually take them or they would be forced into taking them and get the benefits of them.

41:05

Jasmine Bina:
Do you feel for some reason, as a culture we’re idolizing overwork?

Abby Krom:
Absolutely. It really has become, not to get too much into the religious and spiritual, but it has become the replacement, I think for that. I’m not someone who’s attached to a particular religion or that you need spirituality, but I do think we need something beyond our lives and right now that is work for so many people, but the belief system is like, you give everything to this, you know what I mean? And that that is how you’re going to prove your worth. Especially when you hear the criticism about millennials, how could we not? Everything’s about them being lazy and entitled. Part of me wonders, so when someone sets a boundary with you, does that make them lazy?

Because there have been times when I’ve had to set boundaries and the people of older generations hate it. Because it’s like, “How come you get to do that? I didn’t set boundaries. I was, you say yes to everything and I don’t believe in that,” but that is part of work culture. Like just be a yes man and I just don’t buy into that.

42:11

Jasmine Bina:
I do want to get into the religion as well.

Abby Krom:
Sure.

Jasmine Bina:
So let’s assume, which I think for some people, this will feel very personal, but even though it sounds so cliche and we don’t want to believe it, we have many new religions. Work is one of them and I’ve talked about this. It’s because our other institutions are failing, religion itself for a lot of people is failing. A lot of people are moving out of religion and more into a spiritual realm where they’re deciding what their connection to the universe or themselves is. The thing about religion though is that it has clear rules, clear boundaries, and it delivers.

That’s why it’s so hard for atheist groups to create a substitute for religion, which they’ve tried and we’ve done work with atheist organizations and when people leave religion, there’s just this gaping hole where yeah, we’re all looking for meaning and it’s hard to have that without religion. So when we look to work to give that to us, is there ever a context that you see where work could actually give us enough meaning to bring us happiness the way like a religious system might have?

43:19

Abby Krom:
Absolutely. I do think that, and that’s like when we talk about getting into flow states, when we talk about when your work and your joy merge, and it doesn’t mean you’re happy every day. Happiness is not like an end point, but even in the work I do, I feel like I’m really close to that and especially because I’m in private practice and I can work for myself, I do feel like I’m closer to that. Work is a very fulfilling purpose for me. So I do think it can be that. I think corporate culture and capitalism make it really difficult. I don’t want to get rid of work. I think there is something to work that’s really meaningful to people’s lives. It’s more the systems that are the organizers of work right now.

Jasmine Bina:
So did you have an experience with the burden of potential?

44:13

Abby Krom:
Yeah. So for me well, so it’s interesting that I mentioned the story about my mom. I think from a young age, I did already have kind of, no one ever sat me down and said you should make something of yourself. I didn’t have one of those high pressure. I was almost like the opposite. Like if I got a C, my parents were like, “Okay,” but there was something of, do something important. I don’t know where that quite came from, but many people in my family did go on to do big, important things. So I think there’s growing up in the shadow of giants. So if you’re somebody who your family member did something important, I think that adds to the burden.

So then I moved out to LA and I was doing standup and improv, and I remember specifically telling my own therapist that I was like, “I’m never really happy because if I have a great show and everyone loves me, I feel like anxiety. How am I going to produce that again, and if I have a terrible show, obviously I don’t feel great about that and if it’s neutral, then again, that’s ordinary. That’s average. That’s not good enough.”

45:23

Jasmine Bina:
I don’t want to gloss over this. You said it like it was nothing. You moved to LA to do standup and improv. That’s huge. I don’t meet too many people that do that. People move to LA to be actors, but standup and improv, which sound like my personal nightmares. You wanted to make a life out of this before you were even thinking of therapy, like that’s who you were.

Abby Krom:
Well, and I am more of a risk … Whenever I say that and I’m always, I’m very fearful of risk and people look at me and go, “You did stand up.” So I totally get that and I don’t know exactly what came together to allow me to overcome my fears to do it. It’s a thread in my family too. A lot of like funny, and we’re Jewish. It’s very much like humor is how you get status. I was at a training and I have a mentor and I was just talking about myself and she said something like, “So in your family, applause was love,” and it just hit me like a ton of bricks. I was like, “Oh yeah,” that was it. That’s how you got status in my family, was being the funniest one at the table.

46:34

So I think a lot of my journey into standup and my mom did put me into my second grade talent show doing standup, wrote me an act, which I don’t know what it was about. Like the school chicken nuggets. I can’t imagine what that act was, but I remember when they called my name to audition and I had what my mom had prepared for me, they were like, “Abby?” And I just sat there. I didn’t raise my hand. I just pretended there was no Abby there. So I think it just started there where I needed to prove something, and the things I love about stand up is you do get to talk about larger cultural issues. I do like to challenge things.

I do have opinions. I like ultimately what standup is, and it provided a lot for me watching standup comedians when I felt on the outside, like in high school and things like that. The world of standup though, is a little different, and I definitely felt that burden. So I just realized I was never going to be happy in that world.

47:34

Jasmine Bina:
So how did you come to therapy, then?

Abby Krom:
So I was in therapy and then I realized, and then also a good friend of mine was in graduate school and I realized that’s what I really … I was at the time also volunteering at a hotline. So I was already doing counseling. So when she told me about her graduate school program, I just said, “That’s exactly what I want to do.” I remember saying to my therapist though, “I don’t see how these are going to merge. I have to kind of kill one to do the other.”

She was like, “You’ll be surprised. I’m sure they’ll come together at some point.” I kind of like, okay but the truth is, now I do workshops. I’m speaking and this feels so much better, just what I’m doing today with you to be able to talk about meaningful things and my humor is in there, but not have to be the funniest person in the world and make it onto a certain stage or something like that. I’m just allowing, if I have the opportunity to speak, I take it and that’s how I use it now.

48:35

Jasmine Bina:
What you just described, it sounds like that was your way of dealing with the burden of potential. Like you found something else that still gave you the same outlets that you wanted, but it seemed like it was your openness that allowed you to get out from under that burden. What’s the antidote to this burden that we all feel?

Abby Krom:
I think it’s like baby steps. Whenever I’m guiding a client through this process, you don’t have to do anything impulsively. If you’re like, I really feel burned out at my job and it really isn’t what I want to be doing, it’s just starting to figure out … And the thing is, it’s really hard to ask, like if I was to give your listeners some generic questions to ask themselves, it sounds so generic. That’s why I love being with somebody one-on-one because I can really dig into people’s stuff, but to really think about again, when we talk about flow state, what could you do all day every day and enjoy it? What gets you into that place where you can let go of the rest of the world. These are at least going to start to create baby steps into something.

49:40

For me, that was graduate school. I was like, “Let me try this,” and the more I did it, the more possibility showed up because if anyone had told me, all you hear when you’re in graduate school for psychology is there’s too many therapists. It’s saturated. You will never make private practice. You’re going to have to work in an agency. It’s going to be miserable. So that’s why so many people, again, have trouble getting off the treadmill because all you’re going to hear is messages like, “Not a good idea. You have a good job.”

So it’s really overcoming the fear and actually stepping into the unknown, seeing if you actually die off the edge, which rarely happens. So that’s why so many people need support to do it because I think it’s really hard to do on your own because you will get a lot of messages that it’s not possible to do anything else, but what you’re doing.

50:26

Jasmine Bina:
That’s really good. I’m going to jump in here and say like, from a cultural perspective, a lot of our listeners are our founders and brand strategists. These things matter to us because they give us a touchstone into what people are thinking, but more importantly, how they’ll probably behave. So how does a fear of reaching our potential affect the way that we behave, the way that we plan our lives, even the ways that we buy and consume, the ways that we relate to each other? How does this manifest into our every day?

50:57

Abby Krom:
I think it just makes us really fearful. I do think there’s this other way, besides fear. So this is Kristin Neff’s research, but she researched why we self criticize and the number one reason we do is motivation. We think self-criticism is the only way to motivate ourselves, but there’s really a lot of other ways to motivate without such a cost. So if you criticize somebody or yourself, it will motivate you, but there’s so many costs at the end of the day. We can actually encourage people into doing good work. We can actually inspire people into doing good work, and I would love to see that.

I see it a little bit, like I just saw this commercial for LeBron James doing a calm for the Calm app. That’s great. Athletes should be paying attention to their mental health. I think Michael Phelps did BetterHelp. So just to start saying, we don’t have to criticize ourselves into success, that there are other ways, because we don’t act like that in this culture. We say, “No pain, no gain.” You have to berate yourself and I just don’t think that’s true.

52:07

Jasmine Bina:
So self-criticism is like a script, and scripts kind of become our identities. The burden of potential, or even just this potential that you have, I know for me, it’s been my identity since I can remember and I know how destructive that is. Do you find that people are often, their identities are really, really deeply intertwined with whatever their potential is, or is there a gap? Is there some breathing room that we can create space in where we can start to change that story?

52:36

Abby Krom:
Yeah, there’s definitely a gap, but I do think for most people, it’s my potential is my identity. So whatever I’m going to become, this future self, that becomes what everything’s about. So the way I’ve reframed it is not that I have to become this particular thing and get attached to a really, again, fixed idea of what the best future for myself is because we’re terrible predictors of what will make us happy. So I think when you think of potential as an unfolding, and if I do … So this actually comes from recovery community like AA, but they always say next right step. So that’s where I’m always going with people. So they go, “Oh, well I do want to go and get my MBA, and I want to change careers and I want to do this,” but like 50 years and they get way too overwhelmed by the enormity of it all.

I go, “What’s the next right step for you, if you want to move in that direction?” I trust there’s an unfolding that may look different than your idea of it and for me personally, I’m like, “I have an idea of where I want to go,” but right, for instance, just how this came about, this whole talk. This was just because we got introduced in a way that I couldn’t have predicted. So when we think of potential as something we don’t have to control, but that unfolds naturally when we take the next right step, that to me is so much more freeing than I have to create this reality in which I’m a superstar.

53:57

Jasmine Bina:
When you say that, it makes perfect sense and it takes a lot of that pressure off. And I feel like people are waiting for that permission. There’s something else you talked about reminded me of a study that I read about how we love to shop because it’s actually a very imaginative act, especially when we’re shopping for clothes, because you’re imagining your future self. A lot of us even buy clothes that we don’t have an immediate use case for them right now. Like we’re not going on vacation, so we’re not going to wear this bikini or we don’t fit into these jeans right now, but you imagine how you’re going to feel in that future state and you imagine what people will think of you and how you will be perceived in that future state as well. It’s also sounds like, this example and what you’re talking about too is a burden is that like, it also prevents us from being present in the moment. It’s always pushing our mindsets to the future.

54:52

Abby Krom:
Exactly. That’s what it is. It’s all future-focused and you’ll be happy in the future and you have to suffer this now. So it will be better in the future, and how many people have gotten to that thing? Maybe you did get the NFL contract and you’re depressed. So then you don’t get the promise either. You know what I mean? I think it’s terrible what we do to kids in high school. What I hear from my adolescent clients is like, the school counselor come in, “You need to know what you’re doing. You guys are sophomores. Get on it.” The truth is, you don’t, you just don’t know.

So why are we forcing people? Someone’s going to give you an answer because they feel pressure to, but it’s not really how things work. So we’re always focused on this future that’s going to be better versus what’s working for you right now. That’s where I think the best data is.

55:43

Jasmine Bina:
I think, not to persist too far, but that’s what we’re seeing with the brands that we talk about on this podcast. A lot of brands that are trying to bring us back to the present, because it’s almost like this recoiling against whatever you might want to call it, aspirational or this future sense of who you can become. There’s this new narrative that brands are employing that forces us to come back to today and just be very engrossed and present in what you’re doing now. We were just speaking with Emmett Shine in this conversation. He was talking about how they decide to start in cookware because when you cook, it’s really hard to do anything else or think about anything else. When he said that I felt it because I can do anything.

I can even, I hate to admit this. I can even be feeding my kids and be thinking about work or thinking about things I need to do, or resisting the temptation to look at my phone, but not when I’m doing things like cooking. I think that’s why I love it because it’s so much of an escape and that just occurred to me. I think I’ve always said I just like cooking because I’m good at it, but that’s probably not the truth. So in your research, there was a line that stood out to me and you said, “It can be hard to believe there might be more than one way to reach our potential and live a satisfying life.” Why is that? Why is it so hard for us to see alternatives?

57:03

Abby Krom:
Because again, we get this message, again, from very early that you need to get on your path and hang out on it for 30 years. So it’s like, if you miss this boat, that’s what they’re saying to the high school kids. If you miss this boat and don’t get in the right college, well, that’s a real problem and it’s not true. How many people didn’t get into the college they want or didn’t even go to college and they’re fine? So it’s, again, a fear-based thought. It’s not accurate. So I think this idea that there is mystery in the world and nobody gets an insurance policy.

We are all going to have joy and excitement and thrills, and we’re going to have failures and sickness and decay. That is part of the whole human experience. Nobody gets to avoid that. So instead of setting it up that there’s this one way to happiness, get on that treadmill or homelessness. Bye, and everyone’s successful is just waving bye in your loser canoe. So it just doesn’t happen. It’s not true. So if you look at anyone’s story that is successful, there will be many detours. Nobody has a straight line.

58:23

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. That’s probably one of the greatest lies we tell ourselves generationally. I can’t speak to other generations. As a very, very late stage millennials, I feel like … It’s easy to understand and internalize, we have this burden of potential. We’re all feeling burnout because there’s a huge disconnect between who we think we should be and who we are, which by the way, is the same definition of shame. Who we think we should be or what the world expects of us, versus who we actually are, which is interesting. There’s a lot of shame tied up in this, but it’s hard to accept that if you know you are capable of great things, that that can be more than one thing and you can be happy by just choosing one of those at the expense of another.

59:08

Abby Krom:
That’s the thing is like, and that’s why I do believe all paths come together. I love this quote. “We often reach our destination on the road we took to avoid it.” So I think that even if you get on a path that you think you’re avoiding, or if you get on a path that you’re like, “Well, I’m going to community college. My life is over,” we will reach where we need to get to, if we can stay on the path, which is very painful when we don’t know.

So the detour some people take sometimes is into addiction or substances or just things that really do take you so far off the path. It’s hard to get to your destination, but again, those things, I know so many people who are in recovery, that that was the best thing that could have happened to them. They’ve learned skills for life that get them to where they are now, but what I see of people who really do realize their potential, they have a lot of support.

01:00:00

Jasmine Bina:
It reminds me of, I don’t know if you’ve seen that Netflix documentary called Losers.

Abby Krom:
Exactly. That’s in my article because I-

Jasmine Bina:
Oh, was it? That’s probably how I’m remembering it. We’ll link to that in the show notes too, because that is an incredible series about people who were at the height of their careers and then they lost somehow. It’s just unapologetically, honest stories of people who really, they talk about the disappointment and they talk about the loss, but then you start to see that that’s not the end of the story for a lot of these people. The other thing that I’m hearing when you’re talking about the burden of potential is that there’s this undercurrent of uncertainty and we’re living in a world that is so incredibly uncertain already as it is. It feels like a lot to ask us to also embrace uncertainty in the tiny things that we can control, or that we feel like we can control in our life path. What role does uncertainty play here? Because it feels like a lot of this is about giving up control.

01:01:03

Abby Krom:
It really is. You don’t have to embrace uncertainty, but we do have to accept it as a fact of life. We spend a lot of time trying to deny just universal realities and like I said, we’re giving people the illusion that you can go through life without uncertainty. If you want to become a doctor, you know what? Uncertainty is gone. No, I speak to people who are in medical school. I have a lot of doctors in my family. It does not get rid of uncertainty. So again, this is one of the lies we tell ourselves. So you don’t have to embrace it. Maybe it’s more pleasant if you do, but we do have to accept it as a reality. That even when, if you pick a really steady course, that we will get detoured. So if we can say … I really liked something a mentor told me, which is, “We’re limited by the feelings we’re willing to experience.”

So if we are not willing to experience uncertainty, we will have a limited life because we will only choose safe things that we think we know, which again, even if you choose the safest thing, you can get blindsided. We limit our experience by saying, “You know what? I’m not going to even take that risk because I can’t tolerate.” There is that moment when you like, let’s say you send out a job application and you have to wait for the response. That is unbearable.

01:02:19

That we’re just like, “Well, that was unpleasant. So I’m going to avoid that at all cost,” but if we can actually tolerate that experience and in a way accept it and not try and make it different than what it is, we can have a more expansive experience. So if you’re unwilling to feel disappointment or loss, you will live a limited life and it will provide less opportunities for joy.

Jasmine Bina:
So this is just an exercise in being willing to feel the full spectrum of emotions and accepting them for what they are?

Abby Krom:
Yes, exactly.

01:02:54

Emmett Shine:
We’re part of that, 20th century hustle culture, work by any stretch means, whatever and I didn’t like how I think it had designed my life. I didn’t have balance. I didn’t have as good of a relationship with my parents who, as I got older, I was more able to understand what they had gone through. I think it was hard for me to be present in relationships. I think a lot of, when I turned 30, I didn’t want to be like that as much. I think that is probably one of the personal inspirations for Pattern was trying to make a culture of business and all that, that I’d grown up in that was more supportive of just reframing goals and balance. It’s not all about money and making money. I understand maybe it sounds easier if you can have a little bit of money, but I do think that’s our goal in America, but it doesn’t make you more fulfilled.

Interesting Links & More Reading

Categories
Podcast

5: The Emerging Languages and Symbols of Social Medi‪a‬

We speak with Sony Pictures Television executive Erin Weinger and clinical psychologist Dr. Therese Mascardo about the passing of the current age of social media and the beginning of another. Any time a new age is born, the rules get harder, the audience becomes more discerning, and all of us - people, brands, identities - are separated into those that move ahead and those that are left behind. The question now is, what is this new age that we’re walking into?

Podcast Transcript

Jan 16, 2020

50 min read

The Emerging Languages and Symbols of Social Medi‪a‬

00:00

Jasmine Bina:
Welcome to Unseen Unknown. I’m Jasmine Bina. Something is happening in social media. Let me ask you a few questions. Have you ever tried to explain Instagram to somebody of an older generation, maybe a parent or a co-worker? And you found that even if you could get them to create an account, that they only passively consume content, they never actually create it and become a part of the community? Do you find that now, maybe you’re that person on TikTok? You can enjoy the content and get a good laugh, but you just don’t know what you’re supposed to upload? Have you on social media found your own subgroups, your niche communities, your subcultures? Have you become literate in the specific languages and aesthetics of those tribes? Do you somehow just know to read between the lines of a post? Or when you see a post that you don’t fully understand, do you know that there’s something more there that you’re not privy too? As a brand, are you tapped into all the secret languages and symbols of your space that have started to evolve past their beginnings?

We are living the current age of social media and entering a new one. Our symbols and our languages are changing. And anytime a new age is born, the rules get harder. The audience becomes more discerning. And all of us, people, brands, identities, we’re separated into those that move ahead and those that are left behind. The question here is, what is this new age that we’re walking into?

01:41

Erin Weinger:
There’s always been certain symbols and certain things in society that you just kind of look at and you immediately know who you’re dealing with.

01:50

Jasmine Bina:
This is Erin Weinger. She’s a journalist, an author and a strategist who’s worked at places like The LA Times, The Hollywood Reporter, and Vogue Australia. She’s also company-authored some pretty influential books with huge online influencers like Aimee Song, and she has a new book coming out with Tracey Cunningham. She’s currently Vice President of Social Editorial at Sony Pictures television, where she’s in charge of the overall brand story and communicating it to the Sony Pictures global audience. I talked to her about the symbols we see everywhere on social. Symbols like millennial pink, and Gen Z yellow, the VSCO girl which I just recently learned is not pronounced V-S-C-O. Normcore, the hypebeast, the basic bitch, hotdog legs, wellness shots in bathtubs or saunas. Whether there’s flash or not, using native filters or filter apps, our camera angles. Certainly emoji is their own languages. All the signals that can be caught in a subtext of the decisions that we make on social. These symbols, where do they come from, and how do we know them?

02:55

Erin Weinger:
It’s a really interesting question. I think that there’s always been certain symbols and certain things in society that you just look at and you immediately know who you’re dealing with, why you’re dealing with it, the brand associated with it. But I think on social media, it’s been super interesting to watch these things, because you have nine squares to show who you are. That’s your business. So I think that if you are building a brand, or you are building your own brand, or your own persona, that flash is going to show people, “Hey, I’m kind of cool. I know how to wash out a photo.”

I was explaining to somebody who’s not on social media the difference if you had two restaurants. And you have your nine squares to truly communicate whether or not this is a place that is going to give you socially currency if you tag it or not. So I think that all of these symbols, I don’t even think that they’ve come up purposely, quite honestly. I think that just by nature of Instagram and social media, a lot of things kind of bleed into each other. We don’t even really know why we post the things we do and where they come from. They’ve just started to become symbols unwittingly because an influencer might post using a certain look, a certain pose, a certain washed out background. And now you have 100,000 other people doing it. And then their followers are doing it. And so it just snowballs into something that is meaningful without trying.

So I think that trends are being formed by influencers, by media companies, by brands, by restaurants, by all of these people without really even trying. And they become a symbol of this is cool or this is not.

04:44

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. You know what’s really interesting too is I feel like those nine squares have become real effective shorthand.

Erin Weinger:
Absolutely.

Jasmine Bina:
… for what a brand is about. Because we do so much brand research for competitors, for our clients, even user research. And the fastest, most effective way for me to understand what a brand or a person is about is to just follow their Instagram. That’s just the first thing I do. I learn more by reading between the lines with those images than I do with anything else.

Erin Weinger:
Absolutely.

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah.

05:13

Erin Weinger:
Because I think it really is a curated glimpse into somebody’s mind. How are they thinking? What are they choosing to portray to the world? What message do they want to send? I think it goes that way whether you’re a brand, whether you’re an individual, whether you’re a media company, a publication. You have to constantly be thinking about … even if you’re not thinking about it, you are thinking about it. What am I portraying in my grid? What is the first thing people are going to think about me when they look at those squares?

05:42

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. So you come from the world of media, right? So you come from traditional publishing, big publishers. What you’re describing in terms of how the language evolves in social versus the language that has evolved let’s say in fashion, which some of the publications you’ve worked at is really different. Because in fashion, you have gatekeepers, you have people who set trends. I remember being in grad school, and this woman came in to give a talk about being a trend forecaster. I was like, “Damn, I want that job.” And it became irrelevant by the time I graduated. Grad school was two years by the way. That’s how quickly trend forecasting meant nothing. And people still write about how there’s no point, because trends come and go so fast. It’s hard to even tell if things are trends. They can spread like wild fire and then just dire. And then there are things that spread, that are trends that have way more lasting power, that reflect something deeper, and the cultural zeitgeist, or whatever people are talking about, or feeling, or ready to embrace.

But what you’re saying is happening on social, because it’s not gatekeepers and a select few that are making these decisions. It’s almost by accident it seems and these patterns emerge over time.

06:52

Erin Weinger:
And I think that is a lot of it. And I think that there are still of traditional checks and balances in place, where there are gatekeepers trying to be gatekeepers, and it’s not working. I think the nature of social media, and I have found this very much just by nature of some of the places I’ve worked. The red tape that traditional organizations try to hold their social media to, it doesn’t really work. Because you can’t plan for trends on social media, you don’t know what’s going to catch on. Who would thought that an egg would cause a worldwide phenomenon? I mean, there are things that happen, there’s no rhyme or reason for a lot of the stuff that happens. On the flip side, there is a ton of rhyme and reason for so many of these things that happen. So I think that it really is about finding that balance of how do you be fast and loose and let go a little bit, and have that intimate connection with your audience, and your mission, and your goal, to be able to just relax and put your authenticity forward in a way that just lets people who are meant to find you, find you and connect with you.

07:58

Jasmine Bina:
I don’t know where I’m going with this, but authenticity I feel like-

Erin Weinger:
I hate that word.

Jasmine Bina:
We all hate that word.

Erin Weinger:
We all hate that word.

Jasmine Bina:
Why do we hate it?

08:08

Erin Weinger:
Because the sheer nature of the overuse of it I think has become unauthentic. Inauthentic. I said the wrong word. Inauthentic. I think that it used to a lot of the things, and this is another kind of I don’t want to say a downfall of social media. But this idea of everyone has to be authentic. People are trying so hard to be authentic that they’re not actually asking themselves the questions of well, who am I? What is my brand?

08:38

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. You’ve hit on something really, really smart here. So yeah, I would argue that authenticity isn’t enough. Because I don’t even know that people are interested in the entirety of a brand on social, or the entirety of a person’s life on social. They come to you to meet specific needs. If they need to be inspired, if they need to be educated, if they need to be directed, if they need to tap into something, into some subculture and to understanding something that’s otherwise inaccessible to them.

People come to social, looking for these kinds of not currency, but this is a deliverable on social. This is what people need from you. I find that a lot of influencers or brands fail to understand that this isn’t about what it is that you want to project. But a good place to start is what do you think people are thirsting after? What is your audience looking for specifically?

09:34

Erin Weinger:
I am actually surprised by how many people I encounter day-to-day. I work at Sony. Within Sony, outside of Sony brands, clients I’ve had, the publications I’ve worked for. I am shocked at the number of people that do not start with what is my goal. And I think that people just kind of go. And that’s great, but you have to start with a goal. And I think that within that goal, one of the things you have to account for is what am I giving to my audience? Who is my audience? Who specifically are these people? And doesn’t have to be one audience, but I don’t think people really start with asking the questions to get the answers to allow them to actually cut through the noise on social. So I think that’s a big part of being authentic Again, it’s going back to knowing who you are. Who am I, what am I doing, and why am I here?

10:29

Jasmine Bina:
The other thing while we’re talking about authenticity that this is making me think of is authenticity requires you to take risks, right? So it’s not enough to just reflect to people what they actually want on social. But you have to give them a vision of the future. I described this example in the past, I don’t know which podcast episode it was on. But Chriselle Lim for example, she has this whole future vision about what the future of being a working parent looks like, right? She’s launching this coworking space. She comes from the world of fashion. She’s a self-made fashion influencer. One of the OGs, huge, has amazing collaborations. I’m going to get this wrong, but I think she just had a capsule collection with Nordstrom. She is taking a risk. I think she’s looked at her audience. She understands that they have matured with her over time. This is an older group. I mean older by millennial standards, whatever you want to say. They’re having kids for the first time, and they’re navigating this space. And they’re trying to negotiate what it means to be a working mother, but also wanting to have the life that they had before they became a parent.

And I might be projecting too much onto what this brand that she’s creating is about. But the fact that I can make so many assumptions about what this new co-working space will be shows that she is in a really good job of creating an authentic brand that has taken a risk in painting a picture of the future. And that’s the only risk that matters is risk that pushes us into the future. I think that she’s really done that.

11:51

Erin Weinger:
Yeah. I think it’s really what you just hit on for me talking about that is also modern brands move. They evolve, and they move, and they’re fluid, and they don’t stay the same. And I think if you think about a working mom in the ’80s, you go on maternity leave, you go back to your corporate office. You’re not evolving with the people around you. It’s just a very interesting concept of how everybody does kind of have an audience now. And they become you. You become them. And you move together, and you grow together, and you create this living thing that is always evolving and always changing. And I don’t that that is something that we’ve ever seen really happened before. Even with Coca-Cola, and Nintendo. It’s like you kind of stay the same, and then your core group ages out. And then a new group comes in. And that’s not how we think about it anymore. We don’t think about the next generation. We think about our current audience and how we move with them.

And I think that that’s a really interesting thing that social has given to us. And that’s allowed people to really stay true to who they are because you see all of these Chriselle Lims of the world, the Lauren Conrads of the world, the Whitney Ports of the world. All of these women who do really, they’re just them. They’re just kind of living their life. And they trust and take that risk that their audience comes to them because they too are living their life. And I think that that in itself is a new kind of risk that we haven’t really seen probably since the rise of Instagram I think has really allowed us to have brands that evolve with us.

13:28

Jasmine Bina:
Right. Okay. So you mentioned something interesting about your audience aging in and aging out, and thinking about new audiences, or catering to your old audience. The thing about symbolism and new languages emerging in a space or in a platform is that you start to have multiple languages and multiple sets of symbols. So I barely understood the VSCO girl. I think I only came across that because I was doing research. But I don’t think I would have seen her, or understood her, or realized that she was sending secret signals in her look. I don’t even use VSCO. And there’s a whole tribe of young girls that do.

14:05

Erin Weinger:
I never know. Is it VSCO or VSCO?

Jasmine Bina:
Oh gosh. That just shows you …

Erin Weinger:
I feel like it’s VSCO.

Jasmine Bina:
Sorry.

Erin Weinger:
No it’s fine. I don’t know.

Jasmine Bina:
All right. So we just made our point by me embarrassing myself.

Erin Weinger:
Well I could be wrong too.

14:21

Jasmine Bina:
No, you’re probably right. Jesus. Anyway. So she has a very specific look. And then you have other things like Ana Andjelic. She was one of our interviewees on a previous podcast. She wrote an excellent piece about how if wellness and health are the new luxury. It’s about having the resources to be able to take time out and unplug. But then you still have to prove that you’re able to do that. So you still have to document it and show it somehow. And that’s the weird tension in those things. You can’t just go to a spa and unplug. You still have to demonstrate it. It’s the whole picture or it didn’t happen thing. That’s why there’s such a rash of hot dog legs everywhere. Right? Which I’m guilty of having taken those photos myself.

Erin Weinger:
Have a lot of hotdog legs. Yeah.

Jasmine Bina:
Right? But you show hot dog legs to our parents, they’re not going to understand all of the subtext that comes along with that. So the bigger question here is how do we come to understand all this subtext? Is it because we’re just around in the ether, so we absorb these subtle cues? Or is it because somehow, there’s a codified way of understanding these things?

15:31

Erin Weinger:
I think yes. I think we understand these things because if you are on Instagram scrolling through a feed, you are just getting images all day long. You are inundated with messaging, and images, and videos. And again, it’s these trends that emerge. The more you see millennial pink, it wasn’t millennial pink when it started, it was pink. Pink was having a moment. So one decor blogger posted it. Another blogger took a picture of it at a coffee shop. Architectural Digest picked it up, and declared it a trend, and posted all the photos of it. Then all the designers who wish that they were featured at Architectural Digest reposted what Arch Digest posted, and now it’s millennial pink. So it’s the anatomy of a trend and how trends kind of bubble up. So I think the subtext comes, a lot of it still comes from it being anointed a thing.

So I think that again, we are inundated with images. And I’ve had this conversation with a best friend of mine who’s an interior decorator. And she’s an architectural designer. And she works at a very, very prestigious firm that is featured in Architectural Digest, and Elle Decor, and Vogue Living. And all the shelter mags, all the bloggers want to pay attention to what is going on at this firm.

16:49

She and I talk about where do interior trends come from. Because we all see the same things on Instagram. So are we making trends in the real world because we’re seeing our inspiration kind of mashed together, and we don’t even know where it’s coming from? Or are we getting trends from outside and bringing them to our social media because that is what we like? And I think the lines are a bit blurred. And I think especially when it comes in the fashion, the interior, the art, any creative space right now, the lines are kind of blurred. And I almost think that when I think of the future of social media and the future of creativity, I almost think we’re going to have to … and we’re starting to see this where a luxury as you’ve mentioned is unplugging. It is a luxury to be able to take a step away.

And I think that that’s something that is very much going to be vital to the future of creativity, where you really do take a step away because you are on vacation in Greece, and you are genuinely interested in the architecture, and the color of the terracotta, and the food that you are eating. Not because you need to document it, which obviously you will when you get home or go back to your hotel that night. But because you have to absorb it, because otherwise you have no creativity to give to what you do for a living.

18:11

And I think about this a lot. I have a term that I have coined, Silver Lake beige. Because everything feels very, and I know colors, and there’s a lot of color and texture, and interiors right now. It’s a very creative process obviously, designing an interior. But thinking about Silver Lake beige, I say that because you walk down the street in Atwater Village, in Silver Lake, in Culver City, in any of the creative little hubs around LA. And every storefront kind of looks the same. They have the same aesthetic. They have this kind of beigey, sophisticate, plain, minimal wood and macrame luck that feels like it was birthed from Instagram. So my question is kind of always chicken or egg, where did it come from? So I think it’s really interesting to think about the inspiration that we get from our feeds. And how do you balance and reconcile your true passion, and creativity, and ideas? Are you getting them from Instagram? Are they starting on Instagram? Is everything we’re doing all looking the same because we’re all posting the same thing without even realizing it?

19:28

Jasmine Bina:
So you mentioned something about Arch Digest that I think, I want to print it out because it’s a real device that you can use in brand strategy. And this idea of the fact that pink always existed, but when Arch Digest named it millennial pink, the act of naming something gives you ownership over it. And then it becomes a lot easier for the idea to travel, because so much is encapsulated in those words.

Millennial pink holds a lot of meaning. There’s a lot of subtexts about feminism, and a returning to innocence, and recoiling from the ills of modern society and all that stuff. Silver Lake beige I think is even more profound. Bravo. Because honestly, if you’re on the West Coast, you understand all of the layers of meaning in what you just described. It’s like you can watch Arrested Development and enjoy it. Or you can watch Arrested Development as somebody who grew up in Orange County and really feel it in your blood. Again, just layers of meaning.

20:27

But that’s something we talk to brands about sometimes is a lot of founders will come to us, and they won’t even realize that they have subconsciously created an idea, or a brand, or a company around something that’s happening culturally that hasn’t really been brought to the surface yet. They just have an intuition about it. And what’s great about our job is a lot of times we just bring that to the surface, and we name it, or we package it, or we put a bow on it. And then it becomes a thing that is easily identifiable. It carries all that subtext. So it does this huge, heavy lifting culturally, and then to be the one brand that brings that entire story to the collective consciousness, that’s adding value to culture. Right? And that’s pushing us forward. That’s a lot of what branding is. And I think your Arch Digest example is a perfect demonstration of that. So do you see any other symbols or languages coming up? I mean, there are so many subcultures. I mean, I didn’t even mention basic bitch and stuff like that. What are the things that you’re seeing that are kind of top of mind for you that are interesting right now?

21:34

Erin Weinger:
Top of mind that are interesting. That’s a very good question. I still think when I really think about the future of storytelling on social media, I do think that we’re going to have to do a little bit better. I think that the public and the general audience is getting really bored. I think that there’s a lot of noise to cut through. And I think about this every day at my job at Sony. How do we cut through noise to allow people to understand what the Sony brand is? And that Sony is a creator of premium television. Do I think that that can be done with low brow viral videos? Quite frankly, I don’t. I think that the era of being able to trick your audience into consuming is over. I think you have to do better.

I still think when I think of how do you tell an actual story on social media? I look at things. For example, The New Yorker just did an amazing, amazing collaboration with an agency in New York, where they built out user generated caption contest platform on Instagram. The New York Public Library, they partnered with Mother, another agency in New York and they-

Jasmine Bina:
I know Mother. They’ve done great stuff.

22:48

Erin Weinger:
Yeah. And I love what they did. They did this Instagram story novels come to life activation. And that’s something I think is incredibly, incredibly interesting. I look at last year, there was a really incredible, and I know that this can be a little bit polarizing, because there are a lot of people who actually did not like this. I thought it was absolutely brilliant. But an Israeli tech investor, biotech investor I believe. I could be wrong, but an Israeli billionaire and his daughter basically financed a feature film that they then spliced up into an Instagram story series about a Holocaust survivor, or a Holocaust victim I should say, that they asked the question, “What would it be like if somebody had social media during the Holocaust?” They essentially created a late-1930 set. They showed what it would be like if this girl, very much in the vein of Anne Frank. She was a real girl who sadly did not survive the Holocaust. They took her diaries. They took her story. They showed her life. They showed her life before. She was with her phone. She was with her friends. She was hanging out at home. She was going to go food. They showed what happens when the Nazis started to come through town, and people didn’t think it would happen to them. And they just kind of watched. And it progressed to the end obviously.

I thought it was brilliant. I thought it was brilliant because what’s so wonderful about Instagram, you have all of these things that there that are pretty putrid. But then you have this mechanism where there are seven or 800 million people who are potentially a captive audience to a message and a story. And something like that for me when you’re reading reports in the newspapers of children who don’t know what the Holocaust is. And every year, that number only grows because it’s not being taught. And here is a way to modernize a story and make it accessible for a different audience who knows how to consume content on this medium. So I think that it’s almost like you have to be platform-agnostic and think about what’s the story? Splice it up, cut it up, figure out what’s my story? Where’s the audience?

25:00

Jasmine Bina:
So you feel starting with the story is the most important?

25:02

Erin Weinger:
I think it’s absolutely vital. You cannot do anything without starting with a story. And I think that is what, when I think about where I see the future of social media going, especially in an election year, especially when there is a lot of stuff going on and a lot of anger surrounding the platforms on kind of where the world has ended up, largely because of what the platforms have allowed us to do. I think that we have to do better.

So I look at premium storytelling. The kind of storytelling that we’ve all been used to, and our parents were used to, and their parents were used to sitting and listening around the radio. Look at the golden age of podcasting. Look at long form and some of the beautiful stories that are coming out in the documentary space. I just think that people are going to hold themselves and brands are going to start holding themselves to a higher standard.

Even with content marketing, when you look at I think what REI, the outdoor company just did, they got rid of their catalog, and they launched a magazine. It is an awesome magazine. They have interviews, they have celebrity profiles, they have hiking guides, they have gear guides. And you can shop it obviously. But it so resonates with their consumer, and it’s so on-brand for their consumer. I think translating strategy like that into social media and portraying storytelling that connects to your consumer, brands are going to I think invest more heavily in that. And there will be more thought given into how you use that across all of your platforms across your site, across your social, across your newsletter. So you get the investment out of it. Because it’s not always cheap to create premium storytelling. That’s not to say I think the TikToks of the world are going away. I think there’s still room for viral dance videos, and throwing American cheese slices at the wall, and having it become a cultural moment. But maybe this is more wishful thinking than a trend I think we’re going to see. But I don’t think it’s important for every brand to jump on every bandwagon. I think it’s really important for brands to think about what’s the story, what’s the goal, and what’s actually the right thing to do here?

27:12

Jasmine Bina:
And speaking of the goal, I think the thing that a lot of companies, especially larger companies kind of, it’s a vital mistake that they make consistently. It’s that they see social as a sales channel or as a profit center. It’s none of those things. If you’re talking about storytelling, you really have to commit to the idea. This is a longterm investment in creating a halo effect over the brand that will encourage loyalty, encourage recall, recognition.

Erin Weinger:
That’s a very, very interesting point. I think for me and my work, I encounter executives all day long where I have to kind of explain how a brand story is exactly that, what you just said. It is an investment. It is investing in the future of your business. It is investing in the future of your audience. It is showing that you believe in your audience enough that they will evolve with you and they will continue to consume your product or convert into whatever metric you need them to convert into. And I think that I have a different perspective obviously because I don’t work in a startup and I am not around a lot of people who are making purchasing decisions, shall we say. Who maybe have been as immersed in all of this as we are currently. So there’s a lot of education, and there’s a lot of explaining, and there’s a lot of talking about why investing, or why this is an investment. I don’t like really the term content marketing. It’s really communities of interest. How do you build a community of interest, and how is that an investment for your business?

28:47

Jasmine Bina:
Wow. Even just using those words, exchanging those words immediately makes you think of approaching it very different.

Erin Weinger:
Absolutely. But that’s it. And it doesn’t have to be one group. It’s who are my tribes. And I think thinking back to symbolism, that’s really what it is. It’s tribes. It’s figuring out who are my people. And social media communicates that with a visual language. And I think that’s kind of the heart and soul of the story. How do I visually communicate who my people are and who I am so my people find me?

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, absolutely.

Erin Weinger:
Building a brand story is like just making an online dating profile. It’s easy.

29:29

Jasmine Bina:
Right. Okay. So you have a really interesting history in the influencer space. You’ve actually worked with some amazing influencers as a coauthor coming from your publishing world. Tell me a little bit about that.

Erin Weinger:
Yeah. So I co-wrote Aimee Songs, both of her books. Capture Your Style, which really was all about Instagram.

Jasmine Bina:
That was the first real Instagram book that just blew up.

Erin Weinger:
It did well. We were very happy with that. It did very well. And she has such an interesting perspective. Her blog is 11 years old, so ancient as far as bloggers go and influencers go. And she’s somebody who very much fell into it accidentally, truly. And working with her, and learning about her story, and her journey. And how she’s built, to say that she has built a following does not do what she’s done justice. We would be in a coffee shop in LA working on the book. She would post a picture of something. And the next day we’d come back, and there would be a line of people waiting to see her. So how she has done it. And again, I know we don’t like this word, but authenticity. Thinking about, she is somebody who she’s just herself. She’s eating her food. She loves her fancy clothes.

30:49

Jasmine Bina:
She talks about her anxieties, her fears of her body image.

Erin Weinger:
I always equate when you get to just kind of be, and just be you. She’s just breathing. She’s breathing and documenting it along the way. And I think she does it in a way that I don’t want to say she does it without trying, because it’s a lot of work. And it takes a big team of people to keep her running. But she really does it in a way that it’s her, she breathes. She enjoys it to the point where she keeps it going. And I think that it was a really good education for me to get a glimpse into the whole influencer ecosystem. Because quite frankly, she’s the best. She’s the biggest and the best. So I learned kind of from the biggest. And the best and working with her, DBA, with her management company. When I was at Vogue Australia, working very closely with our, we had our own in-house influencer team essentially. So we had a blogger cohort that we worked with, and we worked on branded content with them. So very interesting glimpse into very different sides of the coin from the management aspect, to the talent aspect, to the brand aspect, and how brands want to work with influencers. So it’s been really interesting for me to kind of see all sides of the industry.

32:03

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. So you have a leg in all worlds. Publishing, social media, influencing, now in actual, straight traditional media as well. So all these things that we’ve discussed, if we consider how influencers have been a part of and actually created this social media frontier, if we describe this as social media and influencing 1.0, what does influencer 2.0 look like?

32:30

Erin Weinger:
Influencer 1.0 feels very billboard-ey. I think influencer 2.0 again, when you about kind of what we were talking about, what we’ve talked about throughout this conversation about brands have to do better, influencers have to do better. It’s not going to be enough anymore to just hold a package of diet tea and make $500,000. I mean, for some people it will. Listen, that’s always going to be there. But I think if you really are thinking about again, what is my goal? If you are trying to sell something, how do you actually connect? How do you get your product into the lexicon of millennial pink, into the lexicon of Away luggage? Where you take a picture of your luggage, and you just got yourself into an exclusive little coven of people who are travelers. And that in itself is social currency because you can hop on a plane and see the world.

So I think that really again, thinking about doing better. To me, thinking about some of the things that are air quotes I’m giving right now, trending in the world. I think that intelligence is really the direction that I see things going. Maybe that’s just wishful thinking, maybe that’s me praying every night. But you think about poetry, and how poetry is so big right now and-

33:56

Jasmine Bina:
Well poetry is big now because of Instagram.

Erin Weinger:
Poetry. Poetry has been big since-

Jasmine Bina:
No, but poetry has had a huge revival among young millennials and Gen Z because of Instagram. And that’s why you have people like Rupi Kaur Gill, and R. H. Sin, and a whole number of other people that if you look at it, you kind of wonder are they creating poetry for Instagram? It’s very readable on Instagram.

Erin Weinger:
The answer is probably us. There’s probably all kinds of academics rolling over somewhere right now.

Jasmine Bina:
I truly don’t think that’s a bad thing. Or it’s very possible that these ones surface to the top because they wrote poetry that works really well on Instagram. I mean, it’s amazing poetry. I mean Rupi Gill, she’s selling out amphitheaters around the world and doing these spoken word performances that are just changing people’s lives. If you want to do the tattoo test, people are getting tattoos of these writers’ poems on their bodies. That’s the brand pinnacle, right?

34:55

Erin Weinger:
Poetry coming back into popularity, independent bookstores having such an amazing, it’s a golden age of independent bookstores because of Instagram. For me, that’s something that I think is beautiful. When I first moved to Australia, that was something that I noticed in 2015. I was like there are people buying books here, because there is no Amazon. And coming home now a few years later I’m like oh, people are buying books here too.

35:25

Jasmine Bina:
Part of that too is because, also, there’s been writing about this. Books are having a resurgence because it’s another part of that wellness and social currency that shows that I have the time to read a book. Also, books are being repackaged for social … we already know that makeup brands, and even R&D for makeup, and food, and even real estate is all being repackaged for social. Books are another one. So book designers have this new directive where they have to create Instagramable cover art in order for a book to sell.

And it was I believe, they had a designer who said that they are specifically creating for Instagram. A great example of this was Sally Rooney’s book Normal People, which went through the roof. Ironically, I read somewhere her characters would hate the fact that they were even part of, I’ll do the air quotes now, of an Instagram cool culture. But this was all pretty deliberate. Influencing 1.0 is pretty sophisticated. And what you’re talking about, from what I’m hearing is the next level has to kind of evoke some sort of when you say connection, that to me sounds like emotional response.

36:34

Erin Weinger:
Absolutely. And I think emotional response, that’s almost a given. You have to do something that will make somebody feel. And that’s something that in our day and age is not always the easiest thing to do. But I think bringing it back to kind of this concept of intelligence being a social currency, that to me feels very real. And it feels very yes, you want to take a picture of Sally Rooney’s books because look, you’re a reader. You’re a reader. You’re intelligent, you know what’s going on. And if you look at some of the book jackets that are really making waves right now, they’re all throwbacks. I feel like the fonts even that you look at remind me of a first edition Catcher in the Rye. They’re all vintage inspired fonts from a different time.

So I do think there are these trends emerging of we’re going back in time a little bit to when there was no Instagram. So it’s almost bringing this intelligence and this analog look and feel to life, and displaying it digitally. And I think that to me feels like a very big direction that influencing is going. How do you almost bring your persona offline? How do you build a following online to allow you to convert into something offline? Whether that be product, or conferences, talks, books. That to me feels like the future. And I mean it’s not the future. It’s happening. But I think the intelligence thing, reading, and poetry, and going back to school for another degree, and learning financial literacy, I think these are all the trends that we’re going to just start seeing more and more of. Instead of an influencer selling lipstick, we’re going to see the beauty brand trying to hit up the financial advisor who happens to have a big following on Instagram because she’s teaching women how to do their taxes. So I think that that to me feels like a big direction that things are moving.

38:29

Jasmine Bina:
This new intelligence, this new marker of status that people are looking to project about themselves, is a luxury in and of itself. It’s clear to someone in this space like Erin that influence and the very act of influencing others is evolving into something a lot more sophisticated. And this in turn will propagate the next generation of trends that every brand needs to be paying attention to. What I wanted to know now was what does this look like for influencers themselves and the consumers that they’re touching?

39:03

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Freedom is the new wealth and in the spaces that I’m in, which I’m kind of in two. So I’m in wellness. And then I’m also in the travel exploration space. You see that more and more.

Jasmine Bina:
This is Dr. Therese Mascardo. She’s a licensed clinical psychologist here in LA and founder of the wellness community Exploring Therapy. She’s also an influencer. And if you follow her on Instagram, you’ll see that Dr. Mascardo has a very specific brand. She’s in a unique position to talk about the cultural shifts happening in social because she’s both in the practice of mental health, and in the practice of building a social media brand

39:41

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I’m fascinated by what choices people are making now compared to generations before us. One of the things I recently read in an article is that millennials are choosing more and more to pick jobs that have personal fulfillment and meaning to them compared to jobs that pay them a lot of money. And I feel like our parents’ generation would have never done that.

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. We actually talked about this recently where that’s something that employers have to start thinking about. Because all of these benefits packages and compensation, all the things that were the levers that you would push and pull to attract a workforce don’t really work anymore. People are looking for meaning in the companies that they work for. Which I would argue actually makes the case for branding for a company. Because you have to convey that your brand is more than a job. It’s really about some ideal, or some belief, or some value. The things I talk about all the time when it comes to brand strategy, that people are willing to kind of, they understand that their job is, they’re giving their lives to their jobs.

40:38

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yes, it’s so much less transactional that it used to be. And it’s so much more nuanced. Because people don’t just want a company that pays them well and has great benefits. They want a company that they get a sense cares about them, cares about their wellbeing. And in the digital nomad world, right, where people are increasingly going into remote work, they want to know that their company offers them that type of flexibility. So that’s one of the things companies are offering is more opportunities to work outside of the office because they know that those workers are happier, and healthier, and more productive.

Jasmine Bina:
Right. So you’re a digital nomad. You have your own business. Businesses, I should say. So describe Exploring Therapy to me, because it’s growing and it encompasses so many things. But tell me, how would you describe it?

41:23

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Exploring Therapy is a wellness community designed to help people build a life they don’t need a vacation from. So we have conversations that cover a wide range of things. It’s not just about wellness. It’s not just about mental health and therapy in a box. But we really talk about lifestyle. We talk about how you spend your time, who you spend your time with, building community, things that are fulfilling and personally meaningful. And our goal is that we would help people live lives that are more healthy, free, and connected.

Jasmine Bina:
So would you call this a lifestyle brand?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I guess you can say that it is, although I didn’t intentionally start it that way.

Jasmine Bina:
Why do you hesitate?

41:58

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
When I think of lifestyle brands, a lot of times I think of an individual, and an individual who is showing off those kind of old school ideas about wealth, right? So they’ve got the Gucci belts, they’re in the bathroom taking pictures of themselves at a Shangri-La Hotel somewhere. And that’s definitely not what Exploring Therapy is about. And we have a whole manifesto where we talk about who we are. We’re warm people over cool people. Right? We think that kindness is the most important thing. So it’s really about character more so than just what you’re achieving that people can see.

Jasmine Bina:
So it’s interesting. Lifestyle is kind of a dirty word to you.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I didn’t realize until you asked me that, but I think it’s about the heart behind it, you know?

42:51

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. Cool. So you’re a therapist, and therapy is one of those definitely undisrupted spaces. I don’t care if there’s Talkspace or any other number of those startups, which I’ve researched for our clients in the past. They’re not really disrupting anything. Therapy is still therapy. They’re just creating little marketplaces for them. But you are creating a social media brand around being a bonafide therapist. And here’s how I would describe your brand, just on Instagram, let’s say. You go super deep sometimes. And then there’s a lot of levity in some of the things that you post as well. And then there’s a lot of you in the things that you post. And it’s an interesting trifecta of content.

What’s interesting to me is that you have a really engaged audience that really value that I’ve seen, they really value what you have to say. And I don’t think that the masses would have been ready for this kind of brand even 10 years ago. Something’s changed.

43:50

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I don’t think I was ready for this brand two years ago when I started it. Yeah. You’re so right. Mental health, therapy has been the same for about 100 years. And the stereotype was these old, usually white men with beards and glasses in cardigans, sitting on a leather sofa going [inaudible 00:44:08]. Yes. That whole idea. And I wanted to do something a little bit different.

And what I found back when I started Exploring Therapy in April of 2018 was I was looking for other mental health professionals and could barely find any. And it was because I think if I could speak for some of us-

Jasmine Bina:
You were looking for them on social media?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yes, on social media. So I was looking for other mental health professionals on social media. And I found that there weren’t very many. And my guess was that-

Jasmine Bina:
Two years ago? You’re just talking just two years?

44:40

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Oh yeah. Oh yeah. There were very few. And I knew because I was looking for colleagues to create community with on Instagram. And I found I don’t know, less than 10 psychologists that were on at the time that seemed to be putting any effort or energy into their social media accounts.

And I think it’s because a lot of us traditionally are trained to be the blank slate, and to basically be a non-presence. You’re just a white piece of paper for the client to project everything onto. So that was what we were taught as professional. And we were basically almost shamed for bringing any of ourselves into the room.

One of the topics of mental health as a professional that we learn about is self-disclosure. And basically, you’re only really supposed to self-disclose when it’s absolutely helpful for the client. Other than that, it was very frowned upon. So social media seemed like a thing we could just never do.

And I felt like we were missing this opportunity to connect with potential people in the world because we were completely silent on social media. So it’s been such an interesting adventure. Because for me, Exploring Therapy was about realizing that the therapy brand was antiquated and irrelevant to a lot of people. And my first intention was I wanted to rebrand therapy. I wanted it to look fun, engaging, fresh. I wanted to demonstrate that smart people, self-aware people are interested in mental health. And I could have never expected where things would go when I look at how it is today. There are so many mental health influencers. So many articles have come out in major publications that therapists are the new poets, Instagram therapists are the new poets. So it’s really made mental health conversations very democratized. Now everybody’s talking about mental health. And two years ago, I can tell you it was barely talked about.

46:33

Jasmine Bina:
Wow. Okay. So this sounds like it went from being a non-space to being a real space. Not just in social, but just the idea of what therapy actually is. Did your self-perception about who you are as a therapist change in the process?

46:46

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
5000%. Because like I said when I started, I was so scared to share personal parts about myself. And since then, I feel like I’ve really learned how to disclose in a way that moves the conversation with intentionality forward.

So I don’t share everything. There are certain things that I personally never share. You’re not going to see me talk about my personal friends very much, or my family. You’re not going to see me show the inside of my home or personal spaces in my life. And that’s because I have decided that those boundaries are healthy for me. But you will see me as a human being and as a therapist who loves food, who loves travel. And because I’m a digital nomad, it’s really opened me up to talk about that part of my life, without it being ‘off-brand,’ right? So that people who are following along aren’t going, “Why is she talking about this? She’s a therapist.”

47:37

Jasmine Bina:
Right. So you’re really cognizant of how the brand and the overall story that you’re telling are cohesive?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Absolutely. Yes. And I think the one thing that is maybe a little bit unique about me compared to other therapists who might be in the social media space is I made the choice back when I started that I wanted to be in multiple conversations. So I didn’t want it to just be a straight up mental health account. I want it to include elements of myself that fit with what I wanted to connect with people on.

So one of my favorite words in my entire life is delight. And I feel like my personal mission in life is to help people delight in their own lives and to delight in themselves. So that’s why I talk about food, and travel, and things that most of us dream about and enjoy.

48:20

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. So food, travel, they’re the easier topics. Mental health gets a little bit more hairy. But let’s talk about the macro state of mental health in our culture over the last few years. So I feel like social has become a really, obviously so many movements started on social. A few years back, you had things like the Arab Spring or Occupy Wall Street. There were very empowering. They were gritty, and they forced us to see things we didn’t want to see. But they gave hope in a lot of ways.

This year, it felt like it was a little different. I’m interested in asking you this both as an influencer and as a therapist. It felt like 2019 was taxing. You had the MeToo movement, which was important and empowering. But it was emotionally taxing to just constantly be confronted with the suffering of women. It’s important. We all need to pay that debt, but it’s a lot. Let’s not deny that it’s a lot.

And then you had things like outrage culture, cancel culture, things that you could argue are both positive and negative. It’s the wild west right now of this space, when it comes to cultural movements. Some come and die really fast. Others have lasting impact. As a therapist, how do you feel like these narratives that were born on social really affect us as a society?

49:46

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Well, some of the things you talk about make me think about the idea of different types of trauma. So we can experience trauma on an individual level. We can also experience trauma on a societal level, on a cultural level. So I think we’re running into some of those things. The MeToo movement is essentially a group of people who experienced trauma and who are trying to walk through that conversation and through their own healing together publicly. So we never had that before. That didn’t exist.

And the other thing that I’ve noticed is that social media has given people the opportunity to react at lightning speed. So we’re more reactive than ever before. And that is in some ways really beautiful. And in some ways, it could be really unhealthy. So let me give you an example.

50:36

So when we look at reactivity, one of the things to think about from a neurological perspective is that people are in their amygdala. So they’re in the fear center of their brain, which is designed to help them survive. Right? So that’s why when people are afraid or reactive, or when they’re anxious, they’re not thinking about things like, “What do I want for dinner on Tuesday?” Right? They’re thinking about how can I protect myself, and their body is going through all these physiological reactions in response to that, right? So their body’s essentially preparing them for fight or flight. And that’s what we’re running into with the reactivity we see on social media is that people are in that fear space. And the problem with that is that when people are in their amygdala, so when they’re in fight or flight, they’re not in their frontal lobes. And the frontal lobes are the place in our brain where we are able to have executive functioning, reasoning. The parts of ourselves that when we think about who am I at my very best, that all exists in our frontal lobes. It’s the most mature part of our brain. Whereas the amygdala is in our reptilian brain. Just oriented around eat, sleep, sex, survive. Right? So I think that we are in some ways selling ourselves short, because we don’t have as many opportunities to just sit and think about things and come from a more rational place.

51:56

Jasmine Bina:
It makes sense now that things like ASMR, and even a lot of people don’t know this. But after 9/11, the Food Network had to completely rethink all of their programming because people started watching the Food Network like crazy because they were looking for comfort.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Self-soothing.

Jasmine Bina:
Yes. Self-soothing. So all these self-soothing phenomena, again born on social, I mean I don’t think it would be too farfetched to say that their reaction to this environment that you’re describing. Right?

52:28

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
So what’s interesting to me about that is a lot of self-soothing are sensory experiences. So the ASMR is all about hearing. And food, all about taste. They’re real experiences, whereas we live in a very unreal world so much of the time. Right? And I find that it’s because we’re probably craving more of that realness because we have so little of it in the real world.

The other thing that I think is really interesting and I just connected this thought right now, is that when you think about mindfulness, mindfulness is also very focused on the experiencing of the presence through senses. So mindfulness is something that has exploded as well with Calm, and Headspace, and all these apps that have skyrocketed. Everyone is obsessed with mindfulness. Why is that? I think it’s because these things help us move out of our amygdala into our frontal lobes. When we are present, when we’re connected to our senses, when we’re grounded. So maybe people were gravitating towards those things and I didn’t even realize why. But now we know it’s because we’re trying to move back into the frontal lobes and heal ourselves out of that survival space in our amygdala.

53:39

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, absolutely. So this is interesting then. Would you say that this environment that we’re all digitally swimming in has affected the way you engage with people as an influencer?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Oh my gosh, in so many ways. I don’t even know where to start. I think that one is I’m having more conversations with people than ever before. I think we used to have in wellness at least, and in medicine, we had a model of the doctor as expert and authority. And I mean, think about it. When we were growing up, did you ever think about picking a doctor that you connected with personally? No. You went to the doctor that you were supposed to go to, whoever you got assigned. Because they were a doctor and they were supposed to know what they were doing. Now, I think people are changing and they see that they want to relate to their medical professionals and their mental health professionals. They want to feel like you’re a real person they can connect to.

54:38

Jasmine Bina:
I feel like part of that, if I can interrupt, it’s because we’ve lost some trust in the Western medical system. That’s why I’ve written about this. That’s why things like Goop have room to breathe because a whole class of people, notably females, felt like they weren’t listened to. So they’re open to pseudoscience now because they’re looking for empathy in medicine.

What you’re describing is empathy in medicine with your own brand as well. I check Yelp reviews to see what a doctor’s bedside manner is like before I choose somebody. It’s not enough to just see who your medical or your insurance provider covers anymore.

55:17

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Exactly. So it’s moving away from the professional as expert and authority to the medical or mental health professional as guide, and friend, and person that’s sharing the road with you. And it’s really rewarding, right? Because I think from the professional side, the people that gravitate toward me really know who I am, and they kind of come in. By the time they’ve asked for therapy, they already know me and they know how I work. And I think from the client side, you really get a sense of who you get to work with. and it feels familiar and safe.

Jasmine Bina:
That’s actually a super interesting. Okay.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
You talked about trust. So you’re right. People are at an all time low with trust with medical professionals. And I’m actually part of a new group, and it’s called the Association for Healthcare Social Media. So I’m on the advisory council of this group of doctors and mental health professionals that has realized that doctors really need to close the gap. So they’re all on social media. I mean, we’re talking about dermatologists that have TikTok accounts, and they’re telling you all about your skin, and you’re learning facts about that. I saw a gynecologist talking about the education related to the herpes virus on TikTok with thousands of views, hundreds of thousands of views. So I think it’s really great that medical professionals are realizing that they need to gain back the trust of people, because they’re losing ground. So AHSM is trying to figure out ways to create guidelines for medical professionals that we can really gain that trust back.

56:50

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. Interesting. So there’s this issue of trust on one side. And I love what you’re describing here, and we’ve absolutely seen it in our own research from a consumer side of things. Where the doctor is no longer the expert. They’re really more of the guide. Or what people really want to feel at least that we’ve seen in, let’s say more a physical medicine, so not therapy. But the fact that the user wants to feel like they’re the expert, and they are employing a doctor to help them kind of discover their own path towards health. A lot of that also by the way is a change in definition and health altogether. Another thing that we’ve seen in our work is that health used to mean getting from negative one to zero, getting back to a baseline. Now people want to go from zero to positive one.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yes.

Jasmine Bina:
Health is not about feeling better. It’s about feeling your potential. It’s about unlocking something superhuman inside of yourself.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yeah. The way I describe it is moving from survive to thrive.

57:45

Jasmine Bina:
Yes, exactly. There’s another side to all this where okay, if we as individuals are the experts. I feel like especially in female categories, we’re reclaiming things that were taken from us. So body positivity, acne positivity, even mental illness. It’s about clawing back these territories that we were kind of forced to give up where we were defined instead of defining it for ourselves. Do you feel like social media had a hand in making mental health in these kinds of trends an acceptable topic? Or did it just make it popular? Did it popularize it? Was it the right time for it to blow up, or do you think that social actually was the vehicle that we needed in order for it to become a larger conversation?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I think it was kind of that magical timing of things. I think our community really needed the conversation, and then social media helped boost it. But I certainly think that it’s more than just a fad or a passing trend. One of the things that never happened before, but it happens all the time now because of social media is someone will share a meme about having anxiety. And I think that is so mind blowing. Because that would never happen in passing conversation the way that it does now. Now it’s so common. And it makes sense because most people at some point in their lives will experience anxiety, sometimes debilitating. So I love meme culture because it’s given people the opportunity to use humor as a way to destigmatize mental health conversations. I think that’s just one example of many, but really you’re seeing people self-disclose more about their own struggles. They feel permission to be vulnerable because they see that there’s a community that exists, that is willing to hold them and support them in that space.

59:28

Jasmine Bina:
Right. So I think if you summarize everything that we’ve discussed here so far, it feels like there’s a movement towards empathy. If I had to label it, that’s what I would say. But I don’t want to put words in your mouth. Is that how you would describe this?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I definitely think that empathy has become ingrained into the conversation. And in my field, I see it a lot obviously because we’re talking a lot about feelings and giving people permission to have feelings. But what I see with brands is that brands are really linking themselves to feelings for people.

01:00:03

One of my favorite brands that I think is connected to empathy as part of the conversation is Ban.do. And I think it has a lot to do with one of the leaders in the company Jen Gotch. Jen Gotch is this incredible woman who is a force of nature. But one of the things I most appreciate about her is that she speaks openly about struggling with mental illness. And if you look through her posts, she will go into long descriptions of how she’s suffering from depression and from anxiety. And she is so real. So I love that you have a brand that is about helping people be their best. When you look at it, it’s very bright, colorful, sunny, cheerful. And then you have this leader who is also very open about kind of her shadow side, the dark stuff in her life too. I think people really relate to that, and it connects with them on an emotional level.

The other thing I’ve noticed is the art of the apology when it comes to brands. I pay a lot more attention to brands when they mess up. And I think we have less tolerance for brands that don’t know how to say sorry well. I sure do. So when a brand messes up, I actually think that’s normal. I think they’re going to have times where they miss the mark or they have an ad that it falls flat. But the way that they apologize to me matters a lot, because it communicates whether they care about me or whether they don’t care.

01:01:26

Jasmine Bina:
That’s interesting actually. A while ago, and I’m going to include this in the show notes and everything we discussed with you and our previous interview, they’re going to be in the show notes for people who are listening. But there was a great Hidden Brain episode where they talk about the proper way to apologize, just because there’s been such a rash of apologies because celebrities and brands are screwing up left and right. But so many of these public figures, the mistake they make with these apologies that we subconsciously pick up on is they’re the people who apologize by talking about how sorry they are about what happened to them because they screwed up. Then there are the people who start an apology by acknowledging how much they hurt you by screwing up. I’d say if I had to figure out the balance, I think brands are doing a little bit better than celebrities when it comes to apologizing the right way. But there is an art to the apology. There is a right way to do it that shows true remorse and a true commitment to changing your behavior in the future.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Then there’s the whole other side of things where brands make it part of their brand where they don’t give an F what you think.

01:02:30

Jasmine Bina:
Like who are you talking about?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Oh gosh. There’s a small brand here in LA. My friend Nguyen Tran, he has a food brand. And he had a restaurant called starry kitchen. And he kind of made a joke. When people would write bad Yelp reviews, he would get really sassy with them in the comments. And it kind of brought him more attention because he would just not take their crap.

I think people note Yelp reviewers have, it’s a double-edged sword because I love Yelp reviews and I love to read them. But also, Yelp reviewers can seem a little bit finicky sometimes. I don’t like the font on the menu-

Jasmine Bina:
Especially when it comes to food. And in fact, especially when it comes to international cuisines, another article I’m going to link to here, I think it was on Eater about how Americans hold foreign food places to a very different standard. To call something authentic, it’s a different standard they hold them to, and it’s created a lot of problems in the Yelp sphere for how these people, like your friend who’s the founder present their cuisines to the public. I’m going to link to that too. But it’s so interesting that you mention that. Yeah.

01:03:34

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yeah. And I just really admired him because he was being real and himself.

Jasmine Bina:
Authentic.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yes, authentic-

Jasmine Bina:
It’s that word again, authentic. So to bring it back to empathy, if I talk about the snowflake generation, what does that make you think?

01:03:48

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I have mixed feelings about it. Because on the one hand, I think that I love how culture has become so inclusive and accepting. And I think there’s so much beauty in that. The fact that people ask what your pronouns are and that’s becoming a part of how we communicate, I think is very powerful. Because it says, “Hey, if I can make you more comfortable, I want to do that because it’s kind.” When I was in grad school 10 years ago, we did not even really talk about pronouns. So culture has shifted a lot. And I think it is shifting in many ways toward kindness.

When I think about the snowflake generation, it’s this idea that people are offended at everything. And I have strong feelings about that. Because while I totally respect if someone hates the president, or is really offended at something that someone said, what I’ve noticed is that we’ve lost this appreciation for the process. So we have lost respect for another individual’s process. In other words, instead of me giving you the space for you to take your thoughts and opinions from A to Z, I now just expect you to be where I am. And I actually think that’s disrespectful to our humanity.

Now don’t get me wrong. If someone has opinions that are racist and homophobic, I want them to change their mind. But I think as a therapist, one of the things I value is meeting people where they’re at. And I think sometimes, the snowflake culture misses out on that. Because there’s this expectation that you should just instantaneously believe what I believe.

01:05:24

Jasmine Bina:
I agree. I think a lot of these phrases like the snowflake generation are really misnomers. And they hide the fact that there’s so much more going on that we don’t understand it.

I heard two things when you were describing that. One, it’s kind of mischaracterizing the fact that in our quest to show kindness and respect to other people, it seems like a hyper-defensiveness. And then the other thing that you mentioned is that it’s such a shorthand. It begs the question, do we give people space to actually go through this process that you described, which is so, so important to us.

Something else I wanted to ask you was what do you think the role of the influencer will be in the future? And this is a big one. And the reason I ask you this is because something came up in my feed a while ago that I haven’t been able to get out of my head. I’ve been wanting to talk to the right person about it.

So Gabor Mate, and I hope I’m saying his name right. He’s an addiction expert. He’s an author. He’s a speaker. He has incredible videos online where he’s given interviews about a world of different things. But he had an opinion about our children are the first generation that’s growing up. And their role models are not older people. They’re role models are their peers, these other young kids on social. And other young kids on social are not emotionally developed. Right? It’s huge. It’s like a huge mind bomb.

01:06:44

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Also you just made me think of okay boomer. okay boomer. They don’t trust the boomers anymore. They want to look to their peers.

Jasmine Bina:
You’re so right. You’re so right. And that’s what it is. But the people that they’re looking up to are not fully developed people yet, and they’re idolizing them. And this is a huge experiment. Can you grow up to be a healthy, well-adjusted individual if your role models are not healthy, well-adjusted individuals just because they’re still kids? What do you think about that?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
My sense is that the influence of the future, that it may actually bounce back. One of the things I’m seeing in mental health is that people are actually really drawn to accounts that show maturity and a journey in the therapist. One of my favorite accounts is called Notes From Your Therapist. And they’re a series of handwritten notes from a therapist that is probably a 40 or 50 something, if not a little bit older. And they are some of the most beautiful, empathic, thoughtful reflections as if she’s writing to her clients. And it’s a beautiful account if you haven’t seen it. But she is a demonstration of an older therapist with maturity and experience, yet her followers are not all her age. There’s a lot of younger folks that I think are drawn to that wisdom. So yeah, I think it’s bouncing back.

01:08:05

Jasmine Bina:
So speaking of authenticity, we know that’s important. I feel like I really just have to ask this because it’s important. You’ve given so much great insight and advice. But if I asked you to actually articulate advice that you would give to others who are building their own brands on social, what would be your top tips?

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
A lot of people building brands on social are DIYers, and that’s really who I speak to. So I think one of the most important things that you can do is get educated about brand on the front end. One of my favorite books is Building a StoryBrand by Donald Miller, which helped me really understand some concepts about brand. So I would say take time on the front end to educate yourself and be really thoughtful about your element. So understand why you might pick certain colors, and understand what tone you want to use when you speak to your audience. I think that I have a document that’s probably 45 to 50 pages of all the different things I pulled that I connected with and resonated with when I was creating the Exploring Therapy brand. And obviously, we titrated it down to the essential elements. But that really helped me understand what I was doing and who I was speaking to. I think that’s really important.

01:09:05

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. What you’re describing here is something you’ve talked about our process. And I think in our first episode, where so much of brand strategy is just going super wide and then finding ways to come back and get very narrow once you can see what your whole world looks like. And that’s what you’re describing here.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Yes, absolutely. And then to that point, I think sometimes we’re so narrow. And using a visual example, it’s like I can only use these three fonts, and that’s it. And then we forget to leave room to grow. And I think one of the things I’ve learned in my own brand at least is that you’re actually not always benefiting from staying so rigid. That actually, you have to build a little bit of room for pivoting in your brand because things are moving so fast. So you’re taking your clients, your audience on a ride. You can either do that in a way where it literally never changes. You can do it in a way where you’re taking sharp left turns and it’s very bumpy. Or you can do it where you’re taking them on a ride. And sometimes you’re taking a curve and a turn here and there. Certainly in the mental health field, there’ve been so many curve balls. So I’m grateful that I’m the only one making decisions and I can kind of shift what people might connect with instead of just staying rote and staying in the routine of just doing what I’m doing, because it’s my brand. Does that make sense?

01:10:19

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. Well if you build a rich brand, your users are going to give you the permission to make those turns. When you don’t put the work in, people aren’t going to get it when you make those pivots.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
I love the way you said that.

Jasmine Bina:
Okay, cool. So this was a very full, rich, enlightening conversation. I like to end these interviews with something personal. At the end of our episode, whoever the last person is that we’re talking to you. I’m going to ask you a personal question. I already know the answer to this, and I’m very excited and honored that you’re going to share this with us. But tell us the story of how you came to become a therapist and how you came to decide that you were going to turn your practice into something like exploring therapy.

01:11:01

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
When I decided to become a therapist, it was kind of out of innocent reasons, I suppose. I just loved people, and I’d always loved having coffee conversations with folks. And when I realized I could get paid to do that, I was like wow, that’s amazing. And as I’ve grown, one of the experiences I’ve had in my life that has impacted me the most in terms of why I do what I do is the experience of loss.

So in 2009, I lost my brother. I was already a mental health professional at the time. So there was added complexity to the experience. But it was September of 2009, and he ended his life. And it was one of the most tragic, horrifying, difficult, raw, unexpected things I could have ever experienced in my life. And I experienced all the things you could possibly imagine. Not just deep grief, but also the shock of it all and the losing my grounding and not knowing where to go.

So what Exploring Therapy has become for me is this conversation about helping people to delight in their lives, to have lives that are more healthy, is really about never wanting a person to ever lose sight of their own value and their own worth. And to never lose sight of the beauty of this gift of life that they have.

So I think that if I can help one person to find and reconnect with the value in their own life, that will be meaningful to me, that will be my mission happening. But I just never want someone to lose someone in their lives they care about again for things that can be avoided. So if I can help make mental health more accessible, if people can openly share about their struggles with suicidal thoughts, if we can create a space for this conversation, then I feel like it’s so worth it. All the work to create this is worth it to me.

01:12:53

Jasmine Bina:
Amazing. Thank you so much for that. I really, really appreciate it, Therese.

Dr. Therese Mascardo:
Thank you.

Interesting Links & More Reading

Categories
Podcast

4: Look To The Future To Understand The Presen‪t‬

We’re used to looking at history in order to understand the present, but what happens when we look to the future? In this house episode we conduct ‘100 Year Thought Experiments’ - a simple mental device for brand strategists - to better understand the current cultural mechanics of health, careers, environmentalism, and food.

Podcast Transcript

Jan 02, 2020

35 min read

Look To The Future To Understand The Presen‪t‬

00:00

Jasmine Bina:
Welcome to the Unseen Unknown Podcast. I’m Jasmine Bina, and today, Jean-Louis and I are having a discussion about Thought Experiments in Brand Strategy. Thought experiments are an amazing tool you can use to do lots of things. They help you in understanding user behavior. They help you in understanding value systems and beliefs. You can use them as a tool for creating new narratives in a space and to start building a brand that will change a larger conversation.

We cover a lot of topics in this one, and it’s a little bit of a rollercoaster ride, but it demonstrates where this exercise can take you and your work and understanding people and cultures. We talk about the fact that maybe working and having a career aren’t actually ethical pursuits. And if that’s the case, how are people changing their perceptions around productivity and their place in society today. We also discuss our rapidly changing relationships to food and specifically animals and why, if we know the way we consume food is harmful, do we still do it.

01:10

In this conversation, we uncovered the mental triggers and emotions that allow us to act in such contradictory ways, which applies to any brand in any space, not just food. That led us to a discussion about the environment and social responsibility and how certain brands are playing the environmental card, but it may come back to haunt them later. And lastly, we talked about wellness and mental health, one of my favorite topics, because it reveals how our deepest values as a society are changing. We went to a lot of interesting places and I promise that something in this episode will apply to your own work and understanding of your users.

So thought experiments actually come from the world of science I think even before science, they came from the world of philosophy and they’re very simple. It’s the idea that we take a hypothesis or a belief or some sort of like projection and we ask ourselves, if this happens in X amount of time, what are all the other things that are going to happen. In brand strategy, which is a really interesting application for this kind of thing, it’s as simple as saying, if this number one player was taken out of the market, if we introduced a new audience, if we changed the product in this way, in two to three years, what are all the other things that are going to happen because of that one change?

02:33

So it’s taking hypothesis and playing it out over time. What’s interesting though, is when you take the idea of thought experiments and apply them to culture, when you apply thought experiments to culture, it reveals a lot about behavior and beliefs and mental models and value systems that you may not have seen otherwise that can help you in defining a better brand that’s more strategic and defensible. What’s even more interesting than that is when you create 100 year thought experiment that goes to the extreme. And Jean-Louis that’s something that you introduced to our agency three or four years ago that has been very beneficial to us.

03:09

Jean-Louis:
Yeah. So there’s this question that’s sort of haunted me for the best part of a decade. And it’s a really simple question. I was asked by this philosopher Slavoj Žižek who’s, I think it’s Slovenian, very outspoken philosopher. But it was just the essence of this question, which was 100 years ago today we look back and we’re appalled by the things that we did. So 1919, you had an incredible amount of institutional racism, sexism, a lot of oppression at a society level, at a country level, just all sorts of pretty terrible things. I mean, it was not a fun time to be around.

The point is, is that we look back and it’s very clear that these things are completely unacceptable by today’s standards. But in a 100 years from now, that’s probably also going to be the case. We’re going to look back on today and say that the way things were is also unacceptable by tomorrow standards. And so the real question is, if we just take 100 year perspective on where we are today and ask, what are the sort of moral atrocities that we’re committing today that we don’t realize because it just seems normal to us?

04:14

Jasmine Bina:
Right. The thing about thought experiments is that they require a lot of imagination because sometimes you can’t even see the atrocities around you because it’s basically in your environment. It’s kind of like the air that you breathe, it’s not understanding that you’re efficient water. And there are some interesting ones that I think culturally we could explore that would cover a lot of ground. So I know I have some in mind, what are your big ones?

04:37

Jean-Louis:
I think the big one that’s sort of become clear to me over time is this idea that right now we have to work to survive. Like for a lot of people their food and shelter is contingent on turning up at 9:00 AM on Monday morning. And that’s sort of that locked into this situation, whether there’s a very small cost for them potentially to move to a new place where there’s maybe a better job or even just quitting that job and trying to apply for something better, they can’t because they’re very much locked into a survival mechanic with their work. It’s quite possible in 100 years, that may truly be a thing of the past. So there’s a few different factors at play here. One of them is the fact that with AI, especially, it’s quite likely there simply will not be enough jobs to go around.

A good analogy is you look at horses. I think at one point in the US in the early 1900s, there were more horses than people in this country and that’s definitely not the case now. And you can look at what a lawyer does, for example, it’s a great analogy. 80% of their workload is discovery, sifting through documents, finding patents, finding information that shouldn’t be there. That’s really the bulk of what they do. And that’s very easy to be automated and in a large part, it has. They’re already startups that are very successful at doing this at an equivalent level of a human being.

05:55

And so if you just take that simple analogy, 80% of lawyers could be replaced by AI without reducing the human presence. And I think that’s really the case for a lot of different fields. If you look at IBM’s Watson, they’re doing the exact same thing in medicine. Their goal is to develop an AI which can diagnose the human patients at an equal level to a board of doctors, and they’re getting pretty close.

And self-driving cars is sort of self-explanatory. You look at a state like Nebraska, 10% of the state’s whole economy is supportive infrastructure for trucking. So that’s the diners, it’s the motels, it’s the gas stations, all of these other jobs that are contingent on something, which is very likely going to disappear definitely within 100 years. And so the fact of the matter is that there could very likely not be enough jobs to go around.

06:44

And the other flip side of this is that there is enough money to support something like a universal basic income. You look at, I mean, really, taxes are a reflection of our priorities culturally speaking. One of the big things that people don’t realize is that right now, I think we’re at a multi-decade low in terms of internal migration in the United States. People just don’t move and they’re largely locked in. And the fact that health insurance is contingent on your job, creates huge incentives to stay put, and it really kind of limits people.

So you have this strange phenomenon where you have these big pools where there’s a lot of talent and not enough jobs, and then other cities where there’s tons of jobs and not enough talent. And we just don’t have enough sort of economic lubrication to free up that capital, and so having something like this can create a lot more wealth. But also, you look at AI and all these different platforms, and if we can tax these appropriately, and so some people are talking about a digital consumption tax, it’s very possible that this will be very reasonably affordable, at least in the kind of mid to long-term future. So the fact of the matter is that, it’s quite possible we end up with a scenario in 100 years where there’s a universal basic income that covers survival.

07:55

Jasmine Bina:
So, but we’re talking like we’re beyond Andrea Yang’s, a thousand a month. Like if we’re talking about taxing tech companies and there’s this huge glut of like immediate wealth, and if somehow that wealth was evenly distributed in the US, this isn’t about just surviving, it’s literally about not having to work. You’re not going to live like a king, but you can live without having to work.

Jean-Louis:
And I think like, I mean, just think about the level of human suffering of just the pressure, the stress, all of these different-

Jasmine Bina:
The depression, the not realizing your potential.

Jean-Louis:
I mean, a lot of people, think about how many people studied art and then had to get a job in a completely different field.

08:31

Jasmine Bina:
You know what? We had a client that was in the online education space and I did interviews with … they’re mostly baby boomers where their user base. Over and over again, when I kept hearing was these people felt that they were born artists, but they were living in a time where the story was, you’re either born with artistic talent or you’re not. Not that you can develop artistic talent, which is a story that us millennials grew up with.

So they basically quashed those real inclinations and passions that they had around art went on and lived a very different life in a very different field for 30 or 40 years, then they become empty-nesters and they return to art. It was a really tragic story, but I mean, literally culture had not given them permission to see their talents as something different than what they were being told. And so they completely lost on perhaps the most vital life experience that these people would have had. That’s what working to survive and cultural constructs in this kind of a narrative around what talent is, that’s what it does to a generation of people.

09:31

Jean-Louis:
I mean, if you compare it to someone whose maybe at the start of that career on 100 years from now, and they look at the fact that they don’t have to compromise, they can afford to explore and experiment. I think really today’s paradigm of working to survive, it’s the definition of compromise.

09:47

Jasmine Bina:
Right. So I think the big question now is, if we’re in this future tense 100 years from now, what is going to be the emotional consequence of not having to work for a living? And let me tell you why I ask that. One, that’s I think the big, as far as brand strategy is concerned or storytelling, or being a creator in this world, that’s what will really be the knock-on effect that we’re going to have to deal with. Two, we had a dinner party recently, and we posed this very same question and it elicited such strong responses. You had this one camp that felt like, yes, it is immoral to have to work to survive because in a capitalist society, what that is, well, this was my opinion.

In a capitalist society, what that is saying is that, we all have the same social mobility and economic mobility to do whatever we feel that we should do. And you’re rewarded for the value that you create. So if you’re poor, you deserve to be poor because you didn’t do something with that ability. That completely falls apart when you look at hidden labor, like taking care of a parent or raising a family, or even being a teacher, which is just so lowly valued, but is so tremendously big in terms of the value that it truly creates, but it’s not being quantified that way.

10:57

Jean-Louis:
All just the like the draw, you just happened to be born in the wrong neighborhood and those opportunities just don’t exist for you.

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, let’s not forget that. So that was me and a couple of people. Then we had other people who, it really rubbed in the wrong way. They felt that without work, we would have no meaning really. That work and creating value is the ultimate meaning of being here and being a member of society. And without it, we are pulling on one of the most crucial levelers and kind of undermining what keeps our societies going. I’m paraphrasing what they said. They’re going to hear this and disagree with how I paraphrase it. But like, those are kind of the two camps, like when people hear this and they either get angry or they get it.

11:40

Jean-Louis:
And I think, so Yuval Harari wrote a great article about this and really his kind of analogy for it is, is a game. If you look at the career, which is kind of so many articles, so much mind share right now about how work is the new religion. And really you can see this through the lens of a game. There is a lot of well-defined structures. Money is maybe the point system. The level that you’re at is the level of esteem you have in society. You really kind of, your self-worth is tied to how far along this career game you’re playing.

And that’s really the structure of how most people operate their lives. If you ask them who they are, they define themselves in this game of a career. And so getting rid of that, I think to a lot of people is kind of scary. But on the flip side, I think one interesting analogy that kind of escapes this discussion of career and money being defining yourself worth and meaning is, you look at influencers and you look at social media. We’ve started to create a new game. There is a new game around social influence, where now you’re defined by how many followers you have. And at a certain level you can start getting endorsements and deals and making a living out of this.

And this is, I mean, you could argue to some extent that it’s a career, but the mechanics are very different from how we typically define careers. And this is something that’s flexible, that’s accessible, that anyone can come in and play. And so I think there are alternatives that are starting to pop up, but it’s still to some extent an unproven model. And the other caveat, which is a big one to this, is that not everyone can be an influencer.

13:09

Jasmine Bina:
The thing about a career is I hear that word and that word has been kind of triggering for me because my definition of what my career is to me has been a big chasm between me and my parents. So I think a lot of listeners could probably relate to this. We work really hard as millennials. Work is our religion. It’s how we define ourselves. It’s like you said, very tied up in our self-worth, but our parents have a hard time understanding that. They really always felt that work was not who you were at all. Your work was just a job. It was something outside of your life. It’s something that you did to make money, to live your life.

And it points to the fact that a career is very much a cultural construct. It was something that was invented. And speaking of things that were invented, this discussion reminds me of, I don’t know if you saw this documentary recently that came out, I think on Amazon called Playing with Fire. Playing with Fire, so I’ll link to it in the show notes. But essentially, it’s this new movement that you’ve probably heard about in one way or another.

14:07

The acronym FIRE stands for Financially Independent Retire Early, and it’s super simple. You drastically reduce your spending costs. That means like moving in with your parents, not driving to work, cooking every single meal, super, super cheaply, like even like soaking your own beans and then radically increasing your savings rate so that you can retire in like five to 10 years. And in the course of all that obviously get out of debt. And it’s kind of like this backlash of the millennial generation to the consumerism that they were kind of spoon-fed while they were growing up.

What’s interesting about that documentary is not so much like what it’s trying to say with the movement, but it starts to uncover a lot of other cultural constructs around money. If you think about the retirement age being 65, that’s very new, that’s I believe after World War II, social security came out for its own reasons because now you had a whole class of people coming back from war and they were not employable, and the government needs to find a way to get them to retire. So they came up with a social security scheme, but it was actuarial analysts who came up with that 65 number and it was just about balancing a budget, it had nothing to do is the right time to retire or even defining what retirement should be.

And the other thing about this movement is that it’s really about decoupling money from happiness and treating it like a game, like you said. When you treat money like a game, your relationship to it changes and it doesn’t have that same emotional hold over you. And I think that’s what we’re talking about here. When suddenly you don’t have to work for that money, those controls disappear.

15:38

Jean-Louis:
No, 100%. This is sort of, if we play this forward in a society where for most people don’t have to work for a living, obviously a lot of people are still going to work, but one of the big questions is what do you do with your time? And definitely content creation and consumption is probably going to become far more prevalent in that. And a good way to kind of relate this to brands today is that a lot of companies are taking their product and turning it into an experience and really focusing on the experience of that product.

And really what they’re doing there is they’re turning a commodity and they’re turning it into content. I think that’s a trajectory. I mean, if this thought experiment holds true that that’s going to be true for a very long time from now that we’re going to be trying to turn as much as we can into content as a, kind of almost a replacement for the value and the stories that we tell ourselves with money.

16:32

Jasmine Bina:
So just hearing you say that makes me realize that content is probably going to wildly change in the next 100 years. Like it’s obviously going to be more immersive. And I don’t think this again comes back to something that I don’t know if I’ve talked about this in this podcast, but it’s not the technology that’s going to change. The fact that content will become more immersive, it’s the fact that we are ready to accept more immersive content and that’s what this is pointing to.

Jean-Louis:
That, but also the fact that this content is going to tell us who we are. There’s something, I think we mentioned this already in our podcast that, so many brands are starting to get to the level of identity where they’re becoming vehicles and proxies for us making decisions and kind of seeing who we are in the world. But content is kind of the leading era. I mean, this is already the voice and the medium most of these companies are doing. And if we look at this world view of how money and career in the large part have defined who we are now in the kind of vacuum of that, content and brand is going to do that for us.

17:31

Jasmine Bina:
This underscores something really important that I think is easy to miss in spaces like finance or career or work. I think when it comes to money or work, the stories are typically very practical and pragmatic. If you are a brand in that space trying to tell a story, you focus on features and benefits. But you should never lose sight of the fact that every decision that any human being ever makes, even if it’s like, which toothpaste to buy, is 100% emotional. And this is an emotional story that we’re talking about here. The way we relate to our work and to our wealth is emotional.

And I just want to point out, like you can even take it down to a scientific level. I’ve written about this before. So there was a study by a neuroscientist named Antonio Damasio, I did not remember that, I am reading it off of my screen right now. And this is a recent study, he discovered this a few years ago. He was studying patients that had lesions in the area of the brain where emotions are generated, right? So they were actually pretty normal people. Like you could have a conversation with them. You would never even know something was wrong.

18:28

Until you asked them to make a decision and they could not make a decision, and that doesn’t make sense. If you have all of your logical faculties and decisions are logical, these people should be super decision-makers, right? They can cut out all the noise, but the fact is they can’t. And the hypothesis is that logic and reasoning and information can help you get 90% of the way, but the fact is your brain knows you’re never going to have full, perfect information, so that last inch of decision-making has to be emotionally. It has to be an emotional journey that you have to take in order to make a choice.

And I just can’t underscore this enough. No matter what business you’re in or what industry, if you’re thinking about your brand, you have to start with the emotions. I don’t care if it’s like accounting software or you’re selling brooms or soap, whatever, the emotional piece is always going to be the deciding factor. Okay. So there’s so much more to talk about on that topic, but let’s move on. What’s another 100 year experiment that you think is revealing in terms of where our culture is now and what we value as a culture.

19:32

Jean-Louis:
One thing is kind of interesting, the treatment of animals. So we know culturally speaking that, or at least on a society level, that the way we treat animals is, it’s not okay. That there’s a huge amount of suffering and it really doesn’t have to be this way. We know it’s barbaric, but there’s so much cognitive dissonance that we can’t fully reconcile that at a cultural level. If it was accessible to become a vegetarian at a low personal economic cost, in terms of time and effort and money, I think then we would kind of be able to say that like, okay, this is terrible we’re not going to do it anymore.

But we’re still reconciling with that cognitive dissonance where we know it’s wrong, but we’re not quite there yet to change our behaviors around that. In 100 years, it’s probably quite likely that we’ll have a very different mindset about this, about how we know it’s wrong and we have significantly changed our actions about it. And those cultural and economic incentives will create a very different landscape for how we look at food altogether.

20:30

Jasmine Bina:
So do you feel like right now there’re any brands that are helping us with this cognitive dissonance?

Jean-Louis:
Well, I mean, of course you have all the kind of Impossible Burger, Beyond Meat, all of these companies that are creating these new artificial meats. And it’s interesting, the terminology they’re using.

Jasmine Bina:
And artificial dairy too. There’s Perfect Day. There’s a million nut milks, and it’s not insignificant that both the meat lobby and the dairy lobbies have really pushed back legally on these brands being able to use words like milk or meat.

Jean-Louis:
It’s fascinating, but this is the direction we’re sort of headed in. And I think it just sort of underscores the cultural aspect of this, that like so much about meat. I mean, not to beat a dead horse, but it’s about identity, especially kind of this masculine male narrative-

21:21

Jasmine Bina:
Oh, 100%.

Jean-Louis:
… you’re a meat eater, and this defines you as a man.

Jasmine Bina:
Or a meat and potatoes kind of guy, for sure.

Jean-Louis:
And so, obviously you can see how the big goal right now is to create a good enough substitute that you can feel like you’re not compromising when you don’t eat meat. And this is really to address the most fundamental layer of just cognitive dissonance. I don’t want to sacrifice anything, but I know what I’m doing is wrong.

21:47

Jasmine Bina:
I think what these brands … first of all, I don’t think that there is a really good example of a brand that’s easing the cognitive dissonance, because I think the cognitive dissonance comes when the way you act is different than the way you see yourself, right? So there’s that kind of discomfort. And I think the fact is, a lot of people don’t want to look at the inhumane treatment of animals because they’re not ready to face the fact that they are part of that terrible system. That’s the first level of cognitive dissonance that needs to be traversed.

The other thing is the emotional side of things. So right now, Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat, all of these other dairy alternatives, the story they’re telling is that this is healthier for you. This is better for the planet. Here’s the problem with stories that always have to, first of all, there are better stories and I’ve talked about this a million times, saying your better is always a losing game because better is relative. But also you’re really just talking about features. You have to emotionally deconstruct your relationship with food in order to start eating what people call Frankenfoods.

22:45

I know Impossible and Beyond Meat have both gotten this huge rash of pushback recently about people saying that these foods are actually really over-processed, and a lot of times the nutritional profile is not better for you than regular meat. Or the fact that they are really not solving any problems when it comes to waste and resources in the supply chain. Part of that is because foods, alternative meats and dairies have been lumped in with environmentally responsible stories. So people are expecting that from all these brands now. And I think that these brands we’re failing to see that.

But something about food is emotional because when you start to put things on your body or in your body, the rules start to change. I think part of it has to come from this idea that food, there’s a sanctity around food. And let me explain this. There’s a great article in Vox that I’ve cited many times called, why natural food has become a secular stand-in for goodness and purity. And they spoke with a religious scholar at a university somewhere. And he was talking about the fact that why is there suddenly this use of natural, the word natural or pure or clean around foods? I eat clean or these are natural ingredients or pure ingredients.

24:05

And I think the point that he was making was that natural has become this kind of like secular stand-in for a generalized idea of goodness. And goodness, the idea of goodness, being good and being bad, that’s religious. That is the fundamental starting point for all religions. And we’ve started applying it to food because food has become our new religion. If food is a ritualistic, subconsciously religious experience, and it isn’t a lot of cultures, by the way. There are rules for what you can and cannot eat in Judaism, in Islam and in a number of different cultures that stem from religion.

How repositioning these new Frankenfoods in that context, and I think that’s where they’re missing like the emotional context around this. What was really interesting to me was the word organic never came up. And we actually saw this in some user research for one of our clients too. People are much more prone to say, I buy natural foods or I go shop at the farmer’s market rather than shopping for organic. And that’s crazy because organic is a much more functional descriptor of food that is clean and pure. That’s a label, which means that brand has gone through certain hurdles to get that organic certification. But people are not applying this religious veneer to the word organic. I think that’s very telling

25:20

Jean-Louis:
There’s an incredible amount of gravity about this culturally. What I’m kind of excited about is when we got over this first generation and we stopped telling these better stories and we start telling a different story, I can imagine a world where we have, let’s just call them meat alternatives that can be functional in a way. Like things that have, and engineered to have like tumor egg and omegas, and all these sort of functional ingredients that can start to explore what food can do.

One thing I’m very curious about in the context of sort of, not just the treatment of animals, but kind of the way we think and talk about diet is sort of blows my mind is that one of the most fundamental questions humans need to ask is what is a healthy diet, has actually still to a large extent, not fully been honest.

26:12

Jasmine Bina:
There’s no real science that can prove anything.

Jean-Louis:
I know, it’s mind-blowing and everyone for a long time thought it was a Mediterranean diet. And then it turned out that there was that study. That kind of proved that actually, it wasn’t quite as good as we thought. Some of the numbers may have been forged.

Jasmine Bina:
Honestly, in this space for every study, there is a study that proves that study wrong. So you can say that with the Mediterranean diet, you can say that with a vegetarian or a vegan diet, with a Western diet, everything.

Jean-Louis:
And there’s a lot of incentive right now to sort of muddy the waters and say, “Well, if don’t know, you might as well just keep doing what you’re doing.” And I think that’s what a lot of these lobbies are trying to get to.

26:47

Jasmine Bina:
Now, this makes me think of something interesting that I had never actually considered before. You need to apply a personal set of values on top of food, because when there’s no science to tell you what to do, you have to create a framework that will help you decide what to eat. And if it’s not going to come from science and facts, then it’s probably going to come from lifestyle, beliefs and value systems, or maybe even like some version of like a religious belief.

Jean-Louis:
I think where this is kind of showing as a thought experiment, is that the way we eat is probably going to go through a lot of transitions in the next 100 years. Not just kind of on the science and kind of what we eat, but how we eat it, our values around it. There’s going to be a lot of negotiation and kind of going back to the fact that food is also really powerful vehicle for identity. It’s going to be a whole renegotiation. I don’t know if we know where it’s going to end up. We just know that it’s going to be a very long and convoluted journey.

Jasmine Bina:
I write about food brands a lot because I feel like that’s one of the leading indicators of where people are. It’s also where people have the most resistance I think to change. Okay. So we can’t really talk about food and responsible eating without talking about environmentalism as well.

28:00

Jean-Louis:
I think this is something that gets very interesting is that you look at a lot of these companies, as their hallmark, they’re really defining themselves as environmentally responsible companies. And they kind of bring their supply chain to the forefront. And I think of a recent startup, I think it was called Naadam. They’re all about affordable cashmere sweaters. And their whole shtick is that they’re talking about the supply chain, how everyone is happy at every stage. It’s the people they work with, the materials-

Jasmine Bina:
How they treat the animals.

Jean-Louis:
-it’s clean. It’s good for the world. It’s good for the people. And you can’t underestimate that what this is doing is it’s educating their customers away from their competitors. Now, if you look at this at a macro level, if companies keep doing this, which there’s a very good reason to believe they will, consumers are going to start getting much more sophisticated. And if we start buying, being mindful of the supply chain and all the kind of greater consequences of these products, it’s going to create a very different landscape for brands. It’s you really have to support these beliefs with your actions, and it’s not enough to kind of sell localized benefits. They have to be put in a global context.

29:13

Jasmine Bina:
That’s a good point, but I think there’s actually a much bigger problem than that. And what comes to mind is what recently happened with Allbirds. So Allbirds, they’ve got that quintessential Silicon Valley shoe. I think the peak hype has probably passed us, but you could argue that we’re still like peak Allbirds right now. And people are buying like the romance of what it means to have like clothing and apparel like this. The thing about them is when you lead with features like they have like being a super comfortable shoe, it can create a lot of distraction from what the real brand is about.

And Allbirds actually has some really compelling social and environmental missions behind the brand that people aren’t so aware of that. And here’s where the problem comes in. So Amazon has created a complete rip off of their shoes, completely and I think at a much more competitive price point. And of course it’s going to be a huge blow to their top line. Now, I think it was either Mark Jacobs or Steve Madden that did the same thing Amazon did to Allbirds like a while back. Allbirds sued them. But Allbirds can’t Sue Amazon. That’s just dangerous territory and Amazon would sink them in legal costs.

30:26

So instead what they did was the CEO wrote an open letter to Amazon saying, “Hey, if you’re going to copy us, that’s great, but you should copy our supply chain too. You should copy all of our responsible practices. You should buy from the same manufacturer that we do for like,” I think it was like the, the material in the soles of their shoes, “So that the cost can come down for all of us and everybody can get access to great shoes that are actually really great for the environment is a really genius PR move.”

And it got a lot of traction, but it underscored a huge problem that Allbirds brand in that nobody really knew their social mission or their environmental commitments and their product is their brand, which is such a dangerous place to be in, because now that their product is not just theirs anymore, what’s left.

31:11

Jean-Louis:
I mean, if you look at the trajectory of all these things, the customer base, that’s getting more aware of everything is getting kind of buying in a great or wider context. You have to be careful because as this consumer constantly evolves, there’s a good chance and companies do this. They educate that customer beyond their own products even, to the point where they’re like, well, there’s a better alternative than even you, even though you educated me in getting that.

And so this is something … well, there’s two things here. One is that the consumer is constantly evolving. Education is now becoming a key part in so many brands. And two is that everything matters in a way that it didn’t before. Before it was just really consuming for what it meant to me, or this solves a problem, excellent. And you didn’t really care about anything else.

And I think what this speaks to is that when you buy a pair of jeans and it’s produced in India and it’s producing all this pollution and it’s making a lot of the rivers toxic. Or you buy produce from Chile and you’re supporting a lot of human rights abuses around water, this is now becoming an important piece of the products and the brands you buy. Maybe not so much now, but in the very foreseeable future, you have to play on a global level. And I think it’s going to really change the landscape of who wins and who doesn’t by acknowledging these things, because it’s hard to do that.

32:34

Jasmine Bina:
But I’m going to argue that all of these things being social responsible, having a great supply chain, solving problems, resource wise and economically and stuff like that. These are benefits right now, but they’re quickly turning into features. They’re quickly going to become something that is attainable for every other brand that wants to tell the same story. So you need to move beyond what this product is about and move to whatever the lifestyle or the ideal or the larger future vision of that brand is about.

Okay. There’s one more thing I want to bring up. Another 100 year experiment that I think about oftentimes in our work is having to do with mental health. What are we going to look back on in a 100 years when it comes to mental health and think like, damn, we were crazy. I believe that in a 100 years, we’re going to look back and think of how immoral it was that mental health was secondary to physical health. And more than that, the fact that it was denied to so many people, either through the system, which I think we’re all aware of or because of gendered stereotypes.

33:37

Jean-Louis:
This is a really good analogy I heard a while back, which is that if you went for a run in the ’40s, someone would ask you who you’re running from. The idea that you could go for a run for leisure and fitness was kind of an unfamiliar idea to a lot of people. And the same could be said today of mental health and therapy. You go to a therapist and say, Oh, is everything okay?

Jasmine Bina:
What’s wrong with you?

Jean-Louis:
Exactly. And it’s just our mindset is so far behind the way we think about physical health. Like the fact that we have to talk about it as the mental health conversation. Like it’s its own thing, and it’s just now emerging that we’re like, oh yeah, I never really thought about mental health before. It’s kind of remarkable.

34:19

Jasmine Bina:
But here’s why I think that this experiment is a really interesting one to run. It’s because I think we’re starting to see some major changes and here’s what I see. So mental health, just like you described has always been very, very siloed. It happens in a therapist office, or it happens with drugs, but that’s what mental health is. And I think now mental health is becoming a lot more diffuse and it’s coming by way of wellness and self-care, which I could talk about for hours, but I’m not going to do here.

But we’re moving to this new truth that in health, in general, everything is connected. So people are starting to think that health is hiding in the connections. For example, the gut brain connection, the brain body connection. The fact that we could be in toxic environments and not just physically, but like emotionally toxic environments. All the memes around toxic friendships and toxic people, health and spirituality. Health is so connected to so many other things. It’s about transcending, just the physical side of it.

What’s fascinating about that is, it reminds me of a real truth and brand strategy and it’s this. When the definition of something changes, the stigma changes. This is a big pillar of brand strategy. If you don’t want people to bring their baggage and biases to your door, meaning if you don’t want people to come with biases from another user experience to your product, then you need to change the door. You need to redefine what it is that people are doing.

35:48

And that’s happening in mental health. We’re not calling it the therapist’s office anymore, we’re calling it meditation or we’re calling it bath soaks. We’re calling it goop and moon juice. We’re calling it so many other things that when it has a different definition, you forget what you know about the space, because you’re thinking this is something different and you are open to a wholly new experience. If this is abstract, I’m going to give you an example, Noom, the weight-loss app Noom. Here in California, it’s advertised all over TV to us. I’ve checked it out. It’s amazing. It’s one of our case studies that we use in our speaking engagements and in our workshops for clients.

Noom is actually not a weight loss app. Once you dig into it, it is 100% a mental health app wrapped up in weight loss. They have redefined it so you come to it with a different set of expectations. You’re a much more open to having a very raw, emotional, personal experience. Like there are questions and UX moments and spark points and little delightful experiences within this app that force you to have a mental health conversation with yourself. And that’s how they’re approaching food and body image and it’s fascinating. I would really recommend that anybody that wants to see how a brand changes definition and changes the stigmas does it, it’s Noom. This is the experiment that I think will play … I think it’s playing out right now in our lives.

37:19

Jean-Louis:
I mean, it’s quite easy to imagine in 100 years just looking back and thinking like how primitive of us to not even consider mental health, kind of going back to the big picture again. One thing that I find very interesting is if you look at suicide rates, suicide is a huge issue. According to the crisis, it’s now that I think the 10th highest cause of death in this country. It’s three and a half times more common for men than women to commit suicide. And probably a big part of this is this kind of toxic masculinity. And that comes down to how we relate to one another.

And to your point, Jasmine, I think this is something where mental health is not a concrete problem, is sort of, is adjacent to all these other aspects, your diet, your relationships, even your work to a large extent is definitive of your mental health. And so this isn’t something you solve with kind of taking one pill. I think, it’s a much more abstract problem to solve than maybe physical health is. With physical health, there are a lot of roots and you can see kind of like cause and effect much more transparently.

And so this point about toxic masculinity and the suicide rate, one of the things that stands out to me, that’s kind of interesting is this value we have on isolation and space. There was this article I read a while ago, how everyone’s moving out of New York to have more space, so each of their kids can have a room for themselves. And it just kind of shocked me, like when did we place so much cultural value on being alone? And I wonder in 100 years we look back and quite possibly, hopefully I really hope that we see relationships very differently. That we have many more tools to relate and connect to one another. There isn’t this kind of binary and how we see masculinity, where you can’t be vulnerable. If you’re vulnerable, then it says something about you.

39:10

Jasmine Bina:
Now, let’s just say what it is. Like, there’s this huge unspoken dichotomy or maybe spoken where like you’re either a tough straight guy and if you’re anything different than that, then you’re gay. Like I don’t think I’m exaggerating and in fact people have written about this. It’s this really unnecessary cultural construct, here’s our race again, that just drives this hard line between being a man and being something else.

Jean-Louis:
And what’s interesting, I think we’re starting to see a lot of economic incentives where, like if you look at gaming for example, there was some report recently, 70% of gaming is now a social activity. It’s done with friends as a kind of communal experience, that’s a big change. And I think it sort of shows that we’re starting to get a lot of economic incentives around facilitating these new kinds of relationships.

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, I don’t know, gaming still has a lot of like toxic male stuff in it.

Jean-Louis:
For sure, but it’s just this one dynamic where we’re starting to use this medium as a way of socializing. And there’s a lot of questions because again, with social media. Social media in large part replaced part of our social discourse and it wasn’t healthy. It clearly wasn’t healthy, and it kind of remains to be seen how this sort of plays out. If this is actually the sign of something good, or if this is going to replace yet another kind of aspect of how we relate to one another and replace it with something that’s even worse.

40:35

Jasmine Bina:
I feel like culturally, this is so much more insidious. There was a great episode on the Hidden Brain podcast. I think it was a series of episodes, but they talked to social researchers about when, boys when they grow up are actually very emotional, very touchy and huggy, very close to their friends. And they talk about their friends the same way girls do. They love their friends and they giggled together and they were rough house.

And then around the age of like, I think somewhere between 11 and 14, they start to become very solitary. They don’t talk about those same things. They’re not physically intimate at all anymore, and they kind of become these islands and I think culturally conditioned within them. And I’m going to link to this in the show notes too. Like it was a fantastic podcast. People should listen to this.

And that’s where like the discussion of like, that’s when kids start saying like, oh, that’s gay. That’s when like those kinds of words start getting used and young boys who are so effusive, suddenly turn into these different animals and they are denied such basic fundamental human rights like being touched, being connective, being relational, being emotional. People are going to disagree with me, but come at me, it’s fine. But like, there are a lot of studies around this and it goes back to what we were saying that there’s a larger mental health discussion happening here and I think it covers the entire span of our lives, not just adulthood.

42:05

Jean-Louis:
Like it could really be, if we think about how much energy goes into wellness in the context of physical health, it could very well be not even in 100 years, and maybe even within a decade, a lot of that attention will be on our own mental well-being instead. Like that will be one of the primary drivers of new consumption.

Jasmine Bina:
Mental health is the new physical health.

Jean-Louis:
Yeah, definitely.

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. We covered a lot. I would recommend anybody who’s listening to this right now, you do your own thought experiments within your own work. You don’t have to push it out to 100 years, but even pushing out to five to 10 years is going to, I think reveal some interesting things for you about human behavior, the stories that people are willing to accept, how much people are willing to change. It’s all great stuff to work with. Great conversation. Thanks, we’re going to talk again soon.

Jean-Louis:
All right.

Interesting Links & More Reading

Categories
Podcast

3: Women, Beauty, Money and Motherhood

Influencer-led beauty veteran Ria Muljadi gets deep with us about the current role of a women’s brand, what it means to have a realization about yourself through a brand experience, the personal impact of reconsidering your national identity, and how burnout is the new cause.

Podcast Transcript

December 6, 2019

8 min read

Women, Beauty, Money

00:12

Jasmine Bina:
Welcome to the Unseen Unknown podcast. I’m Jasmine Bina. In today’s episode, I’m speaking with Ria Muljadi. Ria is a business strategist that comes from the finance side of things. She’s the current CFO of EM cosmetics, the current CFO of Dividend Capital, which is a crypto fund founded by perhaps one of the most influential influencers around Michelle Phan and she’s the former head of finance for Ipsy. I really wanted to talk to Ria because she has a unique perspective. On one hand, she was literally there from day one, building the modern influencer-led beauty industry that we know today. On the other hand, she kind of has an outsider perspective because she didn’t come at this from a branding role. We talked about a few things. Obviously we talked a lot about beauty and specifically, if beauty is moving on from this shallow two-dimensional idea of youth that we grew up with, what is the new beauty about?

We talked about what it means to create a woman’s brand or gender specific brands and we also talked about what it means to have a realization about yourself through a brand experience, something that I think we’re all aiming for as brand strategists. Ria also shares a really profound, personal story about being an American and then choosing to change that identity when she realized that the title of being an American wasn’t giving her the life that she imagined for herself or her family. You might have noticed by now that we start these episodes with business and we end someplace really personal. Ria was exceptionally generous on both ends of the spectrum and I think you’ll appreciate it.

Okay, So Ria, I’d like to start these conversations with a big question. The reason I wanted to have you in this conversation today is because beauty is fascinating for so many reasons. It’s one of the most purely branded spaces, but what’s really interesting is, I’m hard pressed to think of another space where you have women founders creating products for women. I think it’s really easy to find products in any other space that are founded by men for a woman consistently. It’s even harder to find a woman who create for men. That’s even harder, but that’s another conversation. If you look at the beauty space, do you see anybody who’s doing anything interesting right now? Are there any women who are doing something that’s kind of tectonically shifting the space?

02:43

Ria Muljadi:
Actually, I mean, not right now, not so much in beauty for me because my background is so financial. Actually, one company I’m very fascinated with is Ellevest and with Sally Krawcheck and how she’s trying to educate women about being financially independent and to know your money because money is power and to be very smart about it. I think it’s important. I don’t think that messaging has been communicated. Money, it seems like it’s a very man’s world and no one ever thinks women need to know much about it and be very smart about it. With my background, I mean, when I talk to my family or my friends, I always try to educate them. “This is what you need to do. You need to take care of yourself.” But yeah, I think that company is fascinating. I mean, it’s really good what they’re doing.

03:31

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. The thing about money that’s interesting to me is that, I feel like whenever you dig down, money is not about money, it’s about self-worth. If you respect yourself, you behave differently with your money than if you don’t or if you trust yourself, you behave differently with your money than you don’t. I feel like I’ve lived that experience as I’ve grown up and gotten more mature. I don’t know if this is correct, but I feel like I remember that there was some criticism around Ellevest and this idea that it’s specifically for women. This is as something that happens with female narratives all the time.

Is it right to create something that’s just for women kind of? Some people feel like it infantilizes things like, you’re creating training wheels for women or you’re… Is it really about inclusivity if you’re leaving half of the population out? I think they got some flack for that. I know there was another car company too, that Pro Commercials, maybe a couple of years ago, that were about letting you come in to buy a used car, but it was for a female experience and it was less pressured and more transparent and things like that. It bothered people, both men and women alike. What do you think about that when it comes to Ellevest or any company that’s trying to create something that’s specifically for a woman?

04:44

Ria Muljadi:
I think it’s true that it make it seems like, “Oh, are you saying that woman’s not smart enough and they need more handholding?” I don’t see it that way. I just see it, because the messaging hasn’t been there, so it’s almost like you don’t know. You don’t know what you don’t know. It’s almost just like as simple as the criticism of, “Oh, if you’re buying a latte, don’t buy that latte. You need to save all of this money.” There are priorities and it’s okay to take care of yourself. You not have to be shamed for doing things for yourself. I think this company, it’s important to have that messaging and I don’t think companies run by men would actually care about these things.

I don’t think the point is too handholding because they think women are dumb, but I think it is a fact that a woman needs to be more educated because the messaging hasn’t been there. Yeah, they need to know whether you’re a housewife, whatever your profession, you’re teachers, that you do need to take care of yourself. It is important. I think this messaging hasn’t been around, so it’s good to keep repeating it. There’s a lot of questions like, “Oh, do I need to share a joint account? What would happen if my husband did this?”


They talk about uncomfortable situation like, “Oh, what would happen if we got a divorce?” And things like that. People don’t want to talk about it. It’s almost like, before it’s taboo. You don’t talk about this. Love is forever. Marriage is forever, but it’s true. It’s life. Life happens. You have kids. You have to think about that. What do you do if you don’t plan and you just think everything’s going to be perfect? Then that’s not good. You need to protect yourself.

06:28

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. So I think you bring up something interesting that I’m seeing a lot in the space around wealth management, so companies like Wealth Friends or Wealthsimple. A lot of people in that space are really leaning into the discomfort around money. Not that it’s a gender conversation, it’s very universal, I think, across the entire population and they’re dealing with all uncomfortable emotions. I think that’s a really interesting place to build a brand. Money has always been so utilitarian when it comes to branding. “We have the best APR or APY. We can give you the most options when it comes to you getting something financed or whatever. I mean, we can help you save money and we’ve kind of. I remember, Digit we help you save money by siphoning it off of your account, so you don’t even miss it when it’s gone.”

I think the space has kind of woken up and realized that the real problem isn’t how to save money. It’s the emotional reasons for why we don’t save money. I think that’s what you’re speaking to. The other thing that’s interesting here is, I feel like, and I’m guilty of this too, it’s easy to criticize these kind of early messages that feel like we had talked about, hand-holding too much or underestimating what a woman is capable of. The fact is, you need to honor them because these are the necessary stepping stones. Right?

I had somebody that I was speaking with last week on our last podcast and the term girl boss kind of felt uncomfortable for her. The fact is, just like you said, nobody was having these conversations and you can’t go from zero to 100. You need to have these halfway points, these stepping stones, so that we can reach in your consciousness, get comfortable here, make this our new baseline and then move up to the next thing. I think we’re seeing that in a lot of interesting spaces where there are kind of a lot of emotional triggers at work, especially as more and more women become founders that weren’t really addressed before. I think finance is totally 100% that.

08:27

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. I think it’s easy to assume that, “Oh yeah. I mean, a woman should have known that. It’s as simple as 401k or IRA. How could you not know about that if you’ve been working for a while? The truth is, a lot of professionals don’t know about it. When I was at Ipsy and I also take care of HR and benefits, and I work with 100s of employees repeating myself, what it means, what you need to do and these are people with graduate degree and they’re not dumb. They’re well educated, but that doesn’t mean they know these things, how the system works and how they need to take care of themselves. I think it’s important to have it out there.

09:14

Jasmine Bina:
I’m going to ask you something. I’m going to challenge you a little bit. Do you think that it’s not that they don’t know, because I feel like the information is out there? At some point we’re taught these things, but that, when we turn away from important information, oftentimes, it’s because we’re scared of something or we believe something about ourselves. I never really embraced math, even though I actually really enjoy it, but I always grew up with a story that I wasn’t good at it. I don’t even know where that story came from, but the stories affect our behaviors around these things. Did you ever get the sense that that was part of what was at play in your experience?

09:45

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah, sometimes, I think the information is too complicated that they’d rather just ignore it even competently. But when insurance company come and talk about their plans or whatever, it gets so complicated and people just go like, “Huh. I don’t know what to do. Just tell me what to do.” They just give up. They don’t want to do the research, whatever. I think it’s important to keep this messaging because people, they grow up. Right? First, maybe when you’re single, you don’t care so much about it. Then you are married, you have kids. I think, again, this messages are very important because, yeah, you do have to pay attention to it and it will matter to your life as you go through these different stages of life.

I think making sure the messaging is simple enough for people to absorb and that’s not intimidating, it’s important because sometimes it’s like, “What?” Especially in Silicon Valley, when you start talking about stock option, people are just like, “What? I don’t know. What do I do with my stock? What does that even mean? I agree to something and I don’t understand.” I mean, It’s true because I think that just the message is just too complicated and so you need a simple content.

10:51

Jasmine Bina:
There’s a way these people complicate it. You think it’s a matter of simplifying things in a matter, like overcoming any kind of biases or fears or anything like that.

10:59

Ria Muljadi:
I think part of it, maybe. There’s also a thought maybe if you believe, “I’m never good at money and sort of managing money.” It’s like, “I can never do this.” You know? I have had friends that say that out, guiding them, “You should do this and this.” They’re like, “I don’t know how to do that. I’m not good at it.” I’m like, “No, it’s not about being good. Just make good decision and plan for it.” It’s like you’re not inherently good at money. You need to learn. You need to figure it out and it’s actually very important.

11:25

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, being good at money is kind of just like, it’s a misnomer. It doesn’t even make sense. It’s not something you’re good at. Right. That’s interesting. I love it when, that’s language that like you deal with all the time. I say that, I hear it, but it never occurs to you just stop and look at it and be like, “This is literally nonsensical. You are not good at money. You can’t be bad at money. It’s just something that you decided to either deal or not deal with.”

11:54

Ria Muljadi:
Those biases definitely happen. I go to these meetings with a bunch of investment bankers. Right? Of course, 90% are men or I go to the founders and sit down with investors, mostly men, they would automatically talk to the men. They don’t talk to me, even though I’m the head of finance. I know more information about the business. I can spit out numbers and I know the data, but they don’t talk to me because of the biases. I feel it. I mean, I don’t know if it’s true, they’re just unconsciously doing it or It’s like, “She’s a woman or she’s young. She won’t know so much.” And they go to the older man next to him or next to her to talk about it. There are these biases that makes you feel like, “Do I know what I’m doing?”

There’s confirmation. Right? This messaging is like, I take care of the business. I run it day by day, but then, you see, you talk to people outside the business and they don’t even acknowledge it. It’s almost like you start questioning yourself. At Ipsy, I started quite young, and one of the youngest one, and I’m female, a minority, I’m not from Stanford, a lot of just the normal Silicon Valley head of finance. People are just like, they don’t get it. “What is this person doing here?”

13:21

Jasmine Bina:
That reminds me of something really fascinating that actually just happened with one of our clients recently. A lot of times, before you can even talk to somebody and I’m really pulling a metaphor from what you just described, it’s a thin thread, but it’s there. Before you can even like talk to an audience, you have to show them that you see them. You have to say like, “We see you, you belong here.” Then from there, you can talk about whatever it is that you’re trying to change their minds about. I see this in branding all the time. A lot of times people will talk at their users, but they never talk on their level. They never acknowledge that, let’s say you started taking online courses for something and your brand is an online course. “We see the sacrifice that you’ve made to be here. We see that you have other commitments. We see that it’s really scary to make this choice.”

You have to say those things a lot of times and acknowledge people so that they feel comfortable before you can even tell them, “This is what we believe education should be about. This is what we believe how you should approach the second phase of learning in your life.” I think that it applies on a brand level like macro, and then it also happens just in interpersonal relationships, like you described, like in that meeting.

You’ve probably already seen some of this happening in your space because you work with a huge influencer and you’ve been there since the beginning with her. You’ve seen how that space has changed, but that it’s also very much about, I think when influencers first came on the scene, it was exciting because people felt like they could see themselves in these people. The idea, the aspiration was starting to change. Right? It was very much like talking to a friend. There’s so much changing in this space. Influencers are dead. Long live influencers. I feel like we’re always post-influencer or pre-influencer. The new age is the influencer. What I’m more interested in is how the influencer is relating to the user. Have you seen anything in that relationship changing or taking an interesting turn recently?

15:21

Ria Muljadi:
Well, I think, like you said in the beginning, it’s definitely, it’s more raw. It’s more original. Right? It’s like talking to a best friend. I think people are just so tired watching all this ads on mainstream media and just people telling you, “This is what beautiful is supposed to look like.” Then you have this group of just regular people like your friends and putting makeup on and telling them their honest opinion and it’s just great. It feels fresh. Of course, then beauty brands know this and they’ve started capitalizing on it and started putting money into it. Then the relationship, I think, definitely changed because now it’s like, it’s not really your best friend because you start questioning. “Is there financial incentives behind it?” Sometimes watching social media is just ongoing ads. It just never stops. Right? In that way, it’s unfortunate because then, even though you see something in social media, I don’t think users who are smart would just believe it 100%.

They will probably look it up or read them, Makeup Top or Reddit or whatever it is, try to read it and see whether this person get paid or not, is this true? It’s not as honest and also because maybe there’s so many of them. The volume is just crazy. I can’t keep up. Before and the beginning, I know top five of influencers in YouTube and they’re the one that people watch all the time. Now, it’s like, I don’t know, hundreds of thousands, whatever it is.

Yeah. The unfortunate thing is that relationship that the trust is not as strong between the people who watch this influencers, but I think, in a way, I see it as also in a good way, is that the definition of beauty is expanding. We should see more representation in social media because before when you just see magazine, this one, it’s almost it’s templated it in a way now because there are so many type of influencers you see, even, I don’t know, all kinds of skin color, all kinds of race you see using these products. I think in a way people can relate more. It’s like, “Oh, she looks just like me and she likes the product.” Before it’s hard to find that.

17:42

Jasmine Bina:
Right. That kind of reminds me of something else that I feel like I’m starting to see that I think is kind of influencer 1.0, to influencer 2.0. That said, some influencers as they diversify like Chriselle Lim, for example, Michelle Phan, all the different new business lines that they’re moving into, you can’t go from being an influencer around one thing to suddenly having all these different forms of business without having a point of view. Michelle brings her point of view to what she does. Chriselle Lim brings her point of view to what she does. Then, you have people like Aimee Song who’s amazing and I think she makes herself very vulnerable, she’s very honest about her life experiences, but it’s hard to figure out what she stands for. You can’t stand for travel, and fashion and fun, the current things that you stand for.

If you want to stand for something and have a point of view, it has to be a bit divisive. Not everybody can agree with you. And I feel like some influencers get that and they’re really starting to have a voice around an opinion about something. Then there’s still people that are in the old paradigm that aren’t catching up. I’m starting to see that and feel it and I think that’s the first iteration of growing up that we’re seeing in this space. I’m wondering if you have a comment on that because you’re seeing it firsthand.

19:04

Ria Muljadi:
I mean, you definitely see different the types of influencers, and you see them maturing. You have, I think, a group that just wants to please everybody, so you avoid the hard topics or you don’t want to voice your opinion in one way or another, because if you do that, you might take out half of your fans. Yeah.

19:27

Jasmine Bina:
It happens. Who was it recently? I’m kind of trying to think of the influencer, but a friend of mine, Jessica Naziri, she runs TechSesh. She’s a tech influencer. When she started talking about her pregnancy and becoming a mother because she wanted to shift to parenting tech, she lost a significant number of followers, which is interesting because, I mean, she still talks about very generalized tech, and now she’s stood for something. I think the people that remains now really love her more because they want to see that perspective. They don’t need tech reviews anymore. They need to follow somebody that cares about something, so that they can participate in that experience. The other half shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

20:10

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. I think it’s question quantity versus quality. Right? You see even like, there are group of influencers that maybe the number of followers is a lot smaller, but the engagement is usually a lot higher. They respond, they answer, there are more interactions compared to maybe some influencers who have really huge following, but the instructions are not there. It’s just a number game. It’s like, what type of followers do you really want at the end of the day? I see it sometimes when evolution of whether that’s maturity and then you start figuring things out and you understanding what’s important and what matters. If you’ve been in the game for so long, the numbers won’t matter as much anymore. Then you start feel more comfortable voicing your opinion and in the beginning, maybe you’re a bit scared an obviously, there’s financial reasons for that. You have to be smart about it, but yeah.

21:07

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, totally. Okay. Speaking about point of views, I like beauty because it touches on so many emotional triggers and I feel like so many of them have been solved for, so coming to accept your body, coming to accept your diversity, being acne positive, body positive. I feel like almost everything in beauty has been solved for, but the one thing that baffles me is, how do you solve for aging? I feel brands, you hear things like, instead of talking about anti-aging, they’re talking about renewal, or regenerates or radiance. It’s like, they’re just code words for the same thing.

I haven’t had a chance to work on this problem for a client, but sometimes I wonder, “What’s the answer for aging?” Because for the aging crowd, you’re also kind of dealing with people in their 40s and 50s and I think they come from a different value system, oftentimes, not of their own making, but that they got culturally that, as a woman, your value is equated to your desirability. Can you imagine being desirable in old age? It’s hard to say where the social construct ends and the real human behavior begins. It’s hard to think of how you would change that bias or how you would make people feel that. That’s just one thing that I would love to work on that. That would be the solution of the century, if you could figure that out, I think.

22:31

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah, I think that’s a tough one because also, I grew up in Indonesia. I mean, in Asia, it’s about having clear skin and soft skin. It’s interesting and I never really thought about it, but actually my husband comes from Puerto Rico. I think, I was very surprised when I visited Puerto Rico. Their definition of beauty is very different and definition of body image and what we think of overweight or “I’m not desirable because of the way I look or whatever it is,” for them, it doesn’t matter. If they see beauty it’s like, in Puerto Rico, people are so relaxed and chill and you see people not minding their body shape. They’re still. Even my husband, he’s very expressive. I don’t know if it’s being Latin American. I never feel comfortable with that.

I don’t think my parents ever say, “I love you,” because it’s just, they don’t grow up with that, which is fine, but this expressing love, expressing care, why not? Not because of what you look like, it’s because of who you are. For me, I’m very self-conscious and I’m very uncomfortable with a lot of things, and you and me and everyone else. When I go visit there and people are just dancing or just, they wear whatever they want, whether that’s sexy or whatever it is. They just feel good about themselves and sometimes I’m like, “Oh wow, she’s brave she would do that.” They’re like, “Do that all here, all the time. It doesn’t matter.” It doesn’t matter if you wear a bikini from the definition of where I come from or where I live is overrated. I don’t care.” It’s like, you’re having fun on the beach. Who cares if you’re wrinkled, or old, or fat or skinny, whatever it is? It’s like you see all kinds of types and I just feel like, in that island, the idea of loving someone is not because of how they look. You love someone because who they are.

24:36

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. I would go as far as to say that I think beauty is probably entirely a social construct or at least beauty as we understand it. It’s so influenced by what we’re told beauty is as we’re growing up and it’s impossible to escape. I think at least the good news is, these things aren’t hard-coded like you describe. If it’s so wildly different in other cultures, that means you can’t change a story for this culture. It would be a gigantic lift. I’m not going to deny that, but it’s possible. I love the idea of looking at other cultures to see what’s possible because sometimes, unless you really do your research on brand strategy, it’s easy to assume that, “Oh, we can’t change people’s minds about this because this is just human nature.” There’s so little of human nature when it comes to spaces like this.

26:25

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. I think the world seems smaller and smaller now because of information flow and I think it’s good to be able to see what other parts of the world think about beauty and what they define as beauty. When I grew up in Indonesia, I thought beautiful means having white skin. That’s why when I went to US, I don’t understand why people want to get 10. I don’t get it. It’s like, “You already have a perfect white skin. What do you want to make it dark? In Asia, everybody wears umbrella under the sun. You don’t do that. It’s your skin. But then you realize, “Oh, they just have different definition of beauty.” I think now that it’s just going, for example, like Korean beauty stuff is going into the US market. Right? People are seeing all these K-pop bands or whatever it is, and maybe it’s not mainstream yet, but at least people start seeing, “Oh, in other countries, that’s what they think about beautiful and this is what this country…” I think just having that even conversation, I think it’s good to see what other places do.

26:26

Jasmine Bina:
I’m guessing also as a founding member of these beauty companies, you have been very involved in the research and product development too because you wear lots of hats like we all do. Do you look at trends in other countries when you guys were evaluating what you’re going to do with your own brands?

26:42

Ria Muljadi:
We definitely look at trends, but also you have to adjust it, not just the transport also environment. Definitely like climate, with beauty products, it’s really impacting just because it’s trending in Asia, but it’s really humid here. It probably won’t work here. You have to think about that. Definitely, I think looking at different region and different countries, trying to stay ahead, it’s important to see what could be brought into this country and they could match.

27:12

Jasmine Bina:
Where do you think the most interesting beauty developments are happening, products, branding, anything?

27:17

Ria Muljadi:

I think skincare is really growing rapidly. I think all the data that I’ve seen, that people more and more care about their skin. Color, obviously still dominates, but skincare there’s a huge increase, peoples are getting educated. I think this ties into, beauty is not just superficial, but actually deep inside your skin actually is good. You don’t have to cover so much if it’s already good, so you concentrate more on your skin. I think it’s interesting because in Asia, we’ve always concentrated in skin. That’s always been that way and now it’s such coming into the US and that’s why I think I see the big increase there.t,

27:57

Jasmine Bina:
The thing about skin is, I think it’s a convergence of a few different trends. Suddenly the word glow showed up everywhere. Right? It was this idea that beauty comes from the inside and it emanates out of you. It’s something that you put on your skin. I think that coincide with kind of the organic wellness, healthy living movement. Something else that I’ve seen that people have written about that’s so crazy fascinating to me is, if you go and see what’s in Sephora or what’s in stores right now, there’s all food ingredients. They talk about foods like watermelon masks, papaya enzymes, I think Kiehl’s has like a kin wah thing and one of the things. You see food everywhere. This isn’t an idea original to me, but what’s been described in this space is that, people have gone from wanting to treat their skin, to wanting to feed their skin. This belief that we should be feeding it. It’s this living thing, which it is.

That’s wildly changed our relationship to it because treating is about fixing something. Feeding is about keeping something alive, nourishing it. Treating is getting, I always use this metaphor, from negative one to zero, but feeding is getting from zero to positive one. That’s a wildly different beauty story. Right? It’s not that you’re fixing your imperfections. It’s that you’re bringing out a beauty that’s already inside of you, but you haven’t realized yet. I mean, anytime you can change a user’s relationship to themselves, anytime you can change the way that they see themselves or see themselves in the world, you can own that experience and that’s huge.

I think the early movers in that space totally got that. It’s kind of the way that we think about food now. We’re also in tune with our guts. We never had a relationship with our gut before, but now we do and it affects our behaviors. It literally affects the eating experience. You’re thinking about your vagus nerve. You’re thinking about your digestion. You’re thinking about chemicals in your body while you eat. That means eating is not what it used to be at all. It’s a totally different thing. The more that these spaces evolve, they just keep overlapping, beauty, wellness, food, stress management, parenting. They’re all turning into the same thing.

30:12

Ria Muljadi:
I feel like it started because, now, people talk more about well-being, about your mental well-being and people start realizing that, “Oh yeah, it matters.” Actually, I don’t even think about it until a few years ago, I worked so much. For me, the goal was career and financial security. That was the two things that I was striving for. How do you get there? You just work all the time. This is what you do. I work. I don’t even remember. I spent more time in the office and when I get home, I work again until I crash and crash. It feels weird when you crash, because then you just feel indifference. I don’t know how to describe it. You just feel so tired and then-

31:02

Jasmine Bina:
Numb.

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. You feel numb. I started reading Arianna Huffington book on thrive and it’s called Thrive. It was the first time. I actually think, “Oh, there is such thing like mental well-being. I have to take care of myself.”

Jasmine Bina:
How long ago is that?

Ria Muljadi:
I think after my son was born, so 2016.

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, so well into adulthood.

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah.

31:27

Jasmine Bina:
You realized that and you didn’t even look at yourself that way before.

31:30

Ria Muljadi:
No. No, because I’ve been wired to, you do well in school and then you work your butt off. In Silicon Valley the mentality is, you just work all the time. That’s what you do. You dedicate yourself, your life to it. I read her book and she said, “Oh, there’s a third metric of success.” I’m like, “What? It exists? I have to take care of myself. I don’t understand what that means.” I completely read her book probably in a day and I started thinking, “Oh, this is what burned out me. This is what I’m feeling. I think that there are more discussion about it and people start talking about it like, “No, it’s not normal to be stressful all the time. It’s not normal to work all the time. It’s not normal to take two weeks maternity leave.” I thought it was okay.

32:19

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, mine was just four, but two is crazy.

32:22

Ria Muljadi:
I thought it was okay. It’s not normal to work with your laptop in the NICU when your kid is sick. It’s like, things like that kind of just turn on like something in me. I’m like, “I have to stop this. I have to figure something out to take care of myself, to be better mom, to be a better person, to better wife.” I consider myself very well educated and I don’t even think about this because I don’t think the conversation was enough and nobody talked about it enough. Now that more and more people talk about it and that, yeah, it matters, it’s important and, now, I think all of these product comes with it. Right? It’s like meditation app or whatever it is.

33:03

Jasmine Bina:
The matrices, yeah.

Ria Muljadi:
You can take a breath. Everything that’s about beauty, taking care of yourself from the inside, then you feel good, you look good and then you don’t have to cover up so much. I think it’s all, when this conversation started, it’s almost like a floodgate that people felt it, but never knew what it is. Until somebody said it, it was like, “Oh yeah, I felt that. That’s how I felt.” Then everybody talks about it.

33:28

Jasmine Bina:
You heard one right message at the right time and it just changed the way you speak. You went from thinking that you were doing everything right to suddenly realizing that you weren’t doing things right at all.

33:39

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah, because I thought that was the best thing I can do for my family, to work all the time. Because giving them the security that they need, I have to do this and dedicate all my life to it. At some point, your body tells you as your body shuts down and it’s like, “Is that right?” I was literally to Excedrin every day for years, because I have migraines in the morning, because I barely slept and that’s how I go through today. I went through the day by taking pills just to make sure I keep on working. It’s so unhealthy and now I realize that, but before I was just like, “I work all the time.”

34:20

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. I wanted to have you here today, yes, to talk business, but I like to also talk to the RS people. There’s something about you from the dem at you that has fascinated me. I’m just going to give a high level overview on that. I want to hear you talk about it. I met you the day that you were leaving America and that was-

34:44

Ria Muljadi:
The last week.

34:45

Jasmine Bina:
The last week. Okay. That was last year. You told me that you had decided that this country wasn’t a good fit for you anymore for your family and so you were literally uprooting everybody and going overseas. I haven’t stopped thinking about that because you’re going to describe why in a second, which I think is extremely compelling, but I brought your story up at every dem dinner party. I kept wanting to ask people like, “Could you do this?” Because I asked myself over and over again, “Could I have done that? Could I have had the willpower to do that?”

I mean, we joke about, “If there’s a second term, we’re going to get up and leave. Where are we going to go?” I don’t know if we have the courage and the grit to start over someplace else, even though we’re very privileged and it wouldn’t be that hard. There was something about the integrity behind your decision. By the way, not everybody agreed with me. There were some people who felt like it was a cop out to leave the country like you had, which we’ll talk about. It just fascinated me and I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Please, I mean, I’ve talked too much. Tell me that process and why you did that.

35:57

Ria Muljadi:
I guess going back to my story before, then, I started realizing I have to take care of myself and my family. That should be number one. Two things that kind of triggers and it’s cumulation of several years, it didn’t just happen and on one month and we decided to just pack up and leave. First it’s the issue of safety in schools, especially. I have two kids, 11 year old and three-year-old. You hear the news, so shootings and things like that and you do get desensitized. It becomes so often that the shock factor is not there anymore and you’re just like, “Oh yeah, another one.” I was one of them. I was just, it’s almost better to just ignore the news than get stressed about it. Then one day my daughter came home and said, “Oh, we did a lockdown drill today.”

36:44

Then I don’t grow up here, so I have no idea what these are. I was like, “Is it like a fire drill or what does that mean? I don’t know what that means.” She explained what it was. She said, “Well, if somebody bad come to school, they will announce a code word and then the door has to be locked. We all hide in the closet, stay quiet. If we happen to be in the restroom, we have to lock the restroom and we stay on top of the toilet, close the door and stay quiet until they say it’s okay.” Then I was like, “Oh.” My heart was crushed. I heard them like, “Oh, you have to do that at school?” For me, it’s like, “Why?”

37:25

Jasmine Bina:
To simplify it, like an active shooter drill.

37:27

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. Like an active shooter drill. She goes, “Yeah.” And I was like, “Were you scared?” I’m like, “No, I’m fine.” She said, “We actually have done this several times. It wasn’t the first time.” I said, “Okay.” Then she said, “Well, but you know what the first and the worst part of it?” I said, “What? When they don’t tell you it’s a drill.” I know she must have this anxiety and I know that because she would say like, “Yeah, this kid, he’d stay quiet. He keeps talking.” I said, “If you do this and this was real, then next time you do it, we’re all going to be dead.” At the time she was nine, 10 and I just think a nine-year-old, a 10-year-old shouldn’t have thought about this. It’s too much. I was like, “I have to do something about it. I can’t have this anxiety.”

38:15

Ria Muljadi:
I left the US because, at the time, there was a huge riots in Indonesia and people were targeting people who looks Chinese, which is-

38:25

Jasmine Bina:
That’s why you came here?

38:26

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. That’s why my parents were like, “It’s time for you to go.” They stay in Indonesia, but it’s time for me to go. It was hard because my grandfather was a veteran. He fought for the independence of the country, but then now the country is hunting me down because of the way I look, because of race, et cetera, et cetera. It was really hard for my mom to send me when I was 16 and she’s very nationalistic. She said, “To this point, the country doesn’t want you, so you need to leave or it’s not safe for you.”

38:58

I laugh and I don’t want that for my kid, to feel anxious. It’s just not right, so that’s already started building. I’m like, “I need to do something about it. I just don’t know what it is. I want her to just be a child wherever it is.” That’s one. Then, secondly, my son was sick and he was in NICU for three weeks and we were fully insured, but we got the bill. We saw what the charges were before insurance coverage and it was $800,000 or something crazy like that. I remember at one point there was a 1 million cap and what happened if that still exists or it got put back in, that means the rest of his life. Is he not going to get insured? What’s going to happen because he does have health problems. What am I going to do with that?

39:44

Then the hospital transferred him from one hospital location to another one that’s just 15-minute ambulance ride. They billed me $9,000 because they said the ambulance was out of network. I said, “How would I have known that an ambulance with your hospital logo on it is out of network? You didn’t tell me.” It’s ridiculous, first of all, 15-minute ride for $9,000. I could have just taken him in my car and it would be the same. I actually had to fight for it and it’s out of principle. You’re really taking advantage of people at their lowest, lowest level, stress parents with sick kids, that you can’t make decision and you’re really trusting the institutions to do the right thing and they didn’t. For me, it’s wrong.

40:34

I even told my husband, if we have to pay, we can pay, but just out of principle, this is wrong. This is not right. I wrote this long letter of complaint and I said, “Yeah, I am unhappy and I don’t want to pay you. You shouldn’t be charging people this much.” And they wrote it off. They wrote it off. I think the only reason they wrote it off is because of my connection I have. I know somebody who happens to be a big donor to the hospital, but that’s because, you can say I’m privileged to do that. Right? But how about the rest of the people that are in the hospital? I just keep thinking about that because I was in the NICU with all of these parents. I thought about them and I literally say to them, “It’s paid for. Does that mean the hospital pay the ambulance company and where’s the money trail? I want to see the proof of payments. They’re like, “Oh no, there is no problem. We just wrote it off. Puf! It disappeared.”

41:26

Jasmine Bina:
It wasn’t a real cost to begin with.

41:28

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. It’s like, “I appreciate this, but I just want to tell you that this is wrong. You shouldn’t be doing this to people. You should write off everybody else’s because it doesn’t make sense.” Those were the two things, safety and health. I feel like these are the two basic needs that I should be able to provide my kids and they shouldn’t be worried about it. We started thinking about it. We started thinking of what ways and which countries and where should we take them, so.

41:55

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, in this part of the story you had mentioned to me, I think we had bonded here when we first met, because I mentioned that my husband is a Reddit News junkie and every day, I’m getting with this toxic download of everything that’s going wrong in the world. You mentioned your husband, but you invited him as a joke in the beginning to just like, “Okay, what are we going to do about it? Right?

42:13

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah, because you got anxious too when you started listening to this. I’m like, “You know what? Rather than complaining about it, let’s do something about it. What are we going to do about it?” Then he started this story, I mean like, “Okay, we want to do something about it?” “Yeah. Let’s do something about it. Let’s plan it out. Let’s start brainstorming. We’re unhappy. We are worried about the kids, their safety, their health, so let’s do something about it. Let’s do something concrete. It’s not just some dream or whatever, just do it.” It was that funny.

42:50

Jasmine Bina:
Mm-hmm (affirmative). I touched base with you after you had moved and I asked you how things were going and you related to me a really small, but very impactful story about being able to let go of your daughter’s hand when you were in public. Yeah. You don’t have to talk about it if you don’t want to, but if you want to expand on that, that’s a beautiful story that I think illustrates for people just how this is not about a move. It’s a very profound shift and just the way you’re going to live your life.

43:19

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. In here, I mean, well, we live in the US. Whenever we go in public, I was holding my daughter’s, my kids’ hands very tightly because you always hear child abduction and you look at clothes and your kids disappear and things like that. Right.? In public places, walking down the street and things like that, just never let them go. It’s probably the first thing that I teach them to do. “Always hold our hands every single time. Never let us go in public.” They’re trying to do that. After we move, obviously, it’s just out of instinct, they do that and my husband would be like, “It’s okay. You can let them go.” I said, “We’re in public. What will happen if something…?” He’s like, “Look around.” I look around and you see children running free, walking.

He’s like, “They’re fine. Look around you. These kids, they’re running around and they’re fine, so you can let them go.” I started not holding their hands and they’re fine and I can say, “Hey, get me a water bottle. Just go.” And they come back or “Give me ice cream.” They go and they come back. You start building that trust and everything’s okay. I think we’re fine. I walk down the street in the morning and you see a bunch of kids with no chaperones. They just go with that backpack and they go walk to school and these are eight-year-old kids and your kids, same at 3:00 PM when they come out of school, they’re riding their bikes and everything. It feels a lot different because I would never let my kids walk to school by herself in Santa Monica. I would never have done that.

I would drive her. I would drop her right in front of the gate, make sure she walk in, the gate is locked, et cetera, et cetera. But over there, I need to shift because I see they can be kids. They can be free and it’s okay.

45:13

Jasmine Bina:
That’s fascinating. I could talk to you about this forever, but I want to just express deep gratitude for being so sincere and honest about that story. I know it’s personal, but I know when I heard it the first time, I felt something inside of me change because I had never allowed myself to see a world different than the world that I knew I was raising my kids in today. I haven’t been able to shake the thought. I don’t know if I’m moving, but it made me look at my own life and my own circumstance as a parent living in Los Angeles, from a foreign perspective. I could really see things in a way that I hadn’t been able to see them before. I hope people listening to this have a similar experience with the story that you just told, so thank you for that. Thank you for a fantastic interview. It was fantastic talking to you about the beauty industry and your own experiences and hopefully we can have you on again soon.

46:09

Ria Muljadi:
Yeah. Thank you for having me.

Jasmine Bina:
Great.

(singing)

Categories
Podcast

2: Where Identity Meets New Behavior

We speak with luxury branding expert Ana Andjelic about the imagined communities that form around identity brands, the importance of hacking subculture over hacking growth, and the gendered stories that tap into our collective psyche.

Podcast Transcript

December 6th, 2019

8 min read

Where Identity Meets New Behavior

00:12

Jasmine Bina:
Welcome to the Unseen Unknown podcast. I’m Jasmine Bina, and in today’s episode, we’re speaking with Ana Andjelic. Ana is an amazing brand strategist. I’ve been following her writing and her work for quite a while now. She has an incredible career, and most recently, she’s been named to the Forbes CMO Next list, and she’s really just an incredible thinker in this space. 

I think this is a really interesting episode because we dive deep into a few hot topics. We start by talking about commerce first media brands, something that I think is top of mind for a lot of people who want to build something that works like a great DTC brand or works like a great community-built brand, but don’t quite understand the initial planning and things that needs to go into a company like that. We move on to talk about aspirational branding, something that is very personal to me. I do think aspirational branding is fool’s gold, and we’ll dig into that a little bit more. 

We talk about how hacking a subculture is probably a lot more important than hacking growth, something that Ana has written about a lot. Then we ended by talking about a different set of consumer narratives, specifically motherhood. That’s something that’s personal to both me and Ana, and we explore how it sits in the cultural psyche, how it’s been positioned for us as women and as a community, and what that means for how you navigate the world, both as people and as mothers, women, consumers, everything. I loved this talk, and I hope you guys get something out of it too. 

Okay so Ana, I was trying to think of how I would introduce you for this episode, and the thing is you’re so many things. I’m going to list the things that you are. You’re a strategist. You’ve had many incredible roles, but two of the big ones are, you’re the former chief brand officer for Rebecca Minkoff, you’re the former SVP and Global Strategy Director for Havas’ LuxHub, which sounds very interesting, I hope we get to talk about that. Now, you’re an executive brand consultant for companies like David Yurman and Mansur Gavriel, not to mention the fact that you’re a doctor of Sociology and you’re a ridiculously prolific writer who writes about all kinds of things, including brand strategy, retail, consumer behavior, marketplaces, everything. Did I miss anything? 

2:42

Ana Andjelic:
I don’t think you did. It’s like, I mean, I don’t know how anyone can actually listen to all of this and not be humbled. You know what I mean? I’m kind of like, “I wish she would stop.” But no, we really need to own everything we do, I think, and whatever accomplishments we achieve. 

Jasmine Bina:
Absolutely. 

Ana Andjelic:
So I’m going to own it. 

Jasmine Bina:
Own it. 

Ana Andjelic:
Thanks for the lovely introduction.

3:09

Jasmine Bina:
I think what’s fascinating about you, and what I really sensed when I first met you is, that you really straddle two extremes, you are very well-versed in the high level conceptual side of brand strategy, but also the extremely tactical side. And I think what’s interesting, and why I wanted to have this conversation with you today is, that most people are either on one side or the other of the spectrum. I know I lean on one side more than the other, and when you lean on one side, there’s a lot of room for BS. Because I think you need both ends to pin down what an actual viable brand strategy is, or any kind of strategy is for a company. And I think that’s what’s interesting about you.

I’m going to start with a big question here. There’s so much going on around brand strategy right now, people talking about the role that it plays in our lives, what it means. I think it vacillates between being something that’s really revered as an amazing superpower to be able to really think of a brand strategically, and then other times, it’s seen almost as the negative connotation to it, but there is talk that’s been going on for quite some time that you’ve also addressed about brands being the new religion. That’s such a loaded term, but I’m just going to ask you straight out to start this conversation, are brands the new religion? 

4:27

Ana Andjelic:
I did not say that actually. I think that the conversations are, the one that I wrote recently about, was more that there are no new sources of nationalism, but not nationalism in a… It was more like how do we bond with other people, how we identify with values and symbols, and what role brands play when now we don’t have the civil society institutions, and we don’t have the role that press, for example, had.

Jasmine Bina:
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

5:00

Ana Andjelic:
When I refer Benedict Anderson, who is a political scientist, and he described the imagined communities, his term is, for how he wanted to capture the rise of national consciousness in Europe in 18 and 19 centuries, and he attributed to the rise of press. Everyone was reading same things, everyone knew about same people and ideas, and what you identify with is how you’re different from everyone else. So there, the question is then, do brands now like Other Voices, for example, or Tracksmith or Rapha creating that bonding and identification, and the sense of belonging to a specific community, which is imagined because we don’t know those people. We just know that we like similar things, that we share the same values with them, so that was the idea. 

In terms of brands and religion, I love how confident you went after that. I really do, and I think that if that resonated with you, that you should certainly explore more, but I believe something has been more explored. I’ll tell you why, because there was a lot of writing and people commenting on how wellness is a new religion. Healthy eating, and then how our belonging to SoulCycle or other fitness classes or fitness group, Body by Simone or Tracy Anderson, that that actually replays the rituals and the communal aspect. We are going through transformative experiences with other people when we do SoulCycle. So that sort of that almost religious or spiritual transformation, it’s physical, but then when you look who SoulCycle trainers are, there is a lot of that element of spirituality there. 

So, I think that I was not talking about that because for me that was something that’s been already explored. I was thinking more about now that we don’t have mechanisms of social cohesion that we had in the past, which is a country club, which is, as I said, the press or the media, we are watching all the same channels, or we all hang out in the same neighborhoods or like whatever, there was something that kept society together. Now, all of a sudden, the brands seem to assume that role and for me, that’s not neutral territory.

7:26

Jasmine Bina:
Right. What are some examples? You mentioned Rapha and Outdoor Voices, is it the actual community building events that they have and it’s the in-store experiences or is it more than that? 

7:37

Ana Andjelic:
I think it goes beyond, because it’s first of all… Well, I think Outdoor Voices is a good example, so let’s stick to that one, if that’s fine with you. So when the people who are buying Outdoor Voices, they’re like, “Oh, I finally feel understood,” which is all good advertising mantra, like “Oh, we got you, we respond to your need. We recognize your need. We see you. We hear you.” So that like what the founders of Outdoor Voices figured is like, “Well, people just want to look good, they want to have fun. They don’t want to run until they throw up.” [inaudible 00:08:08] for Nike that you just want to move, do things, and look good when you’re doing that, not look like… I don’t know, like Silver Surfer or something. So I think that was the first. The product was something that a lot of people sort of identified as something they need in order to do XYZ. 

Then when you see Bandier ripped off the design, they were like, “Whoa.” because it’s such a big part of who their identity is as Outdoor Voices consumers. So think about that for a second, because you would just didn’t have that identification, you would be like, “Who cares? I’ll just buy from Bandier the same. Fine. It doesn’t really matter. I’ll just decide on price.” But here they’re not deciding on price. They’re not deciding on convenience or availability, they’ve deciding, “No, no, no. I belong to this imagined community of people who value the same things as I do. This is who I identify with, with this group of people who look like me or do think like me.” 

Then started the hashtag, the social object, which is a hashtag, which is still doing things. And it was like, “Oh, doing things is better than not doing things.” So it’s like, own it, have your life, live your life, be the boss, you know however it tapped into culture. So that’s a cultural moment of like doing. 

Yeah. so I think it is basically it’s more. I think there is just the entire brand building from saying, “Hey, how am I going to bind this community together? I’m going to use my products as symbols. I’m going to use the social hashtag as that the glue of social cohesion, because we all use the same hashtag when we are doing things that belong to this brand footprint in culture and in society. 

9:44

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. I think that’s really interesting because what we tend to forget is, I always talk about how brands should elicit a sense of transformation. You should be a different person after you’ve engaged with them, but what’s maybe even more important is, that you have this understanding that there are other people who you haven’t met, who are in this imagined community who have also experienced the same transformation and that’s why you would go to bat for a brand. That’s why when Bandier does something that infringes upon Outdoor Voices, you’re going to go and defend them online, which was actually a surprising outpouring. I remember when I first met you too, you were talking to me, I don’t know if it was that day or if it happened earlier, but that Outdoor Voices was having some sample seal and the line was around the block, and you never see that with brands anymore. Not even luxury brands. 

10:32

Ana Andjelic:
Totally. You’re so right, because I was going to meet you and I was walking and I’m like, “Wait, what? It goes around [inaudible 00:10:38]?” And I’m like, ” “Who are you wait?” I ask actually, because it was nondescript and there are Outdoor Voices. I’m like, “Wow, that’s rich.” Because like they’re waiting for athleisure brand? And then [crosstalk 00:10:47] like more staff started unpacking. That was a couple of years ago. That’s a good point. That’s good. I forgot about that.

10:55

Jasmine Bina:
Another brand that keeps coming up in conversations that I’m having with our clients, or even when I’m doing user interviews for some of our clients is Glossier, which I know is a hot topic brand right now. Not least of which the reasons being, because of their really, really high evaluation, but they’re a brand that I think has built a very strong imagined community. I don’t know where I saw it, but somebody had tweeted about the fact that if you look at brands that are DTC, they have like a certain multiple. If you look at marketplaces, they have a bit of a higher multiple. But if you look at commerce first media brands, brands like Glossier that started with media first and then monetized it around a product, there’re multiples are even higher. Is that a testament to where brands are going and where actual value is? Or do you think that’s just a trend right now that VCs are getting a little short-sighted by the hype? 

11:49

Ana Andjelic:
Well, I think it is definitely a lot, like the hype machine is really long with banks and like Goldman Sachs and with VCs and then with places like Fast Company that they’re hyping the new brand models, if you will, or those who are up and coming and so on. You see that with Farfetch, which was unique, when you see that with Vivax, IPO, so you’ll see that a lot. But they’re just saying, “All right, let’s all chill for a second, and let’s just find some more objective criteria. There’s just no rush.” 

I think that what Emily Weiss is doing really well is that how considered her growth is. So that’s something that she has going on for her. She doesn’t want to cut corners, she walks the walk because when you see the product lines she launched with, it was very one product and then add another one and then another one, and then create like dog toys. It’s very focused when it comes to product. She’s not everything to everyone.

Then if you go back one step and you said for those who are media, I think she just replaced one mean of social cohesion, which is content with another, which is product. I think that she benefits from being in the industry where everyone has an opinion. Everyone will tell you an advice on beauty. That’s like [inaudible 00:13:12] low denominator. If you talk about, I don’t know, like physics or something, not everyone is going to have an opinion, but when it comes to makeup or beauty or care, moisturizing, or nighttime mask, everyone is passionate about. Everyone has an idea. So that is easy to start that conversation because the barriers of participation are low and the sense of recognition is high if you will. You’re not going to say something stupid. Everyone is an influencer in that sense, because there’s obviously someone who’s like, “how do I get rid of acne?” Five people are going to have an answer. You know? So that’s something… Well, that’s true, there is the glue is very strong there. 

13:56

Jasmine Bina:
I see. That’s very interesting. I was just talking to somebody about this recently about, I think it was Flex. It was either Flex or [inaudible 00:14:02]. They were looking at maybe launching a community in a private Facebook group, and they point to the fact that, I think it was Flex had done really, really well there. And I thought the fact that, yes, but women want to talk about this. There’s no place to talk about this and it affects us every month. It’s very top of mind and it touches on so many other issues like fertility, endometriosis all kinds of things that aren’t necessarily taboo, but people have opinions and there’s a bit of a glue there. And I would argue that that community would have done well, no matter where it was planted. It wasn’t necessarily the channel, but it’s interesting the way you described it.

14:38

Jasmine Bina:
I want to ask you, what did you think of Glossier play? 

Ana Andjelic:
What do you mean? 

14:42

Jasmine Bina:
Well, you talked about how her product launches are very deliberate and that came out to a lot of fanfare. I was very excited about it. They teased it really well, but it did seem like an extension of what they already had, but into maybe a more colorful, playful territory of a different makeup. Do you think like that was on brand for them? Like what do you think they were trying to do with the trajectory of the company with that launch? 

15:07

Ana Andjelic:
I mean, again, I’ll go back to that. I don’t think it matters. I think she has a very strong base. She is clearly profitable. A lot of brands look at it like BFF chatty tone of voice so it’s easy to have it at a very, very low price point. But that’s good because the price points are very accessible, so everyone can participate and that’s an idea. 

You know what? The other thing that’s very smart is really like her customers do the advertising work for her. You know what I mean? Because they are basically talking about how they use products, what they can do. So I don’t think that it plays any different in that sense. Yes, sure you can have its iteration and that’s smart. You don’t need to invent new products and services all the time. You can iterate in what’s been working before. So I think in that sense, it’s on-brand and iteration of what she has already done.

15:58

Jasmine Bina:
The other thing too that I think is interesting, because everybody’s trying to figure out what the magic sauce is with this brand, is that they are talking about natural beauty at a very interesting time to be talking about natural beauty. They’re creating space for a conversation around what it means to have natural beauty for girls at a specific age where they’re negotiating what their femininity means. They’re trying to figure out how they’re going to present themselves in the world and I think she created a voice and a media and a product around that idea, that new definition of beauty, new or re-imagined or whatever you want to call it-

Ana Andjelic:
Got it. 

Jasmine Bina:
… that created a little bit of tension. It got people talking and interested in a different way. It was an alternative narrative that maybe didn’t exist the way that she brought it up. 

16:46

Ana Andjelic:
I agree with that a lot. Especially think about the demographics she is after, like millennials and younger millennials, Gen Z as well. So how they actually relate to each other, to brands and to themselves and how their identity is because when you look for example, Rihanna Fenty, Beauty, her entire thing is beauty for all and she has men wearing her foundation. So for them, that is really… and she sort of introduced the 50 plus collect. Started with 40 and that was sort of something that traditional beauty industry didn’t do. 

I think this BFF tone of voice that Emily Weiss introduced and how she allowed basically her customers to do the work of the brand, not in a negative sense, but in a positive sense in terms of, “All right. We know each other already. We exchanged content. We talked about different things for years on into the gloss blog and now I’m giving you this products. There’s a bunch of products. Go show me what you can build with that.” I don’t think that any beauty company they’re talking about to express yourself and blah, blah, blah, but then there is no place for that. There is no call to action beyond just the advertising tagline in a sense, “Oh, if I’m going to experiment, however, I want to make a foundation and I’m going to share to that. I’m going to get feedback that everyone has a little influence of feedback loop in their little own community. 

Jasmine Bina:
Right, right. 

18:18

Ana Andjelic:
Yeah. And one final thing, I think that it also coincided with the extreme rise of beauty tutorials on YouTube. So let’s not forget about the entire media ecosystem that allowed that to thrive. 

18:30

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, absolutely. That brings me to the next point. You wrote something once that just stopped me dead in my tracks that I think about all the time. You said that hacking is subculture is greater than hacking growth and you had talked about Harry’s and Dollar Shave Club. I don’t want to paraphrase for you. Can you describe that a little bit more? 

18:49

Ana Andjelic:
Yes. I think that the article you’re referring to the analysis is how hacking culture is more important than hacking growth in a sense that, what we think that most innovative products and services are actually results of the effect of social influence, which means they were not able to exist in a vacuum. The social processes gave rise to them and often they mistake disruption for social influence. So what that means in plain language is, that if society is ready to embrace a trend, anyone can start one. And I [inaudible 00:19:28] Dollar Shave Club and Harry’s as examples because they’re like, “Oh my God, there was so innovative companies. They disrupted the industry and made it as well be.”

The thing is that the report a year before those companies launched, was already capturing the changing grooming habits of men. So men’s behavior was already starting to change. The atmosphere was already starting to change. Japanese have a great expression [foreign language 00:19:56][inaudible] which says, read the room, read the atmosphere. That means what is unspoken, what is going on in the zeitgeist that no one really captured tangibly yet, but it’s in the air in a sense. 

So it was, I don’t know rebellion in fashion a few years ago, or that sort of changing notions of masculinity and changing notions what men’s grooming is. So when those companies came in, they piggybacked on that wider social trend of changing notions of masculinity. That’s why I say social influence is often mistaken for disruption because what you’re seeing that those companies capitalize on social influence, basically. Their message was met with the fertile soil for people to say, “Hey, we understand. This is for us.” So it was only the fertile soil, but if they tried to do that five years earlier, three years earlier, they wouldn’t have been as successful. 

20:53

Jasmine Bina:
I don’t know if people would read this and think it’s obvious, or if they think is profound. I think it’s profound because a lot of people miss this. They think disruption has to be in the product and they don’t understand how companies like Harry’s and Dollar Shave Club can be such huge successes. It’s because they don’t understand that really… I mean if I can paraphrase, they were reading a trend before it was apparent. Trend is isn’t the right word. They were reading a real fundamental shift in what people were willing to consume, how they were willing to relate to not just a product, but also their own masculinity and their own identities. They created a story around what that could mean. They gave people a pathway to realizing what that was. That’s not a small thing. I personally feel like that’s what’s really exciting about branding. 

There’s a similar parallel in technology. I don’t remember who said it. This is a fantastic conversation of not remembering who said what, but-

Ana Andjelic:
You can [inaudible 00:21:56] babies. At least you have two. What was my excuse?

22:00

Jasmine Bina:
I should take better notes. But yes, they’re… In technology there’s a similar thing where people… It’s widely believed that when a technology comes out, it changes our behaviors, but there’s a body of research that suggests that no, people are already starting to exhibit some of the behaviors that would make that technology adoptable. So the idea was that maybe there were signs that people were more and more willing to share, to tap into the wisdom of the group, things like that, that translate into these technologies where you share cars, you read reviews, you trust user reviews and peer reviews, and that it’s not the technology leading culture, it’s culture leading technology. I think it parallels to what you’re saying here, even in CPG and DTC. 

Ana Andjelic:
That’s exactly that, yeah.

22:45

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, 100%. So you mentioned Rihanna a second ago and I wanted to pause on her for a moment. Now, tell me why you think her brands are doing so well. I know a lot of it is because of her commitment to inclusivity, but is there more to it than that?

23:04

Ana Andjelic:
I think there’s a confluence. It’s the right time. So the time is really good, and I’ll tell you why. There is a confluence of a number of factors. For one, she is this strong entrepreneurial woman. So you can’t really take that. Even if she just stayed in music, that would still be something that is. 

Then when she goes and does Fenty Beauty and when she partners with LVMH and so that is some believability there. It’s not just celebrity because brands have partnered with celebrities for the longest time to move the needle of their business so that’s not really new. Also, it’s not new that celebrities launch their own brands. Look at the hip hop scene at the end of the 90s. With Jay Z Rocawear, with Sean John and so on. So I think that’s fine. She has that going on for her, but that’s something that it’s now anyone almost. With social media, any celebrity can be like, “Hey, I’m launching a fashion brand,” or something and many of them do. 

So for me, what was more notable is, how do you figure it out which celebrity brands are going to last longer than other celebrity brands. So it’s more like do you have some wider purpose or mission here? What is your role in culture? For Rihanna it was like that beauty for all, she has that inclusivity and she uses her own success story as a role model for a lot of people to see and get inspired by that. So she has that platform, but she’s more than just herself. What she represents is like what I said at the beginning when I started talking about this is, that she is strong female entrepreneur and now the time the culture supports. We root automatically for female entrepreneurs. We want them to succeed. We identify with them. So now there is that culture that’s like you go girl. So I think that’s really good. People are going to pay attention if a woman goes for it.

At the same time, she was one of the most innovative companies on Times list in 2017. That’s because she introduced 50 shades of foundation, which is something that crazy enough in 2017, no other beauty company has done. So a pair of celebrities underpinned product innovation. And even with her image, okay, her image may be like this or that, however, you want to call it, collaboration. But even there she’s like, “Well, you know what? I’m going to release when I feel like releasing. So I’m going to have this drop model. I’m going to have a website and I’m just going to check out and when it’s there, it’s there, when it’s not there, it’s not there. Forget about the fashion calendar, forget about the fashion system.” So even there, she’s doing her thing and that sort of innovation because there is no other LVMH brand that is doing it like that.

25:46

Jasmine Bina:
How would you compare someone like Rihanna to somebody like Kylie?

25:51

Ana Andjelic:
Well, for me, the thing is, I don’t really know. It may be me. I’m giving that possibility that I don’t know what Kylie stands for aside of being Kylie, aside of Kylie. So what is that wider purpose? What is the wider mission? Like Rihanna has beauty for all. What does Kylie have? I think that Kylie does have going on for her that girl boss female entrepreneur thing that we root for her, that she actually achieved something. But for me, she was on a billionaire’s list where Pat McGrath was a makeup artist launched her line. She also is a woman of color and is a female entrepreneur. And for some reason, Kylie got way more attention in media than Pat McGrath.

Jasmine Bina:
I see. 

26:32

Ana Andjelic:
So I don’t know what is the dynamic there, but Rihanna sort of went beyond that and say, “Hey, my idea is beauty for all and I’m really delivering on this promise through my unbelievably diverse foundation line. That is something that I’m going to keep innovating.” Also, Kylie, what is her innovation and her product? That’s what I don’t get. 

Jasmine Bina:
Well-

26:56

Ana Andjelic:
Is it innovative or is it one off? So for Kylie it’s a typical celebrity brand and just uses her celebrity to sell her product. Once people cancel Kylie, they cancel her business. It’s much harder to cancel Rihanna because her products are not about to Rihanna. Her products are about your, about all of us. 

27:18

Jasmine Bina:
You’ve hit on something so big. I think it also tracks with the way brands have evolved from 1.0 to 2.0. This idea of creating something aspirational is really… I feel like so many people try to build that with their brands and aspiration, I feel is fool’s gold at this point. It’s never going to take you in the longterm, but when you’re creating something that’s larger than one person, I don’t know if that’s lifestyle or something bigger than that, but like you said, Rihanna is so much bigger than just her name and you feel that. You feel the gravity of the message whenever you engage with the brand, whether it’s at the counter at Sephora, or through any of the content that she’s putting out, or even just seeing what she puts on Instagram. It’s something that, like you said, you can’t cancel it because it’s a larger idea that, by the way, also will evolve and grow and can be reinvented and redefined and change and live a much longer life than something that’s just attached to one aspiration one person’s specific image.

Ana Andjelic:
Absolutely. 

28:20

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, 100%. So while we’re on the topic, I feel like I hear people saying influencers are dead long, live the influencer. Where are we with influencers? What’s your take on that? 

28:32

Ana Andjelic:
Influencers are not dead. They’re alive and well, and they’re moving product like nobody’s business. So let’s keep that in mind because beauty brands, I mean biggest, let’s say that the fastest growing beauty brands, comparatively, are those created by influencers or propelled by them and so on. So I think that we are now seeing… It’s like with every industry that is maturing and then you have certain practices that are no longer very efficient at the end of the day. That’s the same thing when you had for luxury advertising, print, print, print. Conde Nast, he has like black cars for everyone, refinance your… Like unbelievable amount of salaries and so on because like, “Oh, you will advertise with Vogue.” You pay him, I don’t know, like millions of dollars and you know, money makes the world go round. So it’s like life is good. 

Then all of a sudden there is changing of how you commune in new generation of consumers, new technologies of communication. And all of a sudden it’s, “Oh no, no, no knocking on the door. Vogue is calling. No one wants to pick up the phone.” You know? So that’s what I find. It’s like that early influencers, they really capitalized on that newness of the new technology and the fact that people were like, “Oh my God, if no one is reading print and everyone is on Instagram or on social media, we are going to employ influencers as media actually.” 

The problem is, no one actually said we are using influencers as media. Everyone was like very muddled about what does that really mean? Does it drive product sales? Well, not necessarily because you basically bought a TV ad. So you don’t have any idea of which percent of your advertising is working because you’re just a wellness play. Like, let’s be honest. You’re not going to necessarily drive sales if you hire an influencer. You may get impressions. You may get rich, the same as mass media. So it’s always like how you pay influencers they’re very obscured and also, what do you expect from influences? What is the ROI? What are the KPIs? Again, very obscure, but it doesn’t have to be, because if you say we are going to pay influencers CPM the same way we are paying publishers or media companies when we place advertising there? 

So, I think it’s more around strategy around it and more about business rigor than the actual, do influencers work, don’t work? They work sometimes, they don’t work other times and it depends on which area. Like Opera can do anything, but you’re not going to go Kylie for a book recommendation. You know what I mean?

30:57

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. I think it’s just like what you said. We’re moving from aspiration to something bigger and the influencers that are diversifying their portfolios in a way that shows that they believe in something larger than themselves, that’s interesting. I think Chriselle Lim is… I don’t know if she’s actually announced it yet, but she was talking about coworking space for parents. I think that’s what she was going to announce, which to me sounds very exciting because it shows that this is not just trying to have her lifestyle or to emulate who she is. It’s trying to explore what it means to be a different person in this world, a professional mother, a girl boss, like you were saying, which is apparently a-

Ana Andjelic:
I hate that name. I hate it. And I hate that-

Jasmine Bina:
Why? Why do people hate that? 

Ana Andjelic:
I don’t know.

Jasmine Bina:
Why? 

31:43

Ana Andjelic:
I think it don’t… because it’s kind of like… I mean why girl boss? First of all, why infantilizing that? Like if you infantilize it, then it’s what? It’s less threatening to guys? It can’t be like a woman? You know what I mean? It’s like the fearless girl and has to be a girl because it’s like girls are not as intimidating as grown women. I don’t know. So that’s one. 

Then second of all, it just became like this blanket thing? 

32:13

Jasmine Bina:
Well, yes. So I think that’s also its strengths. I don’t know the full origin of that phrase because the first time I heard it was Sophia Amoruso’s book, which was called Girlboss. So I’m guessing there’s a reason to it and I don’t know what it is, but terms like that, even though we come to derive them after a while, they did something. They did some heavy lifting at some point. Like they-

32:36

Ana Andjelic:
For sure. I think that’s again, that thing like they capture the moment when we all are willing to support more openly and we really champion those who are very entrepreneur like yourself, you’re the girl boss but I would not… I mean, you know for me, it would be hard for me. You’re so much more. I think you’re right. I’m going to take that back because I think you’re right. They do the heavy lifting and they actually the capture the moment in a very tangible form, as words, as labels, as symbol. So, yes. Absolutely. 

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, I think so too. 

Ana Andjelic:
You’re a badass girl boss. How about that?

Jasmine Bina:
I’ll take that. Okay. Thank you. 

Ana Andjelic:
You should. Yeah, we didn’t talk about your credentials. I’ll introduce you at the end. 

33:22

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. We’ll let you do that, but let’s talk about some more personal stuff. I do want to talk about you as a person. I feel like a lot of times when I’m listening to incredible people speak, I want to know them as people. I’ll let you do that however you want. I will say though I did notice that you were reading recently, Sheila Hetty’s book Motherhood, which I’m interested in reading as well, but I know it talks about some tough things around what motherhood is. I recently became a mother. Motherhood is top of mind for almost everybody in my sphere. I think also it’s while we’re talking about girl bosses, while we’re talking about female entrepreneurs, this idea of being a woman who can also be a mother. 

I’ll tell you personally, you see the challenge for me, when I was pregnant with my twins, I saw the challenge as exciting. I was going to still stay the badass girl boss that I was, and I was going to raise these twins and I wasn’t going to slow down. I was going to prove that… I know lean-in has kind of become a dirty phrase at this point, but I was going to find a way to make it all work. I just didn’t want to believe that I would have to compromise.

Then the kids came and you realize that you still want all those things, but it becomes really, really complicated because there’s a lot of emotional stuff behind the scenes that happens in terms of, you have to figure out what a mother you want to be. You meet your children for the first time. They’re their own people. You don’t know who they’re going to be before they come. You realize that your relationship grows in interesting ways and exciting ways, but in also ways that you want to protect over time. And you’re constantly moving between, who am I as a woman and who am I as a mother? I’ve always felt it was important… I mean it sounds cliche. Yes. Everybody should be able to define motherhood the way that they want, but I feel like nobody tells the stories that are really important. One, motherhood, I don’t-

35:17

Ana Andjelic:
It’s a conspiracy. I think that’s a conspiracy of those who have kids to lure us who didn’t.

35:22

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, I don’t think it’s for everybody. Even if you’re a mother, that’s not… What I’m getting at is, even if you’re a mother, that’s not your whole being. I knew for me being only a mother wasn’t going to be fully satisfying and that’s a hard realization to come to because people will judge you for it. It’s hard to be a mother plus XYZ. That’s difficult. Anyways. 

35:48

Ana Andjelic:
So, I think what you just said is impressive and very eloquent and truly honest and amazing. I think it warrants a podcast of its own so think about it because I think that in a great number of cases, there is that lack of honesty. It’s not on purpose. It’s not intentional. It’s just that we are still conditioned to want certain things or feel like we are meant to feel or to follow a path that’s accepted and not… I mean it’s hard to self-explore and to question, and I’m on the other side of the same point that you were describing in terms of identity. Because for me, it’s like, am I missing out on certain parts of my identity if I’m don’t ever decide to be a mother? Am I closing the door? Am I not opening the door that is maybe great, that I never knew that I had in me? 

Am I a poorer person for not having kids? Or at the same time is, but do I feel that I need to have kids because everyone else is having them and that’s an expectation? I never paid much attention to what people think. I’ve been blessed with just not caring, but this is one of the things that is like on my individual identity level I am asking myself.

Then on also how we internalize society. I’m saying, “Well, am I being… ” Like the usual label is, if I don’t have kids, I’m going to be labeled as selfish. That is still very prevalent in this day and age, which is, we may be like surprised by it, but that’s am I going to be judged because I didn’t have kids? So that’s sort of like having a kid is almost like this ticket into belonging. Like doing things-

37:31

Jasmine Bina:
Oh yeah. Let me tell you. Yes. I felt like after I had the kids, there was this whole shadow world that I didn’t even see right in front of me. Suddenly, I was making new friends, meeting new people, being entered into new spaces that I just wasn’t allowed into before, because I wasn’t a parent. When you say that you were born without this gene or whatever that you don’t care about what other people think, that’s a gigantic fucking blessing. Because I felt when I was trying to make this decision for myself, I couldn’t even separate who I was from what the world told me I should be. I don’t think I even ever got there. I don’t think I ever got to a fully clearheaded space. All I know was that when I met the right person and I became more of a confident person myself, I stopped being afraid of it. That’s as far as I got.

Then other women, I think do really, really feel and I know these women who feel like it’s their calling and that’s a blessing too, but I don’t think it happens to most women, at least not in my experience. I think it takes a tremendous person to know… a tremendous woman let’s say, to really, really hear their authentic voice when it comes to motherhood because it’s tied to so many things. 

Like you talked about the selfish label. I felt an ugly label. I felt like if you don’t have children, it’s an indictment of your femininity, your value as like an actual female. Like you’re not a real woman if you don’t have children and-

39:04

Ana Andjelic:
Oh wow. I think… But you see, it’s also reflected through who we are, what we think, because I think that I am already a selfish person like just owning it. I think you see, for me, it was like, “Oh, they’re going to think like it’s ultimate selfish and that you care only about… You know, you don’t. And for you, however, that’s like retract that, how you feel about yourself, it was like, “Oh, I’m not fulfilling my potential,” or, “I’m not being fully a woman if I… ” You know? So maybe that’s your own sense of female identity, but you see how complex that is? 

And I think being able to honestly talk about it and not just be like, “Oh, I guess I have kids because if I wait, I won’t be able to have them,” that’s like the first I think decision-making process.

39:52

Jasmine Bina:
Yes, and that was the other big thing. I don’t want to mislead anyone but we heard plenty of stories of people who were afraid that they waited too long, but I was 37 when I had my children. It was only after I had them that I started to hear so many stories of women who waited quite long into their late 30s, early 40s, who were still able to have kids. I know that’s not necessarily the norm, but you’re always hearing… My husband calls it the survivorship bias. You’re always hearing the real extreme stories. You never hear the more moderate ones. 

I also feel like media is a little sexist because you always hear these negative stories in the media as well and it just feeds this constant fear machine that women have. Again, I really want to be respectful of people who have legitimate fears about things and I realized everybody’s experience is completely different. I get that, but I do not feel like enough experiences are being put out there for people to consume so that they can find themselves in other people’s experiences.

There’s one place though, and I just remembered it. So the New York Times’ conception series. Have you seen that? 

Ana Andjelic:
Mm-mm (negative). No.

40:55

Jasmine Bina:
It’s amazing. So it’s an animated series and it’s like two or three minutes shorts where women speak about their experiences with motherhood, non motherhood, abortion-

41:06

Ana Andjelic:
Well, I probably blocked it. No, I’m kidding. Mentally blocked it. Yeah, because for me it’s a conspiracy. Everyone who has kids conspire against those who don’t, you know what I mean? And they’re like, “Oh no, no, it’s amazing. It’s amazing. It’s just if you have kids, like unlock emotions.” And blah, then you do it, and you’re like, “Oh my God.” You know? I mean I don’t know, but like that’s why it was like so refreshing and how honest you were really and how complicated it is. 

41:35

Jasmine Bina:
It’s very, very complicated. Then of course, there’s the question of afterwards, like these two perfect little humans were born to me and you fall deeply in love, and then you’re suddenly have this new fear of how am I going to protect them in the world? All of a sudden, you’re trying to negotiate a career at the same time. Like all that is happening at the same time.

41:54

Ana Andjelic:
There is that also like indoctrination that is like, “Oh, you can do it all.” Well, maybe not, you know? And maybe not everything perfectly. I think that’s very detrimental that you think that you can do it all. And also why? Okay, fine. If you have financial reasons and so on, then you manage the situation, but just because you compare yourself to others and you think they do it all? Well, no one does it alone. 

Jasmine Bina:
Yes, oh that’s an excellent point. 

42:22

Ana Andjelic:
Yeah, and I think we need too more of that collective narrative of success. Who are those people who help you, who have your back, who prop you up? There is this credible narrative of success is individual achievement and that’s my problem with Cheryl Sandberg’s “Lean In”. It’s individual. It’s not a collective version of success. 

42:43

Jasmine Bina:
That’s such a good point. I feel like when I tell people about my experience, I have to tell them there are so many people helping me. And I’m so, so fortunate that I have so many people supporting our little family. That idea of the lone genius or the lone hero, it’s a very American thing. I don’t know if you see that too much outside of the U.S. I might be wrong, but if you look at all of our literature, if you look at the people that we turn into heroes, the stories that we tell about them, it is always the individual, for sure. 

43:16

Ana Andjelic:
Well, that is the… the American individualism is a very real trait so absolute that part of it is like lone inventor, the discoverer who goes into… Like the lone rider definitely is a big but I think, especially in this modern femininity, I think for so long, women are predicated, there is one seat at the table, there is competition, and I think I loved it. I’m seeing now more and more talking about like women helping each other, propping each other up, having a network. So, it’s sort of recognizing that you can’t achieve anything alone. 

And I think that is like there needs more of that feminine aspect to say, “Hey, it takes a village or it’s my entire community it’s not… ” but I think there is still undue pressure of women to do all of that, be successful in their job and be great mother and hold the family. It’s still a remnant of the past I would say.

44:11

Jasmine Bina:
Now that I’m thinking about it, I have definitely felt shame that I have needed help, which is ridiculous to think about it like that.

Ana Andjelic:
Totally.

44:20

Jasmine Bina:
… because why the hell wouldn’t I need help? And why shouldn’t I be looking for it wherever I can get it but I’ve definitely felt that and it’s very detrimental. Absolutely.

44:30

Ana Andjelic:
Yes, because not all of us need to be super women. It’s not about being a super woman at all. It’s about being smart and knowing how to emphasize your strengths and how to live a full life without killing yourself.

44:41

Jasmine Bina:
Yes, and that’s only half joking, the killing yourself part because you can get there so fast-

44:50

Ana Andjelic:
It really is. You have to ask yourself for who, for what? Who are you trying to do impress? Because it’s not even yourself. Like we would be more gentle to ourselves and you should mother yourself as much as you mother your two boys.

45:04

Jasmine Bina:
That’s very, very true. I don’t want to tie this back too much to branding, but I did want to ask you about women’s brands. We talked about Rihanna and Kylie and Outer Voices and all these women founded companies. And now we’re talking about motherhood and really femalehood, what it means to be a woman. What do you think is going on with major women’s brands? Do you feel like we’re having a true Renaissance? Do you feel like there’s something big on the horizon? What’s happening in the gender world when it comes to branding? 

45:34

Ana Andjelic:
What I think is, now everyone is on like a lookout. It’s like a high alert situation. Then across industries, it’s more advertising. Output is very aware of portrayal of women. The truth will be told, there is still too many men selling products to women and that’s very true across agencies and companies. And there is not still enough diversity. There is still not enough multiple voices overall. So let’s say that’s overall state of affairs. But I think that there is that like high alert, high sensitivity about representation. 

46:13

Jasmine Bina:
Right. I totally agree. It’s funny. I was looking for examples of men’s brands that were founded by women, purely men’s brands founded by a woman. I even put a core question up. Nobody could think of anything. 

46:29

Ana Andjelic:
But Prada is one of them.

Jasmine Bina:
But Prada is men’s and women’s.

Ana Andjelic:
True. So you wanted just men? 

46:36

Jasmine Bina:
Like some… Yeah, because there are plenty of men who have created products just for women. There’s… I think they’re called something in Alps or they’re a self-care brand for men that got big in Target recently. They, I know, are one of the few modern brands where it was, I think it was two female co-founders that founded it and created something for men. But it’s just absolutely not the norm. It goes in one direction, but not the other.

47:01

Ana Andjelic:
But I think we are still very early in that entire evolution and I think like 20 years, like next generation consumers are going to look back or advertising people are going to look back and think how primitive we were-

Jasmine Bina:
That is great. That’s great. 

Ana Andjelic:
… and how unenlightened, because right now, we are still at the stage of celebrating women being entrepreneurs. There’s that. And then we are celebrating human making things for other women. Like you’re just that. Oh, women are starting companies in fashion or in beauty or in, I don’t know, wellness. All is very like soft. 

Then I think the next step is, okay, the same way when the female CEOs of companies are there, you’re going to be like, “Okay, it doesn’t really matter if you’re a man or a woman, you can just go and if you’re passionate about making a cleanser for men or men skincare, or even if you’re passionate about providing like a software technology go for it. It doesn’t matter if you’re a man or a woman.” So I think right now, we’re still … because when you think about it, it’s like forever VCs wouldn’t get women funding. In the longest times, and then the VCs’ wives were like, “Oh yeah, you should fund because I would use that,” or blah. 

I mean, it’s not a blanket statement, but the point is, that first, it was very hard for women to get any funding, even the areas they were absolute experts on, maybe instinctively so. And let’s get first over that hurdle and then when a woman goes in and she’s an engineer and she wants to pitch a new, like a biosilk or there’s a spider silk, or a new biotechnology then that is going to be that. 

48:40

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. So we’re in the early stages then?

48:42

Ana Andjelic:
Very, and it’s a systemic challenge, but again, it’s good that we have words, as you said, like girl boss, and it’s good that the representation is changing and that we’re seeing more diverse ethnicities in advertising, because that’s also a challenge.

48:57

Jasmine Bina:
Yes. That’s a big conversation. Maybe you and I can have it next time. Who is allowed to tell which stories? Are you allowed to tell a story that isn’t your own? And I think a lot of people bristle at that, but it’s because they haven’t really paused to think about the question. Maybe you and I can talk about that next time.

49:16

Ana Andjelic:
Maybe next time. That’s a real… Like damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Because if you talk about your own culture and your culture happen to be male and white, then you are accused of not talking about other cultures. But when you talk about other cultures then you’re appropriating them and you’re disrespecting the depth of those cultures. So, yeah, again, let’s see how this plays out because we are seeing a great acceleration and I think there’s a great positive steps in direction of being more equal. Let’s first close the pay gap, please. 

Jasmine Bina:
I agree. Let’s tackle that one first. 

Ana Andjelic:
Yeah, yeah. 

49:59

Jasmine Bina:
Well, thank you. This was a fascinating conversation. I’m sorry that we have to wrap it up. Thank you for being so generous with your thinking and your insights and the self-reflection. It was really a delight talking to you. 

50:12

Ana Andjelic:
Likewise. Thank you for such amazing and thoughtful questions and a fantastic atmosphere that you created of honesty or of exchanging ideas. You know what? I’m going to do like few more female podcasts. This is so better than talking to men kind of like… I mean you are one of a kind like all of us are, of course unique, but I think that you’re really very special in both the way you think and what you achieved and how… You have your own company. You’re the CEO of your own company.

Jasmine Bina:
Mm-hmm (affirmative). 

50:55

Ana Andjelic:
And you have two kids and you were also very, kind of thoughtful writer because when you write, I read that stuff.

Jasmine Bina:
Good, I’m glad.

51:33

Ana Andjelic:
I mean we are bombarded with so many drifters and just like people. So it’s very hard to find someone who thought things through. That’s I think how we initially met, because I read something of yours and then I sent you a note. And honestly, I never do that. It’s just that the [inaudible 00:51:18] is very high. So I was impressed by how curious you are. You are wearing sort of many hats at the same time as well. So I don’t know how would I describe your ideas. How would you describe your… Give me like three words. How would you describe yourself? 

51:34

Jasmine Bina:
Ooh, okay. I would say definitely exploring. I feel like really, I always want to explore the frontier of whatever it is I’m studying. I try to be generous and I try to be reflective too. Those are the three words I would use. So not my titles, but the way I try to live my life, I guess. 

51:55

Ana Andjelic:
Well, it comes across very clearly. So you nailed that in terms of brand consistency. And I kind of mean for the greater things that you’re going to do.

Jasmine Bina:
Oh thank you.

Ana Andjelic:
And so thanks for allowing me to be part of your journey.

Jasmine Bina:
Oh, Ana, thank you so much. All right. Shall we talk again?

Ana Andjelic:
Absolutely. Thanks for having me. 

Jasmine Bina:
Of course.

Interesting Links & More Reading

Read all of Ana’s writing: http://www.andjelicaaa.com/

Read the article we discussed where Ana describes the value of hacking culture: https://medium.com/@andjelicaaa/hacking-culture-hacking-growth-a0cbf22917cf

Categories
Podcast

1: The New Rules of Brand Strategy

The coming wave of new consumerism, making users pay a premium for the story, and how to create brand strategy frameworks that consistently lead to defensible positioning. In this kickoff episode, Jasmine and Jean-Louis explore the edge cases of strategy in today’s marketplace, and the ideas and trends that are changing the branding landscape.

Podcast Transcript

December 6, 2019

8 min read

The New Rules of Brand Strategy

0:12

Jasmine Bina:
Welcome to the Unseen Unknown podcast. I’m Jasmine Bina. And this is my first episode with my partner, Jean Louis Rawlence. We are the founders of Concept Bureau. If you’ve come to this podcast, you’ve probably come to us through our writing or our videos, our content. We wanted to create this podcast however as a place to showcase conversations. A lot of times the content that we create is about how to do brand strategy or new thinking in the field or understanding why people behave the way they behave and how to leverage those understandings for your own brand strategy.

But we have some really interesting conversations with the people that are inside and outside of our sphere. And that’s what we want to capture with the Unseen Unknown. We’re going to bring in people who are experts in the brand strategy, domain, and people who are experts in other domains, and try to make sense of what we’re seeing in the world collectively. That’s what the name Unseen Unknown is about. It’s the belief that if you can’t see it, you can’t know it. And there are so many patterns and trends and frameworks and systems that are existing right now that are creating the machinery of this world, but we don’t understand them yet. And because we don’t understand them, we can’t really know how to use them for our purposes. 

We’re going to bring in interesting people every time, but you’re going to see a format where every month we launch two episodes. One episode will be with Jean Louis and I, where we try to talk about something thought provoking that gets you to look at the world a little differently after you listen to the episode. And then the second episode will be with an expert where we talk about things like user behavior, identities, cultural narratives, anything that’s new and happening in different spaces and verticals that could relate to our understanding of the world.

And for this first one, Jean Louis and I talk about the big questions, we talk about where are we in the state of brand strategy right now? How is the modern consumer evolving? What are the current frontiers in branding? And I mean, the not obvious stuff, what are those really what if edge cases? That’s what we wanted to explore. If you had to do thought experiments in this space, what would they look like? And so much of brand strategy is about creating frameworks, something that you’ll hear in this episode, I didn’t always believe in when I first started my career as a brand strategist, but now I’m a complete proponent of. But what makes a good, reliable, effective brand strategy framework that you can use to come to a solid answer every time? This one’s a bit more brand strategy specific, but we do expect the podcast to evolve over time. This was a great conversation, and I hope the first of many. Enjoy. Jean Louis.

03:10

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Mm-hmm (affirmative). 

03:12

Jasmine Bina:
I’ve been working with you at Concept Bureau for at least three years now.

03:16

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. 

03:17

Jasmine Bina:
You have completely changed the way we do everything when it comes to strategy. And so I think you can handle a big question to open this up

03:27

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Okay.

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. Where are we in the state of brand strategy right now?

03:33

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Okay. It’s an interesting question I think kind of like whether or not you appreciate what brand strategy is and kind of like how it operates. In some way or another, a lot of people are asking themselves this question. The way I see it is that if you kind of take a very macro view and you look at kind of like, you go all the way back before 1950 even, you can see that there’s a kind of a very linear progression going from features to benefits, to experience and really kind of behind all of that is this gradual moving up into what people are buying is stories and brand as opposed to the products. And there’s a lot of reasons for that. 

I think one of them is very simple. It’s just the mechanics of brand is that you used to have so few brands that when you bought something everyone knew what that represented about you. And it was very clear that you bought a Rolex and the features of that Rolex said something about you. Now, if you buy a modern DTC brand, if you don’t know that brand, then it doesn’t make a statement about you. And so really it’s not the features anymore that define what you buy, it’s the brand, it’s the stories around them. 

04:42

Jasmine Bina:
I tell this to people and either they, I think gloss over it, and think they really understand that. Or they just don’t believe that people have untethered themselves from buying actual products. I think in some spaces we’re still buying products, but those are spaces that haven’t really been disrupted yet. When you are buying something from Hims, when you get a membership to The Wing, when you buy Ritual vitamins, any of these things, you’re truly just buying a story.

05:18

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, I think one way to look at it that is maybe an effective lens is that when you think about there are just so many companies out there, how do you make that decision? This is kind of where the brand becomes important. The brand has become a proxy for how to figure out who to trust. And so in that view, yes, you may still be buying products at the end of the day, but it’s the brand that is letting you make that decision of who to buy. And I think that’s kind of the important distinction where it’s, they have a worldview instead of just a product view.

And so when you decide like, okay, I want to buy vitamins. There’s so many places to choose from and it’s overwhelming. So you have to find some kind of proxy and maybe you find it in the reviews, but the reviews always couched in some of the narrative. And so at the end of the day, your biases will always lean you towards something. And it’s the brands that you end up picking that will make that decision for you.

06:17

Jasmine Bina:
So truly you really believe that it’s the worldview that helps people make these decisions?

06:25

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. I think it’s … We see a lot of brands, especially CPG brands kind of move into content. What they’re really doing is they’re moving into culture, they’re having a cultural narrative and they’re starting to shape these things. And that’s the story, it’s the sort of who am I in this world. And that’s what brand is addressing. And I think that’s kind of one interesting point here especially in Western societies where you have the middle-class is pretty much one of the only demographics globally that is not seeing kind of an increase in wealth that everyone else is. If you’re at the very bottom of the economy, there’s a very good chance that actually things getting better at some rate, minimum wages broadly kind of creeping up slowly. 

There’s a lot of pressures to have more programs to support them, there’s that. If you’re the bottom end of society, things are going well, in the developed society. If you were at the extreme top end, we all know the stories about wealth inequality. And if you look at developing economies, you have the same kind of story. They’re actually doing much better, the rate of progress is really there. But in Western middle class, you have kind of a rate of decline instead.

07:41

Jasmine Bina:
So you’re saying around the world generally speaking, there is this overall growth, except for when you come to a place like America, and if you look at the middle class, we’re not seeing that. 

07:52

Jean Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. The relative income, income has been going up, but it’s not been going up to match inflation.

07:57

Jasmine Bina:
Is it just income or are you talking about happiness too?

08:00

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, I think everything sort of goes hand in hand. I mean, my view is kind of economics sort of defines the world we live in. And so happiness is to some extent a function of that. But if you look at the cost of goods and services, you look at just the overall, the macro economic picture. It’s not just kind of have incomes gone up, it’s are we working more or less? Is that money carrying us more? And the bottom line is everything has gotten more expensive, and relatively if you’re in the middle class, you’re earning less. 

08:27

Jasmine Bina:
And also would you say probably the sense of security has gone down too when it comes to finances?

08:32

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Oh, absolutely. I think there’s so many different things. And so kind of within that, there is some kind of search for meaning that is maybe more prevalent in this group of people in lieu of not having kind of the growth and prosperity that kind of does that for you. I think there’s definitely a cultural subtext there towards brands, and that’s maybe why, at least in my view that we look for brands that kind of insert meaning into things in a way that maybe we didn’t before. 

09:03

Jasmine Bina:
That’s interesting. It’s kind of dovetailing with something that I talk about a lot and finance is one of these things, but generally our cultural institutions have started to crumble and evaporate. I’ve said this many times in different ways, education, the institution of marriage, the career ladder, financial stability like you’re talking about. It’s your hypothesis that because we’re losing meaning in a lot of these things that used to hold meaning for us before we’re open to hearing a new world view or to purchasing meaning in some ways from brands. But we’re giving them permission to go into that space. 

09:41

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, no, totally. And I think another axes of that meaning is this, the notion of belonging. If you look at brands, it’s kind of interesting where we’re starting to see that the value of engagement in a lot of these brands is kind of more important than the value of awareness. They know that once they get a core community around them, that community will be so engaged that it’s kind of more economically viable to focus on keeping that engagement of the community rather than kind of drawing awareness. And the subtext of that is what they’re doing is they’re building tribes, and that’s kind of another source of meaning in our lives. And that’s a very fundamental evolutionary mechanism that addresses us. And it’s become really prevalent. 

If you look at a lot of these brands, it’s the communities that have created value for them. And a lot of M&A kind of reflects that, that it’s these organic tribes that drive much larger valuations for these companies. That’s the source of value there, it’s almost having the people. That’s why when they have cultural conversations, they’re able to show those values and actually connect with an audience. That’s why content works because you’re touching culture. And because you’re able to kind of create a worldview that people can kind of [crosstalk 00:10:57].

10:58

Jasmine Bina:
Let’s talk about that. Let’s talk about content. There’s content that touches culture and reflects culture. Then there’s content that sometimes if it’s done right can actually create culture.

11:08

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
I think we’re at a turning point right now. I think we’re kind of at a expansion point in branding where there are so many new ways. We know the mechanisms to reach people more and more is content. And the big part of that is because the cost per acquisition for ads is just getting increasingly expensive and increasingly competitive. And so the best way to do it is organic. So it’s actually a pretty good return on investment in the long term. 

But yeah, I think we’re still figuring out how to do this effectively. It’s kind of like when you look at partnerships with influencers or youtubers, we’re still … To some extent, some people have done a pretty good job of finding that balance of how to create an on-brand advertisement or connect that, but that’s definitely the minority and we’re still figuring that out. And I think this is definitely an expansion point where people are trying a lot of things, and over time we’re probably going to see a few of these things work quite well. The challenges is obviously, it’s one thing to kind of have someone say, “I like this brand, I trust this brand.” It’s another thing to kind of have a standard format for how to discuss culture. I think it will always be evolving to some extent in terms of the type of conversation and the tone and the way it’s told. But as a kind of primary channel for a lot of brands, I see that as being very fundamental moving forward.

12:29

Jasmine Bina:
I think that’s something that a lot of times when we speak with companies, it’s easy for them to miss. You can’t contribute to a culture or to a tribe if you’re not experimenting. You can create a six month or 12 month plan, but you’re not creating content that’s moving anything forward. The brands that push conversations forward are the ones that I think consistently will end up on top. I mean, provided that the product fits the market and everything like that. I think one that I’ve really been impressed with lately has been Mailchimp with all that, the whole new content studio that they’ve developed in house and the short form documentaries that they’re creating and that amazing podcast with Shirley Manson, and a lot of the multimedia content that they have.

If you really look at it, they are … you were asking yourself, why isn’t email management platform creating content that’s touching on such deep human emotional values? If you listen to these stories on the macro, you start to understand that they’re talking about entrepreneurship, and they’re saying that entrepreneurship and risking something is a very important part of the human experience. 

13:41

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
No, for sure. When you really think about what’s happening there, if you watch these things or listen to these podcasts and kind of really internalize that, you are using that as a vehicle to kind of define who you are as a person, that’s an incredibly intimate relationship you’re having with a brand that didn’t really exist to that extent before. Before the people would tell you what they do and how they are, and maybe they would go as far as to say, kind of tell you who you are for buying these products. But now it’s going kind of more and more internal into kind of this very intangible world of kind of worldview and values and kind of like who are you? Who am I to you? Those sorts of questions. That’s kind of a very big progression from where we used to be with brands. And I think a lot of people don’t appreciate the magnitude of that.

14:34

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. I think a lot of brands don’t appreciate the magnitude of effort and vulnerability that it takes to actually do that. And I know that from experience and that’s a huge takeaway if you’re not willing to take risks in order to just inch the conversation forward a little bit, then you’re really missing an opportunity. 

14:54

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, I think in some ways you can … If the function of these conversations in kind of defining culture in one way or another, whether you do it through content or not, is to create a tribe and create an identity around a worldview. If your worldview is something everyone can agree on, it’s not really a worldview that defines you, that can kind of specify that. And so to some extent if you’re not on the edge of something, you might as well not be having that conversation at all. If it’s not controversial, then it doesn’t matter if you identify with that to some extent.

15:27

Jasmine Bina:
Something related to this that I want to ask you about, that I want to make sure we cover in this podcast with you and future guests too, is we understand the market, we hope we do. We understand how the climate is changing. What about the consumer? How is the consumer themselves evolving?

15:45

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, I think it’s a really kind of interesting question. It kind of builds on what’s changing in brand strategy. It’s responding to how the consumer is changing. For sure the way I see it is through the lens of Maslow’s hierarchy, where for a long time products were about survival. Then for a long time kind of about belonging and acceptance and kind of moving up into esteem. For a very long time the pinnacle of a brand was providing esteem to you. And mostly that was in the form of luxury. You bought a Chanel bag and that was kind of … it was valued because it gave you esteem. And what’s interesting about esteem is really what’s the value that’s being provided is in everyone else’s view of you, or at least the perception of that. 

And I think where we’re moving now, which is very interesting and is markedly different is kind of, at the very top of the pyramid is self-actualization, it’s kind of who can you become? And the difference there, the important distinction is esteem that kind of, the permission is given by everyone else to you, and in self-actualization you’re giving it to yourself. 

16:54

Jasmine Bina:
You touch on something here that I think is hard to articulate sometimes, but I see it with luxury. Why are luxury brands struggling? And it’s because they’re failing to adapt the fact that we’re all moving up the pyramid, right?

17:08

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Jasmine Bina:
They’re still stuck in esteem. And it’s hard for these brands to really have a world view that can lead to some sort of self-actualization. When your entire heritage is about craftsmanship, and we’ve been around since 18 or whatever, and highest quality and artisans and things like that.

18:02

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
And so scarcity still exists, but it’s kind of evolving there. I think that’s the one place that we’re seeing some success. But for sure elsewhere, just the luxury market kind of falls apart because the values are like, if health is the new luxury, there’s no … scarcity is not a mechanism of that. 

18:20

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, I gave a talk on this at a graduate school in Paris. And I got a lot of pushback from students who did not like it when I discussed this very same thing. And I’m not saying that luxury is going to crash and burn, at least traditional luxury in the form that we know it today like the Chanels and Diors. But I do think that if they don’t start to evolve, there’s going to be a slow, painful death. I think they can coast for a while on what they have. Look at something like Gucci, they’ve gone from an interesting place where before they were all these other brands gatekeeper. It was about this same kind of scarcity, the same kind of authority, and being at that level of the hierarchy in Maslow’s triangle.

But now they are collaborating with all of these cultural keystone people, all these movers and shakers, and they’re expanding the brand so that’s malleable. You can actually literally play with the fabric of the brand. And they’re adopting the world views of these incredible collaborators that they’re working with, and that’s how they’re adapting. And I think that’s actually kind of profound and worth applauding. They’re evolving in the right way.

19:39

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, for sure. I think one kind of industry which is a good kind of microcosm of this is athleisure. If you look a lot of the kind of traditional incumbents that have gone into athleisure, it’s really an extension of the same story. There’s an aspirational lifestyle. And it’s generally kind of to some extent inaccessible costs so that there’s some scarcity there. And what’s kind of interesting is if you look at outdoor voices, which is coming at a very different angle, I think Tihany, the founder, said something along the lines of our real competitor is people’s image of their own body. Now that’s a completely different value system, that kind of coming at this. And you can see the breaking point here where you have the aspirational lifestyle is an extension of the model of esteem. It’s aspirational because of how it’s perceived, the value exists because of how everyone else is seeing it. And if you live that lifestyle, then they see you a certain way. 

Yeah, for sure. I think one kind of industry which is a good kind of microcosm of this is athleisure. If you look a lot of the kind of traditional incumbents that have gone into athleisure, it’s really an extension of the same story. There’s an aspirational lifestyle. And it’s generally kind of to some extent inaccessible costs so that there’s some scarcity there. And what’s kind of interesting is if you look at outdoor voices, which is coming at a very different angle, I think Tihany, the founder, said something along the lines of our real competitor is people’s image of their own body. Now that’s a completely different value system, that kind of coming at this. And you can see the breaking point here where you have the aspirational lifestyle is an extension of the model of esteem. It’s aspirational because of how it’s perceived, the value exists because of how everyone else is seeing it. And if you live that lifestyle, then they see you a certain way. 

And so back to our earlier point about content and worldview, that matters suddenly a lot more because if self-actualization is kind of discovering your potential, then education and kind of informing people of how to find that, and kind of those new values become very important to do that. And if this is a completely new behavior set that we’re emerging into, then we need tools to kind of enter that world. I think the second response to how the consumer is evolving is I have this thesis that we are kind of currently living at peak complexity. My kind of analogy for this is that if you look at how many decisions you make a day, right, and you kind of map this out over a hundred years before and a hundred years into the future. 

Right now technology so far has increased the number of decisions we make. We kind of have so much more information that we have to flood through. It’s not only like how do I get to work on time? What road do I take? What do I wear because of the weather? You’re also kind of like, what do I share on social media? Who do I share it with? What are the hashtags? Is this kind of on brand for me? What is the information I consume? There’s this kind of endless hosepipe of stuff being blasted at you. 

22:27

Jasmine Bina:
Can I make a little comment on the social media piece? I don’t know, like a month ago it was suggested to me that I just take a day off Instagram and I’m very active on Instagram. I love creating stories. It’s my one favorite creative outlet every day, crafting things from my feet. I really engage with my readers. I pose questions. I share my life. I talk about brand strategy a lot. But I took that day off. And I understand people talk about like, “Okay, get off social media so you’re not always comparing yourself.” Fine, that’s one thing that can lead to kind of like … it’s an emotional burden. 

But I didn’t realize how much creating content for Instagram was fricking exhausting. So many choices you have to make, so much creative thinking and deciding what to include, what not to include, how you’re going to tell the story. It’s actually a really complex process to create something valuable on Instagram that will only be watched 15 seconds at a time. And I felt like I got so much time back, but also my attention, because it fragments your attention so much. You’re paying attention to it throughout the day like every hour, it really just shreds apart your time. And it’s an invisible form of complexity that I think there’s so many different forms of invisible complexity in the world. And this is one that I think we’re all experiencing without realizing.

23:54

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Absolutely. There’s a huge kind of decision fatigue, which really is kind of draining your emotional energy and your ability to handle everything else. And you can look at news a similar way where you have so many headlines now are the word that I hate the most is slams. This person slams this person. It’s like, “No, they made a statement and they have a strong opinion.” Okay. That sensationalizing it to hijack our emotional energy because that gets attention. And that’s the kind of the unit economics of news. That’s how that industry operates is clicks, which is attention. 

And so yeah, I think more than ever there are more decisions that we have to make every day. We have climbed the mountain of peak complexity, but the reason why it’s the peak and not just kind of an ascension to an even higher summit is, I truly believe that now that the world is this complex, it’s created a lot of economic incentives to bring that complexity down. We are looking for things to tell us what to do, what to buy, how to operate, what to watch. We are looking for aggregators. And I think the easiest way to see this is if you look at the influencer market. We now use influencers to some extent as a proxy for a lot of opinion making and decision makers. 

25:14

Jasmine Bina:
Okay, let’s pause on this for a second. The huge consensus, the first half of the conversation that the world is having about influencers is that we aspire to be like them, that’s why we value their opinion. But you’re saying that there’s also something else going on that we’re not paying attention to, and that they’re actually making the world less complex for us. 

25:53

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Absolutely. And I truly believe that in 10, 20 years that you will probably be able to walk up to someone and say … and they may not see it this way in themselves, but you could ask them, “Who are the five, 10 people that you follow that define your opinions?” In one way or another they will have an answer to that. And there’ll be different buckets. There’ll be, who do you follow for political opinion, or who do you follow for fashion advice, or who do you follow for kind of like, how do you navigate your opinion around the climate change issue and these kinds of things. One way or another we’re starting to use these people as a proxy, because there’s just too much information to sift through.

26:11

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. And we’re really thirsting for it too. I think it was Chris Dixon, I follow his newsletter. I think he’s the one who said it, that the way he deals with that is that he just finds his trusted aggregators. And that was years ago, and before I think we even had a real consciousness around the word influencers, and that’s basically what he was saying, your trusted influencers.

26:36

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. If we were to paint a picture … Maybe this is a bit techno-optimist, but in 10 years there’s a good chance that with self-driving cars, one big bucket of decision-making is gone. When now with Alexa and a lot of these kinds of shopping AI is starting to get to a point where instead of kind of the onus being on you to sift through hundreds of products, they’re able to kind of be much more smart about their recommendation.

27:04

Jasmine Bina:
I’m not entirely sold on that. 

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, maybe not now, but I think we’re starting-

27:08

Jasmine Bina:
You know why I’m not sold on that? Because those voices don’t have a worldview. I would rather see what the founder of The Tot is recommending for laundry detergent for my kids than to ask Alexa what laundry detergent I should get for my kids. Because Alexa doesn’t share my interests, but the founder of The Tot absolutely shares my interest for sustainability, for safety, for all that stuff. 

27:28

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, I totally hear you. The way I see it is that in a sufficient amount of time, you’re going to start seeing those things automated and aggregated. I definitely believe that in 10, 20 years, it wouldn’t be surprising at all to see kind of a chat bot to kind of take who you follow and recommend shopping decisions based on what those people buy.

27:52

Jasmine Bina:
Oh God, that would be so amazing, because even going through the influencers recommendations, the influencers that I follow is a task.

28:03

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. Well, this is the thing. I think we’re starting to see that there’s so much value now in decreasing complexity for ourselves. And so we’re probably within a give or take 10 year window of what could very well be the most complex time in all of human existence, both past, present and future. And so when you look at that, then how is the modern consumer evolving to go back to your question? It’s definitely this complexity axes is defining a lot of decision-making and kind of the subtext of this point is that what you actually have is the platforms consolidating influence. 

Because if you look at Instagram or you look at Amazon with Alexa and you look at these different platforms, suddenly by using these proxies, you’re having your decision-making controlled by fewer and fewer stakeholders. And really to some extent on Instagram, you have to ask how much is Instagram as a platform facilitating this and kind of incentivizing certain kinds of behaviors versus the influences themselves. Because how visible the advertising is, how well they can kind of do product placement without it appearing as product placement, the line between having an opinion and endorsing something for a paid deal. Those are really under the control of Instagram to set the terms and the culture for that.

And so to some extent, what we don’t realize is we’re giving up a bit of decision-making power, actually quite a lot. And this is the problem, brand is kind of the carer, but a lot of these influence techniques and right now we have targeted ads, and people don’t appreciate how incredibly effective targeted ads are. You can not waste a cent on advertising to someone who’s outside of your target demo. It doesn’t mean everyone’s going to buy, but it means that the only eyeballs you’re touching are the ones that are absolutely primed, and it’s becoming far more sophisticated. And to think that it’ll stop here is kind of to not have studied history. 

30:15

Jasmine Bina:
And we all know, I mean, you and I have both experienced this, we’ll be talking about something. We could be talking in the middle of a damn forest, and we’ll mention socks, I don’t know, like Fruit of the Loom socks. And then once we get back to the city, we’re going to start seeing ads for Fruit of the Loom socks. We all know we’re not only being watched, but we’re being listened to.

30:40

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, 100%. And I think it’s one way, that’s kind of another way this plays out. It’s not only the kind of targeted ads and everything, there’s another mechanic. And I think it’s especially visible in sneaker culture where you have, if you look at what people are doing, you have Kanye West who wears a pair of sneakers that makes a statement and people talk about that because it’s culturally relevant, there’s something going on there, it draws attention. And then you have these people who are by no means influencers, have a small following. But what they’re trying to do by participating in the kind of the sneaker market and sneaker culture is play by the same rules as these influences that they follow, or these celebrities. They’re buying these sneakers to make the same kind of statement that let’s say Kanye West or whoever is making. 

Now they’re making the statement to a very small set of people who maybe will appreciate that, but they’re trying to play by the same rules. And I think we can’t underestimate how much this culture around influencers is kind of trickling down to the layperson, because to some extent it’s still very aspirational. I read about a study recently where so many people, just average consumers will buy clothes, wear them once for an Instagram picture and then return them. Influencers they get sent clothes, they do that, that’s part of their living.

32:03

Jasmine Bina:
I’m pretty shallow when it comes to Instagram, but even I have not done that. 

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
But this is-

Jasmine Bina:
Certain regular people are doing that.

32:10

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Regular people. It’s trickling down. These behaviors, people are trying to emulate. And I don’t think this is sustainable in any way. I think this is kind of maybe a fad, I read recently about, this is kind of … There’s so many lessons in history, you can learn if you just study it. And what’s kind of fascinating is most people don’t appreciate that after the printing press was invented, there was kind of a hundred year period of intense conflict around religion and all these things. Because some of the information was much more readily accessible. 

Now, most people have no idea that happened, but with social media, you have a radical change of social norms. The radical kind of increase in the availability of information in a very short period of time. And it shouldn’t be no surprise that we’re going through similar growth period where there is rapid change and not necessarily in a positive way. There’s arguably a lot of conflict. I mean, we don’t need to get into how there’s all these influence campaigns that are very subversive using social media. But just in the context of brand and how consumers are changing, this is absolutely kind of a critical moment where we’re redefining what norms are. And to some extent, a lot of these things might be very unsustainable. And so they’ll reach a breaking point and have to change.

But this kind of the economics and the lifestyle of influencers defining kind of the aspirations for brand and that trickling down to the lay consumer, that’s probably something that won’t, or can’t last. There’s so much friction and tension and pressure for consumers, and there’s definitely already starting to be a bit of a counter culture emerge around this. I don’t think anyone knows where that’s headed, but I think it’s kind of something to keep an eye on in the sense that this is a very dynamic playing field that is changing rapidly. And just there’s always this frustration where people see how everything has changed so much before us and assume that it won’t change as much in the future. 

And if history has taught us anything, it’s only going to change more. And so when we see how all these norms are changing, we’re not reaching a new plateau, we’re kind of exponentially accelerating. And with these new technologies that are, again, going back to that peak complexity point, becoming proxies for decision-making and consolidating that influence, that’s only going to accelerate. And so as far as how people are evolving, it’s that self actualization piece and put it in the context of incredibly dynamic environment that almost year to year you need to touch base on and also industry to industry. 

A lot of what we talked about is kind of relevant for fashion, but when it goes to workplace culture and how kind of business consumers are changing, it’s a completely new set of things. It’s also evolving at a rapid pace and it’s also arguably moving towards self-actualization, but the one kind of constant is that things are changing very aggressively.

35:09

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. As an example, what do you mean about what’s going on in business and workplace culture?

35:14

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, in that environment it’s very much about upskilling. Well, there’s a few components, one is kind of upskilling. Going back to our earlier point, people are looking for meaning.

35:24

Jasmine Bina:
Okay, just to be clear upskilling you mean taking a workforce, giving them new skills so that they’re basically upgraded or more sophisticated in their skills for the future of work? 

35:35

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. At least my take is, it’s not so much about the kind of economic potential. It’s more the meaning component. There’s a lot of studies out there right now that kind of show that people are willing to make pretty significant compromises in income and kind of where they live and living quality, because they want to pursue meaning, they want to pursue jobs that are more fulfilling even if they pay less.

36:02

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. You and I have seen this in our research a lot. We’ve worked with a lot of companies that are in the workspace or in the workspace space or in the skills space, it’s something having to do with people evolving their professions. And we see this a lot, work has become the new religion and not in the kind of funny tongue in cheek way where we’re worshiping our bosses and slaving away at our desks. But truly that where we used to find meaning in religious systems, we’re kind of looking for that same meaning in work systems now. And that’s why we’re willing to upskill ourselves to be lifelong learners and to jump ship so frequently between careers and jobs, sometimes taking a sideways step or a downward step, because it’s the meaning that we’re thirsting after.

36:52

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, 100%. And so it’s a similar kind of thing. If you look at that, it’s less about esteem and it’s more about self-actualization, kind of the value goes inwards and it goes like, how do you want to feel purpose? 

37:07

Jasmine Bina:
The thing about the self actualization is that business owners really need to keep in mind that this really destroys a lot of the systems and frameworks that they still take for granted. People still assume in the workplace example, I can see even founders that we’ve spoken to still assume that people are motivated by better jobs with better pay. And that’s just not true because we’re not … remind me again, what was underneath the self-actualization?

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Esteem.

37:41

Jasmine Bina:
Esteem. We’re not looking for esteem anymore. We’ve leapfrogged that. And when you’re looking for self-actualization, this career path of moving, getting better at your job, getting a promotion, getting a better job, more money, better promotion, go to a different company, better job, more money, better company. That’s not the path anymore because we’re not driven by esteem. And you cannot underestimate the fact that when we’re looking for self-actualization, so many of the old rules don’t apply. Okay. This is all really interesting stuff. I hope you didn’t already tell me the answer to this next question. I wanted to ask you, where are you seeing some exciting things? You’re a very much a futuristic person, you’re a futurist, you love to speculate about where the world is going. What are some of your really fringe ideas that can somehow be traced back to brand? 

38:37

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, I think one of the kind of more interesting areas is we spoke about tribalism and community, and this is starting to become such an important part of these brands, is really kind of, this is how you construct your identity. And so there are some brands that are doing really interesting work here, but we’re still very much kind of this Cambrian explosion of new formats of how to handle and run communities. And there’s so much more equity that’s sort of tapped into that, that we need to extract or brands need to kind of find a way to pull out. 

One example that you’ve written a lot about is the ordinary, and how there is this incredible amount of organic engagement where they don’t tell you how to use their products. And so the community has stepped in and done that for them. And people have spreadsheets on how to use all these different active ingredients, because they only sell the active ingredients, they don’t sell kind of these fully fledged things, you have to figure out what’s right for you. And the product is very much designed in a way that it forces kind of community engagement. That’s very, very interesting and quite unique to the skincare space. You’re starting to see that around, New York Times does a really good job with the Conception series and the Modern Love series. 

Jasmine Bina:
Which I love. I love both of those series. 

39:58

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. They’re giving a voice to this community or these communities to talk about the difficult parts of motherhood

40:06

Jasmine Bina:
Yes, that’s a good example of a brand taking risks. And this is risky stuff that they’re talking about, very, very debatable meaning of life stuff, and inching the conversation forward despite how deeply uncomfortable it is. 

40:22

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. But I think if you look at the mechanics of what’s happening there, The New York times is not telling you anything about what it’s like to be a parent in the modern era or what it’s like to have a modern relationship. They are giving that community a platform. And I think that’s the difference there, is that what’s so evocative, what’s so powerful about that is it’s not a gatekeeper telling you how to live. It’s them using that platform to really elevate that conversation. 

40:54

Jasmine Bina:
I would push back a little bit. They are still filtering the stories, get on there, and there are specific stories. 

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Well, okay, that’s fair, that’s definitely-

Jasmine Bina:
This are like stories from the Bible Belt, these are definitely like New Yorker, Southern California stories.

41:05

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Okay. You are right. There’s a lot of editorial discretion, but it’s just the difference compared to all the brands is the rules of gate keeping have changed here, I think that’s the point. And that they are kind of creating a community around this, something that you can identify with. And you’re absolutely right, it is a subset, it’s a small group of people that view it a certain way. That’s definitely interesting. 

One thing I think is almost not as exciting as it should be is DTC, or maybe that’s the wrong way to put it. It’s just the story of DTC is a very old story in my eyes, where you have someone coming in with a single product that wants to be best in market, [Casper 00:41:46], the very, very kind of the prototypical example of this, or even Warby Parker. They come in, they say the industry is stagnant. There’s all these problems. We have the new best product and they come in with one product and they try and win the market there and then expand horizontally from that. And we’ve seen this a lot. I think one of the problems is that people don’t appreciate the economics of this, is that it works really well in certain industries where there are gatekeepers where there’s a lot of stagnation.

Jasmine Bina:
And difficulty to change, a lot of vested interests and systems and things like that.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. It doesn’t mean it works for every industry.

42:19

Jasmine Bina:
Well, yeah, also a lot of the advantages of DTC have totally started to disappear, even old companies like Walmart are starting to act more like DTC companies, people are getting really smart to the game. I don’t know that there are too many more built in advantages to being a DTC company first anymore. 

42:42

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. I think for a lot of startups it’s the de facto cause, but it’s not what it used to mean for a lot of people, because a lot of the low-hanging fruit has been disrupted, but also if everyone’s DTC then it doesn’t have the same cache as it used to. Everyone is saying that we have something new and better and they’re trying to be best in class in these very narrow fields. And so it’s kind of, the mechanics have changed. And if you look at some of the kind of the winners in the DTC market and you look at where they’re going, they’re moving into content, just like everyone else, they’re becoming kind of building their tribe and kind of having those mechanics, and DTC is really just not a sort of disruptive format, it’s almost a de facto format.

43:27

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. And I think we went through an uncomfortable period over the last couple of years where people were still being seen as disruptive by virtue of the fact that they had taken something that was brick and mortar and made it DTC. But that model is not disruptive, that’s what they were missing. Warby Parker, Hims, all these other brands, they didn’t do well because of the DTC model, they did well because of something having to do with the product but more importantly with the brand.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah.

43:56

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. I’m going to push you a little bit further. I want more extreme edge cases. If we’re really looking at the current frontiers in branding, not the obvious stuff, but like I said before, those real edge cases. If you had to do a thought experiment about something really fascinating that maybe on the mid to long-term horizon, what pops into mind for you?

44:20

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
I think one thing, we know that brands can be really, really powerful, and really effective at kind of changing mindset and pushing the cultural conversation forwards. What I don’t think we’ve seen anywhere near enough of, that absolutely there’s so much opportunity for is brands that don’t focus on built around businesses. What I mean is, if you take climate action, there is so much equity there to build grassroots brands. A good example of this done right is the Me Too movement. There is a very dishonorable brand around that. There is a strong story. There’s a cultural narrative. They’ve done very well. 

But you don’t see a lot of Me Toos for other spaces or other issues, other causes that aren’t economically incentivized by a product and kind of trying to capture some value. And so it’s kind of interesting, it’s something we haven’t seen a lot of to create kind of grassroots brands, those grassroots action, and definitely kind of a lot of organizations that spin out of these things, but not really strong brands.

45:25

Jasmine Bina:
I suspect part of it is because people believe that a cause cannot be a brand. People believe that a cause should be enough, but causes are problematic. They inspire guilt, like climate change, equal rights, things around the family or children, they inspire guilt and that works in the short-term. You feel guilty for a short period of time. You pay to have your guilt absolved in the form of a donation, but you don’t want to be fricking constantly reminded of this thing that makes you feel guilty. And to their credit, the people behind these causes truly feel the need to make change happen. And they feel that their cause should lead. But I would encourage people to think that the causes may be a secondary message. 

46:18

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, now I definitely agree that to some extent if you can change culture, then that sort of trickles down to everything else. And so the power of brand, I just don’t think these people fully appreciate how effective brands can be at shifting the narrative and creating new norms. Absolutely I totally agree that there’s this way too much guilt in all of these different causes, and the organizations that have created narratives that don’t use guilt, they don’t have strong brands, they haven’t kind of built those vehicles. And I think part of it is that it’s a kind of a tangential investment, or at least it feels that way, that in order to change culture maybe that means that you have to be playing strongly in the content space. And that feels like a waste of money when you should be spending money on all these kinds of direct awareness things.

Jasmine Bina:
Exactly.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
But it’s really kind of the short-term versus the long-term.

47:12

Jasmine Bina:
And it’s missing the self-actualization piece, might give to Smartwater, I want to buy Smartwater or any of those other water brands that build a well someplace in an impoverished community. Where’s the self-actualization piece for me? That sounds so counterintuitive when it comes to cause-based issues, but that’s how you captivate people for better or for worse. 

47:35

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Now they need to tap into current values. If you look to Maslow’s hierarchy to use that as a kind of lens, they’re not even at esteem, they’re down in the survival safety kind of bracket, and it’s a completely different set of needs. And if they don’t start operating like a modern brand, and the thing is, there’s so much equity to do that. In a lot of ways they are trying to change culture. In a lot of ways they’re kind of pushing things forwards beyond what a lot of these brands are doing, they’re far more kind of high-minded and aspirational in the good sense of like, this is what the world can become.

Jasmine Bina:
The parallel here is they have a really good product. 

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yes. 

Jasmine Bina:
They have a really good product, but it’s not being branded correctly.

48:16

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. Definitely as far as kind of like the real front is, yeah, brands around non businesses, I think that’s something interesting. The other thing I kind of been keeping an eye on is political brands. Definitely we’re starting to see the kind of the individual brand really, really, really become effective in politics. And that’s something that is definitely going to keep evolving. One thing I’d love to see personally is we have this kind of demonization of people changing their opinions in politics, and it’s so counter-intuitive.

48:51

Jasmine Bina:
But what are you saying here? That we demonize people change their opinions? 

48:56

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Absolutely. And there are so many studies that back this up, that if you have a politician that you like and they change their stance on something, even if it’s to be more aligned with you, it’s seen as a sign of weakness and you’ll strategically maybe not vote with them because you think everyone else sees it as a weakness too. It’s really kind of, there’s a very toxic brand around the fact that as a politician, it’s dangerous to evolve, which doesn’t make any sense. If there was ever a field where you would want to kind of change your opinions and evolve and be seen as a dynamic figure, that would be the one.

49:29

Jasmine Bina:
Is this only in America?

49:32

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
I mean, I can’t speak for the world obviously, but I definitely think it’s something in the West.

49:36

Jasmine Bina:
Did you see it in the UK?

49:38

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
To some extent, definitely to some extent there’s definitely bias there. And I think it’s a very fundamental thing about how we kind of see people that’s kind of, we put integrity over everything else and that’s kind of the wrong horse to bet on. What I would love to see is to see someone build a political personal brand that accommodates that kind of personal evolution, that would be very, very interesting.

50:07

Jasmine Bina:
You’re saying a politician that creates a brand around the fact that they are constantly exploring, learning and evolving their opinions.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yes. 

Jasmine Bina:
Ooh. I feel like-

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
It’s a tall order. 

Jasmine Bina:
Okay, here’s the thing. I think people have a hard time letting politicians do this because they confuse changing your opinion with changing your values.
Okay, here’s the thing. I think people have a hard time letting politicians do this because they confuse changing your opinion with changing your values.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah.

50:29

Jasmine Bina:
And that’s what’s difficult for them, especially in a two party system. Andrew Yang kind of I think could be a little different here as a candidate. I think, I mean, I’ve watched him for a couple of years now and I’ve seen him speak and I’ve been a little involved in what he’s doing, and he promises scientifically based research-based public policy.

50:56

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, he’s starting the conversation in a very different playing field, which is really refreshing to see, that he’s kind of bringing the conversation to where the evidence takes it rather than kind of coming in with values driven approach, which is really what the vast majority of politics is about. It’s kind of like, what are your values? And kind of like if you support that, then you kind of go along with the policy. For most people that’s kind of how they operate there. So that’s, yeah, definitely political brands, think a lot of frontiers there-

51:27

Jasmine Bina:
That’s really interesting. You’re right. That is one place where I don’t know, I mean, I’d have to really think about this. I don’t know what it would take to change people’s perceptions around that.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
It’s such an entrenched bias.

51:40

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. I’m going to move this conversation forward. It relates to what we’ve been discussing here, because if you look at things like politics or the Maslow’s hierarchy that we’ve been talking about, this idea of non brands. When you want to approach these things and create new strategies that actually change perceptions and behaviors, we’ve learned over and over again it has to start with a framework. Frameworks are tools that we use to deconstruct why something works the way that it works and reconstruct something that works in a different way, the way that we want. That’s so much of brand strategy. And you actually taught me this when you started working with me at Concept Bureau, this business was very different. It was very creative. 

I’m very much a storyteller and an artist. You come from an engineering background, you studied aerospace engineering, that’s your profession. And I remember it really rubbed me the wrong way that you could take something that felt very human and organic to create a brand, to create a story, and apply these very stark principles on it. And of course I was wrong. And this is what strategy is, it’s building these frameworks. I’m going to ask you, what makes a good, reliable, effective strategic framework.

53:01

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
That’s a big question. I mean, I always try and approach these things from a very kind of first principles standpoint. My process is kind of always the same regardless of what I’m sort of working on when it comes to strategy, which is that there is a phase at the beginning where you want to explore every possibility, is kind of this vast expansion. There’s everything that can be done, there’s maybe everything that should be done that is everything that you would want to do this strategically makes sense, but you really want to start kind of factoring in everything. And so you start with expanding all the possibilities, whether you’re exploring kind of the cultural frontiers or you’re exploring the product level decisions. It’s always what is possible and then finding a mechanism to contract that down.

53:51

Jasmine Bina:
You’re saying a good framework will let you go super wide at first and then give you a device for going very narrow again. 

53:59

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, I see it as sort of an oscillation where at every stage of kind of gathering insights and making decision-making, you have to take into account sort of all the opportunities, all the possibilities, and then contract that down to what should be done. And then again, from what should be done, what is the extreme range of consequences of that? And then again, condense that down. And so it’s that-

54:21

Jasmine Bina:
Can you give an example of what that might look like.

54:23

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Okay. If we’re talking about the education space, for example, and we’re talking about the cultural frontier sort of where are we headed? There are so many different cultural narratives that we may want to play into in this space in terms of maybe we go with themes in terms of the future of work. Maybe we work against the narratives about work and talk about the individual. Maybe we talk about the actual experience of learning.

54:49

Jasmine Bina:
Maybe we talk about the materials, the coursework, the teachers, the philosophy behind teaching, the history of education. It can touch on so many different things. How we gather in spaces even, or the meaning of the classroom, or different learning styles as an example. Okay, so it can go super, super wide.

55:48

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, you need to kind of get this macro view of where is everything headed? And then within that see kind of what are the interesting points? Where is that real equity to move things forward or to be part of that forwards trajectory? Because some of these things just happen as a consequence of things changing. Some of these different changes or trends in culture are leading these changes. And so where do you want to play in? When you figure out where you want to play, then you have a subset of, okay, these are the cultural narratives. And then for example what you may do is you may look at, okay, what are all the kind of equity we have in our product and our community in terms of a brand? Where are all the points of value that we have?

You would explore all of those different things, and then you would condense that down into, okay, what are the points of equity in our brand that we have that our competitors don’t have, that kind of are a little different that are kind of like give us room to grow and evolve, that are in the trajectory of where new value is being created. And so kind of in line with inside of the cultural trajectory is kind of what is the brand equity we have in our product. And then you do the same thing looking at your audience and you would find, okay, what is there trajectory? And so all of these things you’re kind of expanding and contracting down until you get to the kind of the art of it. 

Because to some extent you can systematize a lot of these things. You can get a lot of the insight building and the criteria for a brand to be fairly scientific. But there is always a bit of a leap and maybe I haven’t come up with the right framework yet, but there is a bit of a gap between knowing what the brand needs to do and then finding the narrative to sort of artistically express that.

56:50

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah. Well, we talk about this all the time. I think that’s where the art meets the science. When you’ve done all of your strategic work, you will ideally end up with a catalog of like, this is how our brand needs to operate through this, this, this, and this, needs to work like this, this, this, and this, and needs to change this, this, this, and this. You don’t want nine answers for all the things it needs to do. You need to find that one answer, that one mechanism that answers all those nine things. That’s the artistry. It’s finding that one piece that solves so many different problems that you’ve surfaced in the strategy, research and development.

57:29

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. And just to add to that, I think once you get to that central narrative, this is the story, this is the kind of the belief and the values of the brand. That’s kind of the contraction of that entire discovery phase, kind of creating the criteria, having a very strategic belief in worldview. And then you get to the same thing again, and then you have this huge expansion of, okay, this is all the ways that we can express that, this is all the ways we can have this conversation, all the ways we can turn that into experience. And there were so many different ways. One of my favorite mechanisms for kind of discerning a good strategy from bad strategy, there was a great article in the Harvard Business Review. And it was a very, very simple anecdote that works so beautifully. It was basically that if the opposite of your strategy is not a strategy, then you don’t have a strategy. 

58:17

Jasmine Bina:
So many people hear that and just don’t get it.

58:20

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. I mean, the example I think they gave was looking at some kind of service company.

58:28

Jasmine Bina:
I remember the example. I think it was a financial services company that said we are going, our strategy is to give the most competitive products to our customers with the best service. And the opposite of that would be, we would give the least competitive products to our non-clients with the worst service, but that’s not a strategy. 

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
No one’s going to do that. 

Jasmine Bina:
So you don’t really have a strategy to begin with.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. I mean, if that’s not a strategy, then yeah, no one’s going to be moving in that direction.

58:54

Jasmine Bina:
Because a strategy is not a best practice. A strategy is how are we going to do things in a way that we can own and carve out a niche for ourselves in the market that would be hard for others to follow. 

59:07

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, for sure. And it’s always a good heuristic just to measure these things by it. You mentioned a good point about best practices and it’s definitely kind of in the latter stage of a brand strategy where best practices become really, really effective. But yeah, at a very broad level, kind of going back to the bigger question around, how do you create a framework? There is a lot of, sort of science, a lot of formula that you can provide to get all the insights and condense them down. But there’s definitely just that last sort of 5% of knowing what it needs to do and then knowing how it does that, that to some extent that’s the value of the experience, having someone who’s experienced in this and knows that best practices can guide you, but there’s always that little bit of a gap.

1:00:01

Jasmine Bina:
It’s a last mile problem. Getting to that last mile, there are systems and ways to get there super efficiently, but making that last mile happen is full of friction and it’s super hard.

1:00:13

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. And I think if we could figure out a formula for that last one, then that’d be AI coming to eat our jobs soon enough. 

1:00:22

Jasmine Bina:
To wrap this up, I think this was a great conversation. What a lot of people don’t actually know about you and me is that we’re not only partners in Concept Bureau, we’re partners in real life. You’re my husband, and we met about three and a half, four years ago. Now I had started this agency before I met you for a number of years. And then you came and completely changed everything for the better and just completely changed the way I approach things, the way I saw brand strategy and really just took this company to the next level. And that’s also when I started publishing a lot too.

And people ask us all the time, how do you do it? I could never work with my wife or husbands. And it wasn’t easy all the time, we definitely earned our strides. I’m very, very strong-willed and passionate is the word I would use. And you are also equally strong-willed and passionate about your ideas as well. I’m going to ask you not just about working couples, but to create a true partnership because so many of our clients that we’re meeting more and more of are actually founded not by an individual founder, but by co-founders. So many huge, amazing business successes of our times have co-founders behind them. And that’s a very intimate relationship to have someone because you’re literally building a life together in many ways. What is your advice to people? I don’t think I’ve ever really asked you this. What is your big takeaway from this huge experiment that you and I have undertaken? 

1:02:01

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, it’s a big question. I think what makes it especially difficult in terms of what we do is the fact that it’s creative work. If you’re two accountants working together it’d be a very different story because you could argue there’s creativity in accounting. But the point is that with creativity you’re really putting your ego on the line. You’re saying, I have this idea, what do you think about it? And they’re not always good ideas. And the process of collaboration often requires shooting people down. And if you don’t do that, then you don’t have an effective culture to work in. 

And so to some extent, I think one of the biggest challenges is ego. And it’s not easy, but learning to kind of separate your ego from a lot of these things, because the bottom line is you have a shared goal and you’re working towards that shared goal. And the thing that gets in the way is the ego. It’s not anything else usually, it’s usually somehow you’ve hurt my feelings in one way or another and we pretend like it’s creative differences, whatever. But really I think a lot of disputes come down to that. Ego I think is definitely a big part of working well together, trying to get rid of that, trying to create a culture where you’re almost encouraging that. I think the more you encourage failure, the more you kind of can throw things at the wall and see what sticks.

1:03:27

Jasmine Bina:
Yeah, that works too. I’ve never been good at failure ever. And I have always had a fixed mindset that I am only as good as I am and I constantly have to prove that to the world. Instead of a growth mindset that believes that I can get better. Accept that I’m not at the level I want to be at, but I can get better. And I’ve really had to push myself out of that mindset in the course of my career and working together was kind of a crash course in that. But creating an environment where you are constantly failing as part of the process, failing by design. I think people get that on paper when it comes to product dev or UX or things like that. But we never think about it for when it comes to interpersonal relationships or professional relationships.

1:04:12

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, definitely. I think part of that is that it’s not a true failure to some extent or not a valuable failure, unless you can pause and reflect on kind of that experience and how to move forwards from it. A lot of the time you fail and it’s frustrating and it dims your ego and it creates that little bit of tension and that just kind of continues under the radar. And I think part of it is that you have to kind of get back to that point especially if there’s some contention where you can kind of realign on values and say that, where like … Or at least when you have that success after those failures that you have that kind of alignment and that shared vision, because otherwise you’re sort of, you can be working against each other, even though you’re trying to do the same thing, so I mean, yeah.

1:05:05

Jasmine Bina:
I think also framing the failure. I know in the beginning of our working relationship I saw failure as failure, period. But now we’ve made a real habit of when we looked back at our failures, we look back at them in a grateful way, kind of fondly. We laugh about it or we tie it to like, oh, because of that failure we went to this whole new space and we had this other success. It’s how you perceive the failure that I think matters. And that’s a habit that you build with your partner. It’s not something that comes naturally. You have to constantly recontextualize what it means to not get it the first time.

1:05:44

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah. I think the soft way of addressing it is to call it iterations, and that’s really what … I mean in branding that’s what we do. And I think what we’ve found over time is that the more we do this work, the more you need to kind of get it wrong because then you’ll learn. That’s the only time you’ll find out what’s right. A lot of the time when we’re dealing with an executive team and it doesn’t quite feel right, that’s the first opportunity they have to actually articulate what it is that is right. If you don’t have that, if it’s always, yeah, this is good, yeah, this works. That’s the worst possible thing. It’s the same kind of situation.

There’s always this anecdote that I appreciated where the worst people to work with are the B players. The A-players are all-star, they’re great, they do the work and they’re fantastic at it. The C players are so bad that you get rid of them straight away. It’s the B players that aren’t quite enough to get rid of. I mean, that’s more about kind of hiring and employees, but it’s the same kind of attitude where if you think it’s not quite bad enough that it needs to be addressed, that’s probably absolutely when it needs to be addressed.

1:06:57

Jasmine Bina:
Okay. Yeah. I would also say just as a last note, for people who maybe are thinking about working with their partners, it’s very, very hard. But if you can get through the hard parts, it’s extremely rewarding and worth it. Because imagine if you could take your successes at work and have them have a halo effect over your personal life too, and that’s the benefit of this. So yeah, anyways, I think this is a good place to wrap up the interview. We explored a lot of interesting things when it comes to branding. Hopefully this has set the tone for what people can expect from the Unseen Unknown. We have a lot of really interesting people who are on the roster for interviews that are coming up. Thank you, Jean Louis, and talk to you again soon.

Jean-Louis Rawlence:
Yeah, that was fun. Thanks.

Think With Us:

Strategy In Your Inbox

Join over 20,000 strategic thinkers.